backtop


Print 58 comment(s) - last by wordsworm.. on Jun 18 at 1:55 PM

A new Samsung flagship is reportedly in the works

When the rumors about the Samsung Galaxy S5 first started raining down upon us, we were pelted with hopes of a metal body and a gorgeous QHD display. When the smartphone was officially announced, we were greeted with what was more evolution than revolution — that meant a slight bump in screen size to 5.1 inches, the same 1080p resolution, and a body that was still constructed primarily of plastic.

 
We’re now getting a few more glimpses of the next Samsung “flagship” with specs matching what people were first expecting with the Galaxy S5. The so-called Galaxy F will reportedly be announced in September according to serial leaker @evleaks.

 
Reports suggest that the Galaxy F will come equipped with a QHD (2560x1440) display like the LG G3, and will actually sport a full metal back (unlike the faux-metallic G3). There are also reports that a Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 processor will be onboard to provide not only faster processing speeds to fuel the QHD display, but also a fast onboard modem courtesy of the 225Mbps LTE-A Qualcomm MDM9635.

Source: Evleaks



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: So it has come to this now?
By quiksilvr on 6/16/2014 3:50:59 PM , Rating: 2
My concern is for the people locked into a two year contract that can only upgrade annually (or pay even more fees for faster upgrades) and are given no indication that the "flagship" they settled with is going to be outclassed in such a short time frame. Sure annually is fine, but LESS than six months and people finally get a metal Galaxy phone with an actual upgrade to the processor...and weren't told that such a device even existed?

I get that we have this notice NOW. It just begs the question why wasn't this flagship announced for the significant market of people that wanted these features but had to settle due to the limitations of their contract? Being aware of the choice and options would have sufficed.

I am not arguing that you should simply get what works for you and that you shouldn't be worried about the latest and greatest. And I am also aware of no-contract plans that make upgrading super easy (just sell the phone). Hell, I'm no contract and I had my Galaxy Nexus for two years without issue. But if you're tied to a contract and you're only window of opportunity is once every 1-2 years, you want to be sure you aren't simply "settling" for the year only to see that the phone is upgraded within months. It's a low blow against loyal users and bad business, just like with the DROID and DROID MAXX.


RE: So it has come to this now?
By Reclaimer77 on 6/16/2014 4:23:04 PM , Rating: 2
Sooo Samsung or whoever should formally announce they are working on a newer phone model?

Can we say "duh"? That's a given!!

Some of you here are just ridiculous, sorry. I can't even believe what I'm reading.


RE: So it has come to this now?
By Spuke on 6/16/2014 5:04:47 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Some of you here are just ridiculous, sorry. I can't even believe what I'm reading.
Like I said before, some people here are just weird.


RE: So it has come to this now?
By retrospooty on 6/16/2014 4:26:44 PM , Rating: 2
OK, I get your point, but then where do you draw the line?

The Galaxy S5 was announced a few months back... What if they announced it earlier? What if they announced this new metal one earlier? Then people that bought a few months before that would be in the same boat. There are always better phones and always will be. It's a given and like I said, if you or anyone else is concerned with it, they should pony up the extra $10 a month to get on their carriers jump/next whatever plan so they can upgrade more often.


RE: So it has come to this now?
By quiksilvr on 6/16/2014 7:02:32 PM , Rating: 2
I guess in 2015 this is a non-issue once we know the summer season is when the "pro" version of their spring flagship phone is released.

I was just hoping for a more clear cut schedule on this beforehand so consumers wouldn't get screwed this year.


By Monkey's Uncle on 6/17/2014 10:06:48 AM , Rating: 2
The galaxy F is a hardware update from the S5. The S5 would have had to come first to set the baseline.

But I wonder if you guys realize the aluminum part is nothing more than a flimsy little battery cover? Aluminum battery covers have been around on ebay for a while now for the S4 for about $5 each.

All it would really take is to buy an aluminum battery cover and *presto changeo* instant Samsung Galaxy F look-alike.


"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki