backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Jun 17 at 6:08 PM

Samsung's latest Android tablets manage to beat Apple's iPads on weight, and thinness

Samsung is bolstering its efforts in the tablet market with two new offerings which JK Shin, CEO of Samsung Electronics’ Mobile Division, says are “setting the industry bar higher for the entire mobile industry.”
 
Like the iPad Air and iPad mini with Retina Display, the 8.4” and 10.5” Galaxy Tab S tablets share the same display resolution and processor/GPU, which means they mainly differ in screen and battery size. That means that both comes equipped with a Exynos 5 Octa processor (1.9 GHz quad-core + 1.3 GHz quad-core) for Wi-Fi models, Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor (2.3GHz quad-core) for LTE models, 3GB RAM, 2560x1600 resolution Super AMOLED displays, 16GB or 32GB of internal storage, microSD expansion, 8MP rear camera, 2.1MP front camera, and optional LTE connectivity. Both tablets of course run Android 4.4 KitKat.

 
Besides the differences in screen size, the 8.4” model comes with a 4,900 mAh battery while the 12.5” model has a larger 7,900 mAh battery.
 
Both models are also thinner and lighter than their respectively iPad counterparts. The 10.5” Galaxy Tab S weighs 465g and is 6.6mm thick compared to 469g and 7.5mm for the iPad Air. Likewise, the 8.4” Galaxy Tab S weighs 294g and is 6.6mm thick compared to 331g and 7.5mm for the iPad mini with Retina Display.

 
The 8.4” and 10.5” Galaxy Tab S will be available next month starting at $399 and $499 respectively. Both will be available in Titanium Bronze or Dazzling White.

 

Source: Samsung



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By retrospooty on 6/13/2014 7:58:38 PM , Rating: 2
Do you have anything other than apps? You bring it in to every conversation. We are talking about memory and if 16gb is enough, and you come out of left field with a rediculous comment about apps. It just looks trollish. Surely you can admit that right?


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By KoolAidMan1 on 6/15/2014 3:48:29 AM , Rating: 2
Stability, security, support, performance, those are all things too. You really want to get into another discussion about where else Android is lagging?

And obviously apps matter in a discussion about memory. 16GB is obviously not enough for any device. It should be 32GB minimum internal storage by now, but if you don't really use apps, and most Android users don't, then it doesn't really matter. Expansion doesn't solve this since it's only good for media and Google is depreciating support as we speak.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By retrospooty on 6/15/2014 8:38:17 AM , Rating: 2
"16GB is obviously not enough for any device. It should be 32GB minimum internal storage by now"

That is exactly what I was saying this whole time, and that is what this thread was about. You just came out of left field with "Android apps suck" which is A) off topic and B) Your personal (and incorrect) soapbox rant.


"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki