backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Jun 17 at 6:08 PM

Samsung's latest Android tablets manage to beat Apple's iPads on weight, and thinness

Samsung is bolstering its efforts in the tablet market with two new offerings which JK Shin, CEO of Samsung Electronics’ Mobile Division, says are “setting the industry bar higher for the entire mobile industry.”
 
Like the iPad Air and iPad mini with Retina Display, the 8.4” and 10.5” Galaxy Tab S tablets share the same display resolution and processor/GPU, which means they mainly differ in screen and battery size. That means that both comes equipped with a Exynos 5 Octa processor (1.9 GHz quad-core + 1.3 GHz quad-core) for Wi-Fi models, Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor (2.3GHz quad-core) for LTE models, 3GB RAM, 2560x1600 resolution Super AMOLED displays, 16GB or 32GB of internal storage, microSD expansion, 8MP rear camera, 2.1MP front camera, and optional LTE connectivity. Both tablets of course run Android 4.4 KitKat.

 
Besides the differences in screen size, the 8.4” model comes with a 4,900 mAh battery while the 12.5” model has a larger 7,900 mAh battery.
 
Both models are also thinner and lighter than their respectively iPad counterparts. The 10.5” Galaxy Tab S weighs 465g and is 6.6mm thick compared to 469g and 7.5mm for the iPad Air. Likewise, the 8.4” Galaxy Tab S weighs 294g and is 6.6mm thick compared to 331g and 7.5mm for the iPad mini with Retina Display.

 
The 8.4” and 10.5” Galaxy Tab S will be available next month starting at $399 and $499 respectively. Both will be available in Titanium Bronze or Dazzling White.

 

Source: Samsung



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By Reclaimer77 on 6/13/2014 4:22:36 PM , Rating: 2
Anandtech scientifically tests everything in a controlled environment using EXACTING standards to ensure a fair and impartial result.

But yeah, you found a video posted by some random person with no mention of specifics or methodology. That's totally more reliable.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By retrospooty on 6/13/2014 4:28:45 PM , Rating: 2
"Anandtech scientifically tests everything in a controlled environment using EXACTING standards to ensure a fair and impartial result"

Dood, Anandtech has been my home page for literally 16 years now. I seee it I use it I enjoy it, but they are not infallible. The lag exists, i KNOW it exists I have seen it myself on many devices as has everyone else who has done testing on Samsung units . Do you think I made up the term "Sambloat"? FFS, I dont need to prove it to you, everyone already knows it.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By Reclaimer77 on 6/13/2014 4:29:26 PM , Rating: 2
Actually I think I see the problem here:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7903/samsung-galaxy-...

Go to NAND performance. The S5 is lagging behind big time on random read and writes. Which we all know from SSD's, impact visible performance far more than sequential. No question, that needs to be fixed.

So we're not seeing "Sambloat", we're see poor I/O causing the UI to appear laggy and stuttery in some use-cases.

So I dunno, sorry that a few minutes of research invalidates your entire theory.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By Reclaimer77 on 6/13/2014 4:38:46 PM , Rating: 2
Argh of course, I just remembered that Motorola uses that Flash Friendly File System.

Yeah sorry, "Sambloat" nothing. This is strictly an I/O issue.

Which is ironic because Samsung created it but doesn't use it in their own phones lol.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By retrospooty on 6/13/2014 6:09:03 PM , Rating: 2
"So we're not seeing "Sambloat", we're see poor I/O causing the UI to appear laggy and stuttery in some use-cases."

Now that I think about it this does make sense... It goes away when you remove the bloat, but flash's issue on the old file system especially is always random read/write i/o. That would make sense why it is slow and why it goes away when you remove the bloat... It also explains why its not always bad, but often...

Still, no matter how you look at that it's a piss poor design and leads to a laggy product. There is no way to say it other than poor choices made by Samsungs s/w teams either way.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By Reclaimer77 on 6/13/2014 7:48:53 PM , Rating: 2
I agree. I don't understand why Samsung went with sequential > random this time. Especially how their previous models have always ranked near the top in I/O.

UNLESS the phone is not working as intended, in that case we'll just see if they are going to fix this later.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By retrospooty on 6/13/2014 5:02:46 PM , Rating: 2
No, it doesnt... It's not a benchmark issue, it needs a more tactile test. This is how to test.

1. Get a Samsung phone and a few others, like a Moto E, X, or an LG G2, One M8, anything non-Samsung.

2. Launch app - chrome is a good one - launches faster on all non-Samsung phones.
3. Load a web page and scroll up and down. Note the chop.
4. Transitions, just going from homepage to homepage can chop out on a Samsung phone.
5. Now root your Samsung phone, and disable the Samsung bloat. BOOM, fast as hell now.

I have done this myself on many friends and family phones. I kid you not. Whatever the issue is, it goes away when you disable the Samsung and carrier apps, and then your Samsung phone shines. The point is you shouldnt have to root it to get it operating at a a normal speed.

Look, the S5 is better than previous (the S4 and Note 3 were the "bloatpeak", but its still there to a lesser extent. There is nothing you can say or link that changes that.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By ritualm on 6/14/2014 8:57:23 PM , Rating: 2
I am amazed at Reclaimer77's insistence that Sambloat is a godsend to Android. I've seen Sambloat in action, and using it is like playing multiplayer FPS with a satellite internet connection - it's doable, but it's not enjoyable, because the lag really sucks.

My S4 must be rooted on Day 1 just so I can get rid of Sambloat and its world-famous lag issues. I shouldn't have to do that to get a good user experience out of my phone, for crying out loud. If I'm less technically inclined, I'd think all Samsung Android-powered devices are horrible because of Sambloat, and seek other alternatives.

It's really that bad.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By retrospooty on 6/15/2014 8:44:44 AM , Rating: 2
"I am amazed at Reclaimer77's insistence that Sambloat is a godsend to Android."

I don't think he was saying that it was a godsend, he seems to think it isn't that much of an issue - Which I wholly disagree. It is. It is bad and it gives the whole Android platform a bad impression. I havent sen an S5 in person other than thse videos where a lowly Moto E outpaces it in the UI and scrolling, but I have seen several Note 3's one of which I used extensively, and even it lags like crazy -much worse than the S5 in the videos. Even just launching a single app like chrome there is an extremely noticeable delay.


RE: Happy with my Samsung...
By Reclaimer77 on 6/17/2014 6:08:18 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I am amazed at Reclaimer77's insistence that Sambloat is a godsend to Android.


Yeah that's totally what I'm saying...

Meh I'm not even playing this game with you. Illiteracy is so sad to see.


"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki