backtop


Print 43 comment(s) - last by tygrus.. on Jul 28 at 10:12 AM

Samsung solid-state NAND hard drives will be cheaper than reported, more versatile

Earlier today Samsung announced its 4GB solid-state NAND hard drives. The 1.8" and 2.5" devices will primarily be marketed for enthusiast and high-end desktops supporting Microsoft Windows Vista's ReadyBoost feature.

A DailyTech competitor claims "Samsung confirmed to TG Daily that the SSD is likely to be priced below $200," implying the price of the drive would be just under $200.  In fact, when DailyTech talked to Samsung the company confirmed that the device will cost significantly less than that, perhaps as much as $100 less. The company has not released pricing on the drive yet, but current prices on the NAND spot market quote 4GB of flash memory between $62 and $70.  Samsung Semiconductor's Director of Flash Marketing, Don Barnetson, was able to confirm that a slight premium on these prices was more in line with real pricing of the drives.

Samsung clarified during our conversation that the initial versions of the SSD will feature a Parallel ATA interface as opposed to the newer Serial ATA interface use in notebooks and PCs. Additionally, many of the chipsets Intel is releasing do not support the PATA interface so Samsung will definitely need to think about switching to SATA sooner than later. The SSD drives can be mounted in a PC using mechanical mounts or a 2.5-inch slot.

According to Samsung, the 4GB SSD should be ready to ship in time for the Vista launch, and features 57MBps read speeds and 31MBps write speeds and up to 5,000 operations per second.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: ...
By shabby on 7/26/2006 7:17:25 PM , Rating: 2
57mbps / 8 = 7.125 megs/second.


RE: ...
By NainoKami on 7/26/2006 7:34:51 PM , Rating: 4
Learn the topygraphy.

57 MBps = 57 MB/s
57 Mbps = 7.125 MB/s

B = byte
b = bit


Stop whining....


RE: ...
By eomhS on 7/26/2006 7:35:14 PM , Rating: 2
it says 57MBps x 8= 456Mbps!


RE: ...
By Samus on 7/27/2006 1:45:07 AM , Rating: 2
you don't have to worry about arial efficiency, either. most drives slow down when they're more than half full, however, solid state has the same access time and throughput for every block of memory.

you will still have to defragment it though.


RE: ...
By surt on 7/27/2006 10:49:55 AM , Rating: 2
You wouldn't need to worry about defragging as much, really, because fragmented files just require extra seeks, and seeks are much faster on flash drives.


RE: ...
By TomZ on 7/27/2006 10:51:31 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
you will still have to defragment it though.

Why? If there is nearly zero latency, then how much of an effect would fragmentation have?


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki