Print 21 comment(s) - last by epobirs.. on Jun 13 at 5:35 PM

Nokia lineup will see some changes, but some things will hold steady for now

Out with the old, in with the new -- sort of.  That's the message of a leaked roadmap of Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) plans when it comes to the crucial branding and integration of its newly acquired devices unit, which it purchased from Finland's Nokia Oyj. (HEX:NOK1V).

The Microsoft-Nokia tieup took a new turn last September when Microsoft announced that it was acquiring Nokia Devices for €3.79B ($5.24B USD) and licensing Nokia's patents and software services (e.g. HERE maps) for €1.65B ($2.28B USD), in a deal initially worth $7.2B USD.  Adjusting for current exchange rates, the deal at its close was worth just slightly more -- around $7.5B USD.  The purchase wrapped up in April, after receiving regulatory approvals.

It was well known that as part of its purchase Microsoft received the right to use the "Nokia" brand on new and existing devices until 2016.  The leaked documents adds a bit more detail to that timeline:
  • New Lumia devices can use the "Nokia" name until November 25, 2015 (18 months)

    Nokia Lumia 930
  • New Nokia X devices (which use a branch of Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Android OS) can use the "Nokia" name until December 31, 2015 (19 months)
    Nokia X screens
  • "Other" new phones (Asha/feature phone brands) can use the "Nokia" name until April 25, 2024

    Nokia Asha
  • Strategy & Planning:
    "Microsoft brand will only replace the Nokia brand in product, applications and experiences when Microsoft has launched a new product into the market."
The latter point is particularly interesting and relatively new news -- that Microsoft will be able to continue to use the Nokia name on basic (Symbian) handsets for developing nations for nearly a decade.  Further, according to Neowin's interpretation of the text about branding replacement,  the branding switch may occur well before the deadline to give Microsoft room to switch its marketing efforts.  It's possible we could see the switch in branding as early as the 2015 Mobile World Congress at the end of Feb. 2015 or at Microsoft's own 2015 BUILD conference, in April 2015.

The document is dated from Jan. 2014, so while much of the details are new and intriguing, it may be a bit dated.  It refers to "Day One", which actually was April 25, 2014, the day the Nokia Devices acquisition wrapped up.

Nokia Microsoft branding
[Image Source: Microsoft via]

Other highlights from the document include:
  • Strategy & Planning
    • From "Day One", current handset families -- "Nokia Lumia, Nokia Asha, Nokia X" -- should continue to use the "Nokia".
    • Future devices will likely be dubbed the "Microsoft Lumia, Microsoft X, etc."
    • Store rebranding will be slow:
      "[Microsoft is] carefully planning how, when and where to introduce the Microsoft brand [to Nokia retail stores] over a significant period of time."
    • No clear plan is in place (as of Jan. 2014) as to how to rebrand the Nokia Care Centers
  • Marketing
    • The Nokia "Pure" font family will immediately be dropped for store and marketing efforts and replaced with Microsoft's official Segoe font family.

      Nokia Pure vs. Segoe
      Nokia's "Pure" font vs. Microsoft's "Segoe" [Image Source: Neowin]

    • Microsoft has not acquired:
      • The iconic "Nokia ringtone"
      • Nokia's trademarked slogan "Connecting People"
      • Nokia's hands logo

        Nokia hands logo
    • However... "All Nokia branded products must carry the Nokia tune as default, and logo as it does today. We are evaluating the impact of this decision on future product releases."
    • So Nokia owns the rights to these items, but Microsoft gets a very limited license to them.
    • The slogan will eventually be swapped for a Microsoft alternative:
      "tools for unleashing innovation in everyone on the planet"

As we've discussed, there's a fair likelihood that Nokia is planning a return to the market a few years down the road with either Windows Phone or Android handsets of its own, given the legal language in the sales document.  However, the longer license for Nokia Asha and feature phone branding suggests that if Nokia does make a return, its efforts will be confined to the smartphone space.

Sources: EVLeaks, via Neowin

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By name99 on 6/12/2014 12:56:44 PM , Rating: 5
The slogan will eventually be swapped for a Microsoft alternative:
"tools for unleashing innovation in everyone on the planet"

Why can Microsoft not learn that less is more --- when it comes to APIs, to product names, even to slogans?
There's a kernel of a good slogan in that mess above --- but the kernel is drowned by adding to many unnecessary words.

The slogan SHOULD be:
"Mcrosoft: unleashing innovation in everyone".
Half as long --- hundreds of times as snappy.

By datdamonfoo on 6/12/2014 1:51:09 PM , Rating: 4
Vista ran well on current hardware. The issues were that manufacturers would stick "Vista Ready" stickers on their lower tier products, but failed to mention that they were actually "Vista without enhancements Ready". This is why Microsoft placed strict limits on what could be considered ready when they released Windows 7.

By Solandri on 6/12/2014 2:43:04 PM , Rating: 2
Isn't that Microsoft Marketing's fault though? Instead of honestly saying Vista's minimum requirement was 1 GB of RAM, they didn't want to "discourage" users of older hardware from upgrading (i.e. paying Microsoft money). So they added something in there about "Vista without enhancements" needing only 512 MB of RAM to run.

If your marketing plays fast and loose with the facts, it's disingenuous to blame your resellers for following in your footsteps and doing the exact same thing.

By epobirs on 6/13/2014 5:35:33 PM , Rating: 3
Intel deserves a lot of the blame as well. They insisted that Microsoft allow Aero to run on the then shipping Intel integrated GPUs that fell well short of Aero's hardware requirements. This meant that Vista systems shipped with just Intel IGA for video were doing a lot of their operations in software that were intended to be hardware functions. This made for horrible performance and a lot of added CPU overhead. A lot of Vista boxes could be remarkably improved by installing a sub-$50 video card.

If Intel had sooner gotten on the ball about having decent IGA relative to the era or if Microsoft had been more assertive, the market could have been spared a lot of misery.

By bug77 on 6/13/2014 3:57:15 AM , Rating: 1
Do you know of any OS launch that targeted mid to high-end systems only? Windows 7 had virtually the same requirements as Vista, but was released two years later. Of course by that time it would run with no issues on any system.
Anyway, no one stuck any "Vista ready" system on their PCs without Microsoft's blessing.

By Gunbuster on 6/12/2014 2:01:18 PM , Rating: 1
Oh yes, because the logical leap is that the same people who develop the OS also write the marketing material. ?_?

By SteelRing on 6/12/2014 1:50:48 PM , Rating: 1
it's probably they employ some overjealous spelling bee winners as their slogan maker. yes, you know what i mean.

By SteelRing on 6/12/2014 1:53:55 PM , Rating: 1
and I can't spell "overzealous" obviously

By arazok on 6/12/2014 2:16:54 PM , Rating: 4
It only seems bad if you don’t realize the original slogan was “Hardware and software tools for unleashing innovation and customer delight in everyone on the planet through feature aggregation and interface unity.”

By Reclaimer77 on 6/12/2014 3:02:13 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know about all that, but I do feel this is another blow to the brand image of Microsoft's mobile efforts.

First it was WinMobile, then Windows Phone 7, then 7.5, then 8, now 8.1 etc etc.

On the hardware side, there's seemingly a sea of code-numbered "Lumia" devices that don't mean anything to the average consumer.

And now this? I just feel this is really going to cost them even more brand image recognition with the average (uninformed) consumer. Too many changes, too fast, to an already ambiguous product.

Just...sigh! At this rate Google and Microsoft will never crowd out, and eventually destroy, Apple :(

By YearOfTheDingo on 6/12/2014 4:14:02 PM , Rating: 3
Marketing folks at Apple would probably go with "Minds unleashed."

Microsoft / Nokia Mobile.
By HardwareDufus on 6/12/2014 4:21:22 PM , Rating: 2
Disclaimer: I have 4 Lumia devices in my household (2 * 920, 1 * 520, 1 * 2520). Ok got that out of the way.

Love the devices. Really feel like with Nokia Firmware, Microsoft OS and Vendor Application updates that the entire Windows/Nokia Lumia Mobile platform is coming together nicely.

That said... Really feels like Steve Ballmer bought a lot of NOTHING for $7.2 Billion. Nokia is free to basically take it all back 18 months from now... every bit of it (except the lowend stuff). I guess Microsoft does get to keep the Lumia Brand name which accounts for about 1% of the mobile space...

But then I started to consider things like Market Capitalization of Microsoft... and I looked at when the Microsoft/Nokia Deal was announced in Sept 2013... Microsoft's capitalization after that was around $272 Billion. April 2014 it was worth around $335 Billion. Even now, in June, it's still at $335 Billion. Obviously other things are at play, but one this sure... Once Microsoft/Nokia announced the deallll and then it became effective.... Folks valued the company at $63 Billion dollars more... Only major change... Nokia acquisition. I makes the $7.2 Billion money well spent. Now what will be interesting is to look again at Microsoft's Market Capitalization at the end of Dec 2015 when it hands so much back to Nokia...

Interesting... Let's see what Microsoft does with this nice entry level position it's bought for itself....

RE: Microsoft / Nokia Mobile.
By Krinosy on 6/12/2014 8:53:44 PM , Rating: 2
Microsoft purchased the actual entire devices & services division, including the manufacturing facilities, distribution networks, carrier agreements, staff, the actual Lumia and Asha brands - the whole kit and caboodle. What they didn't buy were the actual Nokia brand and its associated bits (e.g. slogan, handshake animation, ringtone).

So what exactly is Nokia going to take back in 18 months? They will have had control of their own brand the entire time (because MS didn't buy that), but without their actual D&S unit (i.e. no device R&D, manufacturing, distribution, marketing or sales) I suppose they could blow a lot of money to start from scratch?

Apple biters
By CalaverasGrande on 6/12/14, Rating: -1
RE: Apple biters
By Reclaimer77 on 6/12/2014 1:42:59 PM , Rating: 3
Oh piss off!!!!!

RE: Apple biters
By datdamonfoo on 6/12/2014 1:52:25 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not sure if you're serious. Please look up the Nokia Lumia line, which predates Apple's (ugly) Iphone 5C, and look at the colors they had available for their phones.

RE: Apple biters
By siberus on 6/12/2014 1:57:50 PM , Rating: 2
Thx a lot!! My sarcasm meter is broken now. Can't tell if your being serious or not.

RE: Apple biters
By Farfignewton on 6/12/2014 3:19:18 PM , Rating: 3
Seems totally serious. No doubt MS created a time machine so they could "rip-off" Apple's future "innovations".

RE: Apple biters
By Camikazi on 6/12/2014 5:34:55 PM , Rating: 3
Not necessary, everyone steals from Apple regardless of time the other company already had the feature out, once Apple releases it they made it first and the other company is copying.

RE: Apple biters
By Belegost on 6/12/2014 11:02:49 PM , Rating: 2
Yea, you know seeing as the 5C is raking it in with amazingly mediocre sales figures!

I'm glad MS used their time machine for that, because I really like my cyan Lumia 920 which was released only a year before the 5C.

"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki