U.S. Lawmakers Eye EV Taxes, Fees as Gas Tax Revenue Drops on Fuel Efficiency Gains
June 2, 2014 5:32 PM
comment(s) - last by
American lawmakers can't make up their mind about how best to meddle in the market
have long been a stable source of revenue for states. In Feb. 1919 Oregon introduced
the first gas tax
-- $0.039 USD/gallon ($0.53 USD/gallon in 2014 dollars). Since then, every other state has jumped onboard. Average rates have remained relatively unchanged, at around $0.315 USD/gallon, on average (state only). At the federal level a smaller gas tax accounts for $25B USD in revenue -- 60 percent of which goes to federal highways, and 40 percent of which goes to federal budget earmarks (a notorious source of corruption). The federal government in 1993 raised this tax to $0.184 USD/gallon in an effort to balance the budget and
boost fuel efficiency
Today you wind up paying, on average, roughly half a dollar in taxes to your state and federal government per gallon of fuel you buy.
But the federal government is worried. After
pushing so hard with ambitious Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standard
, the government is now wondering if it went to far, as
soaring fuel economy
sinks state tax revenues.
Vehicles like the Ford Fiesta can average 45 mpg on the highway even without hybrid tech
Kristina Egan, the director of
Transportation for Massachusetts
, is among those concerned. Her group promotes
large public transit projects
, which are highly dependent on state and federal dollars. She comments:
We are going to continue to rely on the gas tax for quite a while to maintain the safety of our roads and bridges. But it is really important for us to start exploring sources to supplement the gas tax as cars become more fuel-efficient.
Between this year and 2040, annual sales of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV), and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are expected to double in the New England area, according to projections by the
U.S. Energy Information Administration
The effects of that increase have already been felt. A Dec. 2013 report by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) brought bittersweet news. Between 2004 and 2012, high oil prices and federal regulation helped to increase the average fuel economy of American vehicles by
. The downside, of course, is that effectively amounts to a 22 percent decline in tax revenue.
President Obama's "test drive" of a Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid back in 2010. [Image Source: AP]
Jeffrey Mullan, a former Obama administration Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT) between 2009 and 2012, says that states are eyeing tolls to restore revenues. He comments:
We need to develop a new proxy, and for me, the easiest and most useful option — and the one users are more familiar with — is tolling. I predict we will see more tolling as a solution — partly because people are familiar with it, but also because states are beginning to take matters into their own hands. They’re relying less on federal resources to finance their own programs.
The Massachusetts and Chicago turnpikes are among the most highly trafficked highways to feature high tolls. While critics fear that increasing tolls and rolling back restrictions on interstate tolling could raise the cost of products -- due to higher truck delivery costs -- the movement has some high-profile backers. Last month, President Barack Obama
joined the list of supporters
for rolling back federal restrictions on interstate tolling.
If tolling is the Democratic National Party's answer to falling gas tax revenues, fees on EVs and hybrids is another prospect being explored by the Republican National Party. Massachusetts
State Rep. Bradley H. Jones, Jr.
(R), introduced an amendment to a bill which would have
charged an additional $100 USD registration fee
[PDF] on electric vehicles. The amendment was struck down, as even Rep. Jones' party colleagues were skittish about appearing to punitive towards "green" vehicles in an election year.
Some have called for taking on extra fees for electric vehicles like the Tesla Model S
Rep. Jones defends the plan, though, calling it a natural development, explaining:
That person who switches to an all-electronic vehicle, they’re paying nothing for the benefit of the upkeep, maintenance, and filling of potholes on the roads. The issue is really one of equity. Eventually, you’ve got to have that discussion. If everybody ultimately switches over to electric cars, what would you do?
Barbara Anderson, the executive director of Marblehead, Mass. advocacy
Citizens for Limited Taxation
, was moderately supportive of the idea despite the fact that it represented more regulation and fees -- something her group typically opposes. She states:
I think there’s a balance you have to strike. We want to have an incentive for people to buy cleaner cars. But we don’t want that incentive to be so much that only people who are using gas are paying for roads and bridges.
Some states are going for a more overt option --
simply increasing gas taxes
. But that raises the risk of a backlash. In Massachusetts, the gas tax was raised for the first time in two decades from $0.21 USD/gallon to $0.24 USD/gallon. The hike led to much public outcry. Some have advocated scrapping the gas tax entirely. A local petition gathered 100,000 signatures -- enough to put the question on the ballot for Massachusetts’ voters this fall. Now Massachusetts state officials have to deal with the possibility that they could soon have no gas taxes, losing what was before the increase a $677M USD revenue source.
[Image Source: Ocala Post]
A final solution that some Republicans and Democrats are considering as a way to "Trojan horse" EV taxes into the system is to
offer mileage taxes
. Such taxes could still target vehicles like hybrids, and could also charge gas vehicles at a high rate, when all the numbers are crunched.
Oregon is on the eve of a trial program
with 5,000 volunteers whose cars will be
GPS-tracked in order to calculate an annual tax bill
. The volunteer test kicks off next year.
Mr. Mullan isn't so sure that idea would work, though. He warns:
The reaction is often, 'Why do I have to pay more? Don’t punish me.' New things are difficult to implement, especially when people are just not 100 percent certain of it.
By the sound of it no one can quite agree on how to handle the revenue crisis created by rising fuel economy. Or in other words, this has been another federal edition of "be careful what you wish for."
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Fuel Economy?
6/2/2014 8:27:21 PM
Well speaking truthfully, there isn't any reason that electrics shouldn't pay some tax since they're not buying gas. Those taxes exist to pay for roads. Either get rid of the taxes and make it up in other ways (sales tax) that effects everyone equally, or electric vehicle drivers should have to pay in some way for the road wear they cause. Not get to drive on them for free at the cost of everyone else.
At the state level there is nothing wrong with this. The federal government should get out of all road projects though other than the interstates at most. But honestly I'd be for them getting out of that as well. As I've said before, the interstates serve a military purpose so I'm not against the federal government being involved with them. But that's where their influence should be strictly limited. No more federally subsidized state transportation projects that only benefit commuters of a state.
RE: Fuel Economy?
6/2/2014 8:29:42 PM
And let me say that I'm most for getting rid of gas taxes and making it up through sales taxes. It's the only fair way to tax everyone. Otherwise you have to employ a complicated system where gas vehicles just pay the gas tax, hybrids pay the gas tax plus a small fee, plugins pay gas tax plus a slightly higher fee, and electrics pay the highest fee since they use no gas.
“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads
GM to Use Aluminum Bodies on Next Gen Trucks to Reduce Weight, Boost Fuel Economy
February 19, 2014, 12:45 PM
House Proposes 15 Cent Federal Gas Tax Increase
December 9, 2013, 10:00 AM
Bob Lutz Says Ditch CAFE, Raise Gas Taxes $0.25 USD Per Year
April 19, 2013, 10:58 AM
National Academy of Sciences to Obama: Push Gas Taxes, 100 MPG Cars by 2050
March 19, 2013, 4:36 PM
White House Finalizes 54.5 MPG CAFE Standards for 2017-2025 Model Years
August 28, 2012, 2:52 PM
AT&T Will Also Receive the HTC One (M8) for Windows
August 19, 2014, 9:27 PM
Sharp's "Edge-to-Edge" AQUOS Crystal Smartphone Coming to Sprint for $239 Off-Contract
August 19, 2014, 7:31 PM
After 34 Years With Microsoft, Steve Ballmer Parts Way to Focus on LA Clippers
August 19, 2014, 4:17 PM
HTC One (M8) for Windows Officially Announced for Verizon Wireless
August 19, 2014, 12:15 PM
Quick Note: ASUS Readies Smartwatch for IFA 2014, Shows Teaser Image
August 19, 2014, 9:30 AM
LG Already Gearing Up for G Watch Sequel Next Month
August 19, 2014, 7:54 AM
Most Popular Articles
Lumia 830 Gets Major Upgrades Including New 20.1 Megapixel Toshiba Sensor
August 15, 2014, 6:00 PM
With USB Type-C Spec Finalized, Reversible Cables Will Soon Be Upon Us
August 13, 2014, 8:46 AM
Windows Phone, BlackBerry Smartphone Market Share Falls to 2.5%, 0.5% Respectively
August 15, 2014, 9:44 AM
Update: Samsung Gets Official With 4.7”, Aluminum-frame Galaxy Alpha Smartphone
August 14, 2014, 8:56 AM
GM Concedes That the Cadillac ELR Doesn’t Really Compete with the Tesla Model S
August 15, 2014, 5:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information