backtop


Print 37 comment(s) - last by elleehswon.. on May 15 at 11:07 PM

Not long after LG posts an official teaser for its upcoming QHD G3 smartphone, leaked press renders hit the web

Late yesterday, LG posted a teaser video of its upcoming G3 smartphone which gave some fleeting glances at the phone including close-ups of its image stabilized rear camera. You can see the video here:
 

Not long after, however, Phone Arena gave us the full goods by posting leaked renders of the actual device. The G3 will be available in three colors: Gold, Titan Grey, and Silver. The close-up shots also show what appears to be a brushed metal backplate, but Phone Arena states that this could very well be a traditional polycarbonate shell textured to look like brushed metal.

 
The phone’s most talked about feature, however, is its 5.5”, 2560x1440 (QHD) display with 538 pixels per inch (PPI). We’ve already heard from Huawei Consumer Business Group CEO Richard Yu that QHD screens are “nonsense” and “a stupid thing,” but Toshiba obviously sees some benefit in this display "arms race."
 
Other reported features included a Snapdragon 801 processor, 3GB of RAM, a 13MP rear camera, and of course the latest version of Android 4.4.x KitKat.

 
To get complete details on the LG G3, we’ll have to wait for its May 27 official reveal.

Sources: LG Electronics [YouTube], Phone Arena



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By Reclaimer77 on 5/15/2014 12:14:43 PM , Rating: -1
quote:
Firstly, it's not ignoring if you didn't know about the tech (sorry if I don't spend my time knowing every feature in every phone model).


Oh that's fine, but it's okay to browbeat me and claim I'm ignorant and that I know "nothing".

Cool, just making sure we're on a level playing field here.

quote:
No, I'm mostly interested in pointing out that you have no clue what you're talking about.


Go fuck yourself.


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By inighthawki on 5/15/2014 12:20:57 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Oh that's fine, but it's okay to browbeat me and claim I'm ignorant and that I know "nothing".

No, the difference is that it's unrelated and orthogonal concept. It's like claiming they implemented a new antennae that reduces power consumption from 4G use. That's great, but not knowing about it doesn't change the facts I told you about relating to resolution and GPU utilization. You on the other hand are going around claiming with certain knowledge that X and Y are true, but they're really not. If you don't see the difference then I can't help you.

quote:
Go f*ck yourself.

Sure, but it's entirely fair for me to point that out. You think you're going around "educating people" but you're not. You're just making claims that you thought were true, but in reality isn't how stuff works.


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By Reclaimer77 on 5/15/2014 12:30:57 PM , Rating: 1
I said "pushing a few extra pixels around has no practical impact on battery life".

Key word: practical.

Also unlike you, I'm using layman's terms for the benefit of the reader. Throwing around technojargon on a forum may make you feel superior, but it doesn't mean you're right.

However despite all this, you've been unable to refute my claim because it's based on fact. There will be no PRACTICAL penalty in battery life on the G3 by going with a QHD screen.

I'm arguing practical, and you're pulling out the spec's sheet. See what I'm saying?


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By inighthawki on 5/15/2014 12:54:41 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I said "pushing a few extra pixels around has no practical impact on battery life".

Key word: practical.

So what are you looking for as a counter example? Raw numbers? Number of minutes and seconds shave doff from using a higher res display? Unfortunately I don't work at Samsung, or LG, or anyone who makes phones so I can't just go take a reference model design and plug in a new display and measure the difference. The best I can do is provide real world technical facts about how a higher resolution has an impact on things. I don't have numbers in a spreadsheet anywhere, but I can tell you from personal experience that these things do matter. Raising the PState on a GPU can easily shave an hour off battery life alone.

quote:
Also unlike you, I'm using layman's terms for the benefit of the reader. Throwing around technojargon on a forum may make you feel superior, but it doesn't mean you're right.

Wow. That is low. So basically, you don't actually provide any facts yourself, just "trust me, there's no 'practical' difference." You're then presented with a number of factual statements about how higher resolution displays can impact battery life, and then you spin things on me and make ME the bad guy because I'm trying to "act superior" and make you feel bad or something?

quote:
However despite all this, you've been unable to refute my claim because it's based on fact. There will be no PRACTICAL penalty in battery life on the G3 by going with a QHD screen.

NO. You haven't provided ANY facts. Your statements are literally the opposite of based on fact. You cannot just say you're arguing "practically" and use that as an excuse to not backup your argument. If you want facts, go show me the same phone with two different resolutions (all other specs, including software on the device) identical, with a negligible practical difference in battery life).


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By Reclaimer77 on 5/15/2014 1:04:03 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Unfortunately I don't work at Samsung, or LG, or anyone who makes phones so I can't just go take a reference model design and plug in a new display and measure the difference.


Well you could have fooled me! Didn't you just disparage me for not being "in the field"?

quote:
Wow. That is low. So basically, you don't actually provide any facts yourself, just "trust me, there's no 'practical' difference." You're then presented with a number of factual statements about how higher resolution displays can impact battery life


But battery life HAS improved as resolution has increased. I'm not saying "trust me", I'm saying go look at the facts!

And yes, I know that is due to a variety of variables. Like I said, PRACTICAL differences. The end user doesn't know, or care, that if their phone was lower res they might get a few minutes more of on-screen time. Who cares!?

There's no PRACTICAL penalty, today, of going with HD or QHD. That was my whole point!

quote:
You're then presented with a number of factual statements about how higher resolution displays can impact battery life, and then you spin things on me and make ME the bad guy because I'm trying to "act superior"


Yeah, sometimes I even impress myself. You have to admit, that was a pretty good reversal move :)

quote:
NO. You haven't provided ANY facts. Your statements are literally the opposite of based on fact. You cannot just say you're arguing "practically" and use that as an excuse to not backup your argument.


Well I think I pulled it off pretty good, lol. :)


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By inighthawki on 5/15/2014 1:16:53 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Well you could have fooled me! Didn't you just disparage me for not being "in the field"?

I simply meant I don't work at an OEM building phones. I do, however, work in the field of graphics processing. I work with OS kernels and GPU drivers all day long.

quote:
But battery life HAS improved as resolution has increased. I'm not saying "trust me", I'm saying go look at the facts!

And I'm not saying that's not true, it's just that it's anecdotal evidence. If one component causes more power drain, but then two other components improve it, you can get a net gain. Correlation does not prove causation.

But higher res screens can end up shaving more than a few minutes. It could be 30-60 minutes easy if you have to bump up the GPU's power state just to compose the display.

The feature you mentioned earlier is a good example of a component that can save a massive amount of power draw while remaining orthogonal to the power draw relating to resolution. Panel self-refresh technology has been used a couple other places (a lot of Intel's devices have it already, including laptops and tablets). The huge advantage is that it can completely disable vsync interrupts on the CPU, which allows the CPU to remain idle. The compositor will not have to wake up on vsync. Keeping the CPU at an idle state is very advantageous. I've seen similar technologies save an hour or more of battery life.

quote:
Yeah, sometimes I even impress myself. You have to admit, that was a pretty good reversal move :)

Yes, it was a pretty good move actually. A little low, but good :)


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By retrospooty on 5/15/2014 1:17:28 PM , Rating: 2
inighthawki, I dont think you are quite getting what is being said. It's not that there isnt a bit of a penalty for going higher res, there has to be... It's that the small penalty is more than compensated for by adding other efficiencies.

As proof of that, over the past few years as screens went from 800x480 to 1280x720 to 1920x1080 battery life has improved with each generation. Even on hte iPhone side... Was the retina4 that literally quadrupled the pixels worse than the 3GS it replaced? Of course not... It is fully expected that the G3 will will have even better battery life than the G2 (which was easily the battery life champ of 2013 smartphones from ALL makers). That is all that is being said here.


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By inighthawki on 5/15/2014 1:28:06 PM , Rating: 2
I understand that actually. The overall point I'm actually trying to make is that when you understand that, you realize that you can make the phones even MORE efficient by not upgrading the resolution. You may not be losing (net loss) battery life with each new model, but it's not as good as it can be. In many cases, it could be way better.

I'm not arguing that we should all go back to 640x480 so we can have extra battery life, just that the tradeoff for going to 1080p->1440p isn't necessarily worth it for what little gain you have in visual quality.


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By retrospooty on 5/15/2014 2:25:14 PM , Rating: 2
OK, granted... But everything you mention is pure theory as we have no data to show what the penalty is. Real data isnt out there, becasue you would have to test the same exact phone on 2 differnet res's and that isnt testable outside of an OEM's lab as you mentioned...

Based on how every generation increases the res and gets more efficient at the same time it must be a very small penalty.


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By Reclaimer77 on 5/15/2014 3:10:04 PM , Rating: 2
Hmmm this has me curious. How DO we figure this out? Outside of the debate with inighthawk, I'm now genuinely curious how much more does rendering higher res truly impact efficiency?

My gut feeling is, not much. But he does have more experience than me in this field.

I HAVE pulled up how much actual power the individual smartphone displays pull, that was easy. It's VERY low.

However that tells us nothing of the actual GPU consumption of one res vs. another.

http://www.displaymate.com/Smartphone_ShootOut_3.h...

Also this is only LCD's, no OLED's :(


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By inighthawki on 5/15/2014 4:04:08 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not sure it would be possible to do (test accurately) without having different panels. I would normally suggest using a tablet and setting the resolution to a lower setting, but you will still run into inaccuracies since there may be hidden work associated with non-native resolutions behind the scenes.

Windows has a feature called ETW which allows you to take a trace of the system as it runs and collect performance information through various events. You can then open the traces in various tools to visualize the data. There is a tool called WPA (Windows Performance Analyzer) which can break down some stuff such as GPU utilization and power state info, and another tool that ships with it called GPUView, which can visualize the actual workloads submitted to the GPU itself (every packet of work sent to the GPU). You can view how long a particular workload actually takes.

The biggest problem is that you are unlikely to get super accurate results, since the tracing itself can interfere with the system and provide results that aren't necessarily what would be real-world results. It may wake up the CPU more often and/or do additional work, or may make the display driver behave differently just by enabling it. It may still provide a semi accurate view, but I still wouldn't use the results as much of a baseline.

The alternative might be to get a tool that measures power usage and use the same scenario of lowering the resolution on a tablet. I think that would be more accurate, but then there's no way of knowing if the resolution change impacted anything else.

The other thing to consider is the workload itself. You'd have to choose your workload carefully to ensure it simulates real world usage, and do it long enough to matter. Rendering the windows start screen, for example, is going to be a whole lot simpler than random apps from the store. Other random apps may also put more drain on other components such as wifi. But I don't think this is stuff I need to point out, you seem smart enough to realize you're not going to get an accurate test by letting the device idle :)


RE: stop making gold phones!!!
By retrospooty on 5/15/2014 5:42:51 PM , Rating: 2
Basically we cant... Just buy the phone you want with the features you want... If you don't want over 1080p, and there is a phone that suits your needs with 1080p, I would say buy that phone. If you don't want over 1080p and the phone that that meets your needs has a 1440p screen, buy it anyhow.

I am 95% sure on getting a G3 regardless of the res. (unless something better comes out between now and its release) I dont personally care if the 5.5 inch screen is 1080 or 1440, I am getting it for everything else it has, and I am 99% sure the battery life will be even better than the 2013 pack leading G2.


"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki