Print 26 comment(s) - last by Zak.. on May 7 at 11:21 AM

Both civilian drones and commercial drones are disallowed, appeal seems futile for now

Yosemite National Park has a friendly message to drone enthusiasts hoping to fly their drones in the park -- don't.  The park staff published an advisory on May 2, reminding visitors that drone use is in violation of National Park policy and may result in stiff fines.
I. Private Drone Use in Most of the Country -- Yup
While drones like Parrot SA's (EPA:PARRO) AR Drone or Da-Jiang ("Great Territory") Innovations (DJI) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.'s Phantom quadcopter are growing more affordable and widespread for enthusiast uses -- especially aerial filming -- the legality of such civilian fliers remains a serious question.
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has the power to regulate the U.S. airspace, as granted by Congress.  A 2012 law (The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2012) orders that the FAA safely integrate commercial drones and enthusiast drones into the civilian airspace by 2015, but it currently has failed to develop that policy and looks unlikely to meet that deadline.  In the meantime it's tried to urge businesses not to use drones and for civilians to limit their use.  In guidelines, it writes:
Do I need to get approval from the FAA to fly a model aircraft for recreation?
No. FAA guidance does not address size of the model aircraft. FAA guidance says that model aircraft flights should be kept below 400 feet above ground level (AGL), should be flown a sufficient distance from populated areas and full-scale aircraft, and are not for business purposes. 

Parrot AR 2.0
A federal ALJ recently ruled that use of drones, like this Parrot AR 2.0 quadcopter is legal for both civilians and commercial use. [Image Source: Parrot/RobotShop]

The last sentence in the guideline, however, may well be unlawful.  The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in March of this year issued an FAA fine for a commercial drone user who defined the FAA's ban.  The administrative law judge (ALJ) ruled that the FAA could not discriminate against drones versus other forms of model aircraft.
For companies like, Inc. (AMZNor Google Inc. (GOOG) looking to deploy drones to either deliver products or internet service to consumers, the fight to develop a fair regulatory framework has just begun.  But for civilians, the FAA's guidelines appear to now acknowledge that use below 400 feet is okay.
II. Private Drone Use in National Parks -- Nope
An exception though is the U.S. National Park System.  In a post on its public homepage, Yosemite National Park's staff -- employees of the U.S. National Parks Service (NPS) -- write:

Yosemite National Park advises visitors that the use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Drones) are prohibited within park boundaries due to regulations outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Specifically, the use of drones within the park boundaries is illegal under all circumstances. Thirty Six CFR 2.17(a)(3) states, “delivering or retrieving a person or object by parachute, helicopter, or other airborne means, except in emergencies involving public safety or serious property loss, or pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit” is illegal. This applies to drones of all shapes and sizes.

The park has experienced an increase in visitors using drones within park boundaries over the last few years. Drones have been witnessed filming climbers ascending climbing routes, filming views above tree-tops, and filming aerial footage of the park. Drones can be extremely noisy, and can impact the natural soundscape. Drones can also impact the wilderness experience for other visitors creating an environment that is not conducive to wilderness travel. The use of drones also interferes with emergency rescue operations and can cause confusion and distraction for rescue personnel and other parties involved in the rescue operation. Additionally, drones can have negative impacts on wildlife nearby the area of use, especially sensitive nesting peregrine falcons on cliff walls.

Visitors traveling to the park should be aware that the use of drones is prohibited while visiting the park and should not be utilized at any time. 

Based on the comments, it appears that 36 C.F.R. 2.17 applies not just to Yosemite, but also to all U.S. National Parks.
For those wondering about a court challenge don't get your hopes up.  That same provision has been successfully applied in federal court to prohibit base jumping (with a parachute) and has been upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2000.  Considering that the Ninth Circuit sets precedent for California -- the home state of Yosemite -- it appears drone enthusiasts have little hope of winning a fight against the park policy in federal court.  Drone enthusiasts' best bet would be to test the waters in national parks in another Federal Circuit, but be prepared for a long and costly fight, which may well end in disappointment.
The 36 C.F.R., which outlines the U.S. National Park rules and regulations, traces its power to The National Park Service Organic Act signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson in 1916.  It is accompanied by 16 U.S.C. § 1, the base provision of that 1916 Congressional law.
Yosemite is one of the most beloved and used U.S. National Parks, seeing 3.7 million visitors per year in recent years.  It is known for its spectacular granite cliffs, including the Half Dome, and for its groves of Giant Sequoia trees.

Yosemite in the winter
Yosemite National Park is seen here in the winter months. [Image Source: Mary Lundin/My Shot]

While Yosemite was a "state park" until the creation of the U.S. National Park System in 1916, it was actually the first federally protected piece of wilderness.  The first law that protected it was the Yosemite Grant Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln in June 1864, just ten months before the President was assasinated.

Source: National Park Service [advisory]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Where
By marvdmartian on 5/6/2014 7:35:00 AM , Rating: 2
Add on top of that, their innate ability to interpret their own convoluted laws and regulations, to THEIR advantage, and we have a much bigger problem.

For example, the Code of Federal Regulations quoted here:
Thirty Six CFR 2.17(a)(3) states, “ delivering or retrieving a person or object by parachute, helicopter, or other airborne means, except in emergencies involving public safety or serious property loss, or pursuant to the terms and conditions of a permit” is illegal. This applies to drones of all shapes and sizes.

Notice the words in bold? That tells me that if you're NOT delivering or retrieving a person or object, you're free to fly your drone. The feds, on the other hand, simply smother ALL use of the drones with this regulation, and hope that no one will call them on it.

Could make for some interesting drama, if someone did decide to!

RE: Where
By ammaross on 5/6/2014 10:01:34 AM , Rating: 2
delivering or retrieving a person or object

Well, there goes flying drones with cameras (one of the main uses of these drones).

RE: Where
By marvdmartian on 5/6/2014 1:52:55 PM , Rating: 2
ONLY if it's retrieving said camera! ;)

"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki