Print 22 comment(s) - last by thesaxophonist.. on May 10 at 8:43 PM

  (Source: TuJobs)
The new system is currently in use with a M113

Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT) and subcontractor Rockwell Collins, Inc. (COL) squandered over $50M USD [PDF] in U.S. taxpayer money making a heads up display which was supposed to display video feeds from camera around the F-35 fighter jet.  The display never quite worked properly.  After many delays, exasperated U.S. Air Force (USAF) commanders finally wrote of the cost of the VSI-HMC program, signing a new contract to pay BAE Systems plc (LON:BA) millions more to produce a replacement augmented reality helmet.
Perhaps the USAF should have looked to Kickstarter funded, John Carmack brainchild Oculus VR, instead.
Hot off its recent acquisition by Facebook, Inc. (FB) Oculus VR already has an interesting application in the works courtesy of the Norwegian Armed Forces.  The Norwegian Army's Panserbataljonen ("panzer battalion") unit is testing out using Oculus VR as a heads up display for its tanks and armored personnel vehicles.

Norway tank
Norwegian soldiers pilot an M113 with Oculus VR [Image Source: TuJobs]

The project is co-produced by Norway's Making View, a small startup contractor in Hamar, Norway.  It has modified a special M113 with cameras on the outside to give a 360 view.  

Comments development manager, Daniel Mestervik:

Those who play "Battlefield" do indeed have a better view than in an actual vehicle. However, with our software you can add the information and views you are used to from games: an overview map, spatial (geographical) orientation, tilt and speed.

Versus the millions that the failed Lockheed HUD project cost the USAF, the Norwegian Army paid under $10,000 USD for several $2,000 USD Oculus dev kits.  As the software is open to developers, they were quickly able to write software to display the exterior of the vehicle to their drivers.
Norway currently has around 300 M113 armored vehicles (made in the U.S.), which form the backbone of its troop carrying.  Assuming success, the project could be rolled out to the fleet and could also begin testing with the rest of Norway's armored battalions, which include Leopard 2 tanks (German-made) and CV9030N (made by a Swedish subsidiary of BAE Systems) armored fighting vehicles.
And the project is indeed showing strong signs of success.
The entire project is now basically finished, with drivers literally driving around a test course in Rena, Norway with the armored personnel carrier (APC).  Using Oculus VR, the drivers could pull of the feat of parallel parking the APC with centimeter precision.

Oculus VR driving
Oculus VR driving the M113 [Image Source: TuJobs]

The drivers enthuse that the results are great, akin to playing a videogame. The best part is that it probably cost less than $100,000 USD for all the hardware involved.
While that's a lot better than paying $50M+ USD and getting nothing in return, don't expect that kind of cost-effective spending anytime soon in the U.S.  After all, as Elon Musk's SpaceX recently learned the hard way, exclusive government contracts are a tough nut to crack.

Sources: TuTV, TuJobs

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Ophion on 5/6/2014 12:12:26 AM , Rating: 2
First off, that's not what contradictory means, you might want to look that up. Also, if you trace a certain invention back and forth in history, you're bound to end up in either America or Europe at some point... usually in both.

The first commercially produced PC was the Programma 101, which was Italian.

Modern operating systems are all based on concepts by Alan Turing, born in Britain.

On one hand we have the Internet, founded by DARPA, but on the other hand we have the World Wide Web, pioneered by Tim Berners-Lee.

Ford commercialized the automobile with the cheap Model T, but that's hardly a novel invention, as both the car (and car industry) had existed for decades earlier in Europe.

The assembly line method of construction dates back to the 1100s, when the Venetian Arsenal (Italy) used it to construct ships. It's nothing new. What America invented was the conveyor belt, not for construction purposes, but for transporting coal.


There are relatively few cases where you can say that an invention belongs to a single country, especially in modern days when work often happen globally, even though the end product is usually released first in America.

Also, even the most novel inventions are rarely created out of thin air. Usually they're constructed from already existing things, but with minor additions, which means that once you start looking at all the bits and pieces that went into it, you end up with something made from contributions by people from all over the world.

By DougF on 5/6/2014 3:41:26 AM , Rating: 2
A minor clarification here and agreement that innovation, thanks to the WWW, Internet, and open skies and sea lanes (thank you US Military); does move back and forth between various nations/areas of the planet.
Henry Ford's innovation was not the assembly line (a common mistake), but to move the warehouse into the assembly area, shortening the time required to supply parts to the line. This was seen by a one Mr. Toyoda (yes with a "d", of the Toyota company we know and love/hate today), who took Ford's idea back to Japan and then created the Toyota Production System for their car manufacturing plants. Along with Deming's influence this became the LEAN system now promulgating throughout the world to eliminate waste.

"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki