backtop


Print 34 comment(s) - last by room200.. on May 7 at 5:35 PM

He wants to make EVs more attractive to middle class Americans

For the most part, mainstream consumers aren’t exactly flocking to electric vehicles since they aren't always practical for everyday use. Two of the biggest downsides to EVs include a higher MSRP compared to a comparable gasoline-engine vehicles and a limited driving range before it must be recharged.
 
The U.S. government already offers a tax credit of $7,500 on eligible EVs to help soften the blow when it comes to pricing, and one congressman wants to further increase that federal tax credit.
 
Vermont Rep. Peter Welch (D) announced this week that he wants to make it easier for consumers to purchase EVs by increasing the tax credit to $10,000 via the Electric CARS Act.
 
In addition to boosting the credit by $2,500, it would allow the tax credit to be applied at the point-of-sale instead of when the individual’s taxes are filed. The bill would also be tailored to better accommodate “many middle-income Vermonters do not have enough tax liability to qualify for the full tax credit.”


Vermont Rep. Peter Welch plugging in a Ford Fusion Energi
 
“One of the biggest contributors to climate change in Vermont and across the country is vehicle emissions. It is essential that we transition to cleaner, more efficient transportation like electric vehicles,” said Rep. Welch said an electric vehicle charging station near the Vermont Statehouse.
 
“The battery life and fuel efficiency of electric vehicles are steadily improving making them more accessible and practical to drive. This legislation will make them more affordable while saving Vermonters money at the gas pump and reducing their environmental footprint.”
 
Welch says that he plans to introduce new legislation to increase the EV tax credit when he returns to Washington.
 
It should be noted that Rep. Welch isn’t the only politician that has called for an increase in the federal tax credit for EVs. President Obama also called for increasing the credit to $10,000 back in 2012.

Sources: Christian Science Monitor, Congressman Peter Welch's Office Website



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

And while we're at it::
By room200 on 5/5/2014 12:43:28 PM , Rating: 3
Let's give oil companies extra money so they can make bigger profits.......wait, why don't we give farmers extra money to grow stuff to make a profit......wait, wait....why don't we give tax breaks for buying houses.....

All you guys with your phony outrage over this make me laugh. This country subsidizes desired behaviors all of the time. We subsidize married people over single people. We subsidize businesses to make more money. We subsidize people with kids vs. those without. Those who have houses receive a tax break, you live in an apartment you're screwed. Most of you are just as selective about what you're outraged about too. Get over it.




RE: And while we're at it::
By Spuke on 5/5/2014 1:04:07 PM , Rating: 2
It doesn't have to be all or nothing, that's an extremists attitude. If tax breaks need to exist, then there should be a limit on how much, how many, etc.


RE: And while we're at it::
By Rukkian on 5/5/2014 1:14:01 PM , Rating: 2
I don't agree with this tax break either, but not for the reason it typically comes down to: people that don't benefit from this don't like it and think it is wrong.

I don't have a problem with this when compared to all of the other credits, just all the credits in general. I don't see why we should be helping people buy a house, buy a car, have kids, etc, etc, etc. Just get rid of all the deductions, switch to a much lower flat tax (either usage or all income from all sources) and can (or at least cut it down to almost nothing) the IRS. A big chunk of the government is gone, filing taxes is easy (or not necessary) and nobody needs to get upset that somebody else is getting a tax break.


RE: And while we're at it::
By Spuke on 5/5/2014 10:49:43 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
ust get rid of all the deductions, switch to a much lower flat tax (either usage or all income from all sources) and can (or at least cut it down to almost nothing) the IRS.
I would be fine with this.


RE: And while we're at it::
By ebakke on 5/5/2014 1:36:40 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Most of you are just as selective about what you're outraged about too. Get over it.
Does this mean you're joining me in universal outrage, and oppose government interventions of all kinds that attempt to incent different individual behaviors at the expense of others?


RE: And while we're at it::
By Griffinhart on 5/5/2014 4:57:28 PM , Rating: 2
That's where I've been at for years now!


RE: And while we're at it::
By snyper256 on 5/7/2014 10:37:37 AM , Rating: 2
Sounds good to me. Their 'central planning' meddling is only holding Humans back.


"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki