backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by jabber.. on Jul 26 at 12:02 PM

The Mercury News puts Jen-Hsun Huang on the hot seat

The graphics industry was just turned on its head yesterday with the announcement that AMD was acquiring ATI Technologies. But while that news is of great significance, ATI rival NVIDIA has plans of its own when it comes to the future of graphics. Dean Takahashi of The Mercury News had the opportunity to interview Jen-Hsun Huang, CEO of NVIDIA. The two talk about the GeForce FX failure, why the company is dealing with Sony in the console arena this time around instead of Microsoft and how far away we are from the "Toy Story" standard.

In regards to having greater photorealism in games, Huang feels that we are still at least 10 years away. Techniques like depth of field, motion blur and HDR are being refined, but we still have a ways to go before computers can move with the fluidity of human beings. Many movies today feature human characters acting in front of blue screens as action takes place around them. The effect is (for the most) part seamless to movie viewers, but gamers still have a ways to go before we see that kind of photorealism on the PC. “With "Superman Returns,'' you can't really put a camera on a person and have him fly through a metropolis. That entire movie was animated. It was one big computer-generated movie with a guy in tights in front of a blue screen. You look at that imagery, and you know we are nowhere near that level of imagery,” said Huang.

Although the interview was conducted before the AMD-ATI merger went public, it would be interesting to see what Jen-Hsun Huang has to say about the deal. Speculation is running rampant as to what the merger means for the industry as a whole – a merger that affects not only AMD and ATI, but also Intel and NVIDIA. Intel hasn’t commented on the merger but we do expect to being hearing from them before the week is out.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why not nVidia?
By Knish on 7/25/2006 12:53:51 PM , Rating: 5
Furen you usually post fairly throught out posts, but that was pretty subpar for you. AMD bought ATI to get a foot hold into the following, in this order of importance:
1.) Mobile
2.) TVs
3.) XBOX
4.) Core Logic
5.) GPU

If AMD wanted to spend $5 billion to design a graphics chip, i can pretty much damn well assure you it'd be better than what intel, NVIDIA or ATI has. ATI was struggling financially, had a decent foothold in markets AMD wanted in, and had management that wouldnt put up a fight. The shaders and memory controllers are really really insignificant in the scale of the deal.

In all honesty, AMD and Intel are still companies that apply themselves to 99.9% of the industry, not the enthusiasts like you and me. graphics will take a step back for a while, but your mom and grandma's next AMD computers will give the Intel alternatives a decent run for the money.

NVIDIA? Considering they have a tendency to agitate everyone in the industry and they just lost their number one channel partner, and they directly compete with all of Intel's graphics solutions (which is a multi billion businss for intel), I don't really see the NVIDIA/Intel partnership going anywhere. Good luck to them selling $900 video cards to 7 kids at voodoopc


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken

Related Articles
AMD-ATI: A Done Deal
July 24, 2006, 5:00 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki