Print 19 comment(s) - last by jabber.. on Jul 26 at 12:02 PM

The Mercury News puts Jen-Hsun Huang on the hot seat

The graphics industry was just turned on its head yesterday with the announcement that AMD was acquiring ATI Technologies. But while that news is of great significance, ATI rival NVIDIA has plans of its own when it comes to the future of graphics. Dean Takahashi of The Mercury News had the opportunity to interview Jen-Hsun Huang, CEO of NVIDIA. The two talk about the GeForce FX failure, why the company is dealing with Sony in the console arena this time around instead of Microsoft and how far away we are from the "Toy Story" standard.

In regards to having greater photorealism in games, Huang feels that we are still at least 10 years away. Techniques like depth of field, motion blur and HDR are being refined, but we still have a ways to go before computers can move with the fluidity of human beings. Many movies today feature human characters acting in front of blue screens as action takes place around them. The effect is (for the most) part seamless to movie viewers, but gamers still have a ways to go before we see that kind of photorealism on the PC. “With "Superman Returns,'' you can't really put a camera on a person and have him fly through a metropolis. That entire movie was animated. It was one big computer-generated movie with a guy in tights in front of a blue screen. You look at that imagery, and you know we are nowhere near that level of imagery,” said Huang.

Although the interview was conducted before the AMD-ATI merger went public, it would be interesting to see what Jen-Hsun Huang has to say about the deal. Speculation is running rampant as to what the merger means for the industry as a whole – a merger that affects not only AMD and ATI, but also Intel and NVIDIA. Intel hasn’t commented on the merger but we do expect to being hearing from them before the week is out.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why not nVidia?
By AtaStrumf on 7/25/2006 12:34:30 PM , Rating: 2
What I wonder is why didn't AMD buy nVidia instead of ATi? Would seem like a better choice to me. ATi is still pretty new in the chipset business and still has some stupid problems with it's southbridge.

RE: Why not nVidia?
By Furen on 7/25/2006 12:38:07 PM , Rating: 1
Because nVidia is worth as much as AMD is. Also, ATI's shader and memory controller technology is better than nVidia's. So basically ATI had better tech and was much cheaper.

RE: Why not nVidia?
By Knish on 7/25/2006 12:53:51 PM , Rating: 5
Furen you usually post fairly throught out posts, but that was pretty subpar for you. AMD bought ATI to get a foot hold into the following, in this order of importance:
1.) Mobile
2.) TVs
3.) XBOX
4.) Core Logic
5.) GPU

If AMD wanted to spend $5 billion to design a graphics chip, i can pretty much damn well assure you it'd be better than what intel, NVIDIA or ATI has. ATI was struggling financially, had a decent foothold in markets AMD wanted in, and had management that wouldnt put up a fight. The shaders and memory controllers are really really insignificant in the scale of the deal.

In all honesty, AMD and Intel are still companies that apply themselves to 99.9% of the industry, not the enthusiasts like you and me. graphics will take a step back for a while, but your mom and grandma's next AMD computers will give the Intel alternatives a decent run for the money.

NVIDIA? Considering they have a tendency to agitate everyone in the industry and they just lost their number one channel partner, and they directly compete with all of Intel's graphics solutions (which is a multi billion businss for intel), I don't really see the NVIDIA/Intel partnership going anywhere. Good luck to them selling $900 video cards to 7 kids at voodoopc

RE: Why not nVidia?
By Xavian on 7/25/2006 3:05:19 PM , Rating: 2
AMD is worth some $2.5b more than Nvidia, so they are certainly not equal Furen.

RE: Why not nVidia?
By sircuit on 7/25/2006 12:39:58 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe Intel will.......

RE: Why not nVidia?
By Enron on 7/25/2006 5:16:40 PM , Rating: 3
Intel has no reason to buy Nvidia, they have nothing to gain from them.

RE: Why not nVidia?
By defter on 7/25/2006 1:21:00 PM , Rating: 2
The reason:

Incidentally, according to Patrick Moorehead, vice president of advanced marketing at AMD, the company did indeed entertain the idea of merging with nVidia. But that would have been a merger of equals, and AMD's top brass would not have been in charge.

AMD wanted to be in charge, thus they picked a smaller company.

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007
Related Articles
AMD-ATI: A Done Deal
July 24, 2006, 5:00 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki