Chinese Government Says Windows 8 is too Expensive, Will Cling to XP
April 23, 2014 9:45 AM
comment(s) - last by
China is looking at home grown patch solutions now
For many people in the corporate world, there is no real reason or need to upgrade from the 14-year-old Windows XP to a more modern version like Windows 7 or Windows 8. Some cite costs as a reason for not upgrading, while others point to the fact that their “mature” integrated systems simply don’t need anything new or fancy to operate properly.
One of the largest organizations that has no desire to move away from Windows XP is the Chinese government. China instead plans to patch XP on its own rather than upgrade to Windows 8, because upgrading would be too expensive (Windows 8 sells for 888 yuan in China, or roughly $142).
Just a little bit of Windows XP nostalgia...
Chinese firms have reportedly released special protection patches to shore up XP’s defenses and the Chinese government says that it is now assessing those patches for its own use.
Estimates peg the number of Chinese computers using XP at nearly 70% compared to 18% in the U.S. As of early April, 25% of all PCs on the market were
still running Windows XP
Despite the reluctance for many to leave XP behind, Microsoft finally ended official support for Windows XP earlier this month. So many people weren't keen to move from XP in the business world that
Microsoft offered to extend support
for some companies for a hefty price.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Not for anyone
4/24/2014 2:49:23 AM
I find 32-bit XP slow as molasses on most machines. The lack of pre-fetch and RAM caching really makes a HUGE difference to everyday use IMO, especially when multi-tasking with several large apps (even worse if you run out of memory and hit the page file). There isn't a lot of support for 64-bit XP so I doubt that is an option for users wanting the benefit of more RAM while retaining XP.
But you are correct that for most people it works fine and anything more than 2GB of RAM (with XP) is probably way overkill to most users. I don't know what the SSD support is like on XP (never installed XP on one) but I guess it would run pretty zippy.
That said, technology has to move forward. Without new products the market will become stagnant. 64-bit Windows 7 is a wonderful OS and a great successor to 32-bit XP. Migrated XP users still get to do what they allows did while power users get the benefits of 4GB+ of memory with a 64-bit OS (CAD, games, video editing). Plus, Microsoft can concentrate on supporting one less OS. Win Win, I can't say the same about Windows 8 though.
"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini
With XP End of Life, Microsoft Asks Holdouts: How Badly Do You Want XP?
April 8, 2014, 8:00 PM
Report: Windows XP Still Running on Over 25 Percent of PCs
April 1, 2014, 2:08 PM
Quick Note: Whoops, Microsoft Pushed Unwanted Windows 10 to Some Users
October 15, 2015, 9:04 PM
Quick Note: Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 10565 Fixes Boot Camp 6.0 Issues
October 13, 2015, 11:39 AM
Microsoft's HD-500 ("Display Dock"), the Magic Sauce Behind Continuum
October 6, 2015, 5:30 PM
Quick Note: Windows 10 Hits 110 Million Devices, VMs
October 6, 2015, 4:30 PM
Windows 10 on Raspberry Pi, IoT Devices Sees Developer Debut
August 12, 2015, 2:41 PM
Sony Issues Bizzare "Do Not Update" Edict to VAIO PC Owners
August 11, 2015, 9:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information