backtop


Print 14 comment(s) - last by Solandri.. on Apr 21 at 5:40 PM

Pandora feels confident and plans to fight in court

Record labels are in the process of suing streaming music provider Pandora for back royalties. Specifically, the record labels want to raid Pandora’s wallet for songs played that were made before 1972.
 
Last week Sony, Universal, and Warner Music, and ABKCO sued Pandora Media in New York State Supreme Court for playing the songs without a license. The suit alleges that Pandora violated the common-law copyright protections when Pandora used older recordings without permission.
 
Recordings made before February 15, 1972 aren't subject to federal copyright protection and some industry estimates believe that record labels could be missing out on tens of millions of dollars in royalties from these songs.
 
“This case presents a classic attempt by Pandora to reap where it has not sown,” the labels say in the suit. “Pandora appropriates plaintiffs’ valuable and unique property, violates New York law and engages in common law copyright infringement and misappropriation and unfair competition.”
 
The suit that has been filed seeks royalties for music made from the 1940's to the early 1970's and includes artists like the Beatles, Hank Williams, the Rolling Stones, and others. Pandora says that it is confident in its legal position and of course plans to fight.
 
María Elena Holly, widow of rock 'n' roll pioneer Buddy Holly, pleaded, “Just because Buddy and the other ’50s musicians recorded songs before 1972 doesn’t mean their songs have no value. These companies’ failure to pay the rock ’n’ roll pioneers is an injustice and it needs to change.”
 
Pandora recently increased its monthly subscription rates and ended the yearly prepaid option.

Source: NYT



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The dead don't care
By Ristogod on 4/21/2014 9:25:21 AM , Rating: 5
I'm sure all the people who made the music are just turning in the grave over the potential earnings lost.

That, or it's just the same greedy a-holes milking every last dime out of someone else's creativity.




RE: The dead don't care
By xti on 4/21/2014 9:39:26 AM , Rating: 2
exactly.

this torrent is for you!


RE: The dead don't care
By michael67 on 4/21/2014 11:31:07 AM , Rating: 2
Hey for some of the ones that survived the 50s and 60s its there only income.

There is not a hell of a lot to fall back on if your a (ex) junky that survived his/hers career.

As banging groupies is not a skill you can later use in live if your 15min to couple of years of fame are over.

So for some its one of the phew extras they still getting.

And yeah i dont feel for the record companies, but imho some of the artist should still be paid or there work.


RE: The dead don't care
By Solandri on 4/21/2014 5:40:13 PM , Rating: 2
The only way a song is still popular 50-60 years later is if it was wildly popular in the interim, meaning those artists have already made tons of money off of it. (Or at least they should have if they hadn't been ripped off by the studios. If that's what happened, they should be right there with consumers arguing for copyright reform.)

Name one other profession where you can do a job once, and live off the proceeds from that for the rest of your life. Nobody else lives by the same expectations of content creators - everyone else has to constantly work, save, and invest to survive their retirement years. If these artists instead wasted their money on hookers and blow, that's their problem. Not something which warrants a change in federal law to keep them fed. We already have programs for hard luck cases like that - they're called welfare and food stamps.


"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki