backtop


Print 82 comment(s) - last by Schrag4.. on Apr 22 at 9:53 PM

No signs of life yet

The question of whether life exists on other planets will always remain a curiosity as we continue venturing into space. Movies like "E.T." and "Alien" are just a couple examples of our fascination with such an idea. 

NASA, as our government space agency, is obviously curious as well. But we could be a step closer to answering such questions as NASA has found the first Earth-Size planet in the 'habitable zone' of another star. 

According to NASA, the Kepler Space Telescope found an Earth-sized planet orbiting a star in the habitable zone, which is the range of distance from a star where liquid water might collect on the surface of an orbiting planet -- meaning the possibility of life. 

The new planet has been dubbed Kepler-186f, and it is about 500 light-years from Earth in the constellation Cygnus. It orbits a star -- which is classified as an M dwarf, or red dwarf -- half the size and mass of our sun.

Kepler-186f orbits its star once every 130-days and receives one-third the energy from its star that Earth gets from the sun. This puts it near the outer edge of the habitable zone. 
 
The brightness of its star at high noon is only as bright as Earth's sun appears about an hour before sunset. Further, NASA isn't quite sure yet, but it believes Kepler-186f's surface rocky.
 

A sketch of Kepler-186f [SOURCE: NASA]

Kepler-186f isn't alone over there, though. It has four companion planets, called Kepler-186b, Kepler-186c, Kepler-186d, and Kepler-186e. They make their way around their sun every four, seven, 13, and 22 days respectively, and they're too hot for any life to exist on them. 
 
Size is key here. While planets have been discovered in the habitable zone before, they haven't been the same size as Earth, which makes it harder for us to understand fully. The four companion planets, for example, all measure less than 1.5 times the size of Earth. Also, previously discovered planets in the habitable zone were were at least 40 percent larger in size than Earth. 

With Kepler-186f being about the same size as Earth, we can have a clearer idea of behaviors, topography, etc. But as of right now, its mass and composition are unknown. 

Unfortunately, whether it contains other life is also unknown at this time. But it's always a worthy consideration when stumbling upon new planets in what are considered "habitable" areas. 

"The discovery of Kepler-186f is a significant step toward finding worlds like our planet Earth," said Paul Hertz, NASA's Astrophysics Division director at the agency's headquarters in Washington. "Future NASA missions, like the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite and the James Webb Space Telescope, will discover the nearest rocky exoplanets and determine their composition and atmospheric conditions, continuing humankind's quest to find truly Earth-like worlds."

Source: NASA



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Absurd Methodology
By delphinus100 on 4/18/2014 11:33:29 PM , Rating: 3
Still, there's the fact that silicon is less adept at forming different and more complex molecules than carbon. That's a matter of chemestry that should be true anywhere.


RE: Absurd Methodology
By StevoLincolnite on 4/19/2014 10:35:27 PM , Rating: 1
True.
But... And I quote, from Jurassic Park: "Life will find a way".

Silicon however has many of the similar chemical characteristics of carbon and is even located in the same group on the periodic table, thus the molecules themselves are large enough to store biological information.

However it does lack the ability to form bonds with a large amount of other atoms.

Chlorine, Arsenic and Sulfur are also possible replacements for Carbon, Sulfur is able to form long chain molecules similar to Carbon, heck bacteria has already been found to thrive on sulfur instead of oxygen, by reducing sulfur to hydrogen sulfide.


RE: Absurd Methodology
By maugrimtr on 4/22/2014 11:34:01 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Chlorine, Arsenic and Sulfur are also possible replacements for Carbon, Sulfur is able to form long chain molecules similar to Carbon, heck bacteria has already been found to thrive on sulfur instead of oxygen, by reducing sulfur to hydrogen sulfide.


Yes, but the lifeform is still Carbon based ;). Not to be a pain, but sulfur "breathing" (technically, since it displaces oxygen) is actually considered ancient. All those free Oxygen molecules in the air? It only exists because it's a waste product, from countless billions of photosynthesizing plants and bacteria. Before free oxygen, reducing Sulfur would have been a commonplace means of producing energy.


“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki