Print 72 comment(s) - last by JediJeb.. on Apr 23 at 6:19 PM

"The Taliban hates the A-10. That’s good enough for me." -- Senator Lindsey Graham

In February of 2012, a report surfaced that said the U.S. military was looking to retire single-purpose aircraft in favor of multirole aircraft in large part due to budget cuts. One of the aircraft that was among those to be killed off was the A-10 Warthog. However, it looks as though some lawmakers want the venerable Warthog to fly for many more years.
The A-10 is a dedicated ground attack jet that has been providing close air support for decades. Senator Kelly Ayotte (R) has announced that she will push for amendments to be made to legislation that would retire the A-10 fleet.
The USAF has proposed the removal of the A-10 from its fleet by 2019 in part due to a 2011 deficit-reduction law. There are lawmakers on both sides of the isle that want to keep the A-10 flying, but they will have to find cuts in the budget elsewhere to make that happen.

The USAF maintains that by cutting the A-10 from the fleet it will save $3.5 billion over several years.
Senator Lindsey Graham (R) says that he has "been in theater enough to know what the troops say about the A-10." Graham added, "The Taliban hates the A-10. That’s good enough for me."
According to reports, many senior Army leaders, special operations troops, and soldiers in the field oppose the retirement of the fleet. Army Chief of Staff General Raymond Oiderno recently stated, "Obviously, we prefer the A-10. [Soldiers] can see it, they can hear it, they have confidence in it."

Source: Defense News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By AntiM on 4/14/2014 11:45:53 AM , Rating: 0
i think the issue here is the changing battlefield...

This is totally correct. The days of a large group of soldiers meeting another large group of soldiers on a battlefield are pretty much gone. The desire to keep the A-10 is political matter, not a matter of practicality.

By Bad-Karma on 4/14/2014 12:11:11 PM , Rating: 5
The same thing was said after WWII; "The nuclear bomb has rendered large ground forces obsolete."

When the F-4 phantom was originally developed, it was designed without a gun because planners thought that; "Missiles and high speed have rendered the dog fight obsolete."

Richard Gatling designed his new auto repeating weapon to be so terrible that it would reduce the size of armies and so reduce the number of deaths by combat and disease, and "to show how futile war is."

So I find your statement a bit ignorant of the realities surrounding the issue(s).

By MrBlastman on 4/14/2014 1:20:55 PM , Rating: 2

You can bomb a country into submission. You can hold the skies with superiority.

... but you still need infantry to occupy and control it.

There will ALWAYS be a place for large armies and infantry, no matter if it is on this world or countless others around the galaxy.

The armies might not stand line abreast with Napoleonic-era regimented tactics. They will, however, continue in the tradition of Francis Marion. Guerilla warfare is here to stay. Or have you not learned anything from Afghanistan?

Even if we turned that country to a puddle of glass the rats would still figure out a way to live through all of it--and we'd need manpower to oppose them.

Aircraft are really useful softening them up and taking out key targets, though. :)

"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain
Related Articles

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki