backtop


Print 81 comment(s) - last by crazydrummer45.. on Jul 29 at 8:41 PM


AMD and ATI are already planning scalable designs for 2008
"Torrenza" platforms and unified GPU/CPU processors

AMD announced the $5.4B USD takeover of ATI earlier today, but the new company is already making large plans for the future.  Dave Orton, soon-to-be Executive Vice President of AMD's ATI Division, claimed that AMD and ATI would begin leveraging the sales of both companies by 2007.  However, a slide from the AMD/ATI merger documentation has already shown some interesting development plans for 2008.

Specifically, it appears as though AMD and ATI are planning unified, scalable platforms using a mixture of AMD CPUs, ATI chipsets and ATI GPUs.  This sort of multi-GPU, multi-CPU architecture is extremely reminiscent of AMD's Torrenza technology announced this past June, which allows low-latency communications between chipset, CPU and main memory. The premise for Torrenza is to open the channel for embedded chipset development from 3rd party companies. AMD said the technology is an open architecture, allowing what it called "accelerators" to be plugged into the system to perform special duties, similar to the way we have a dedicated GPU for graphics.

Furthermore, AMD President Dirk Meyer also confirmed that in addition to multi-processor platforms, stating "As we look towards ever finer manufacturing geometries we see the opportunity to integrate CPU and GPU cores together onto the same die to better serve the needs of some segments."  A clever DailyTech reader recently pointed out that AMD just recently filed its first graphics-oriented patent a few weeks ago.  The patent, titled "CPU and graphics unit with shared cache" seems to indicate that these pet projects at AMD are a little more than just pipe dreams.

During the AMD/ATI merger conference call, Meyer furthermore added that not too long ago, floating point processing was done on a separate piece of silicon.  Meyer claimed that the trend for the FPU integration into the CPU may not be too different than the evolution of the GPU into the CPU.

Bob Rivet, AMD's Chief Financial Officer, claims the combined company will save nearly $75M USD in licensing and development overlap in 2007 alone, and another $125M in 2008.  Clearly the combined development between the two companies has a few cogs in motion already.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Makes room for New Memory Tech
By phatboye on 7/24/2006 8:59:56 AM , Rating: 2
If intel were to even think about buying nvidia the government would scream bloody murder.


RE: Makes room for New Memory Tech
By tuteja1986 on 7/24/2006 9:42:49 AM , Rating: 2
Intel has nothing to gain if they buy Nvidia because Nvidia doesn't bring crapall that Intel doesn't have. Buying Nvida would be a more of hassel and expensive. They have already started development on a mini core and amd knows that if they don't start this development , they are screwed in 5 years time. I learn why AMD bought ATI so quickly :( for survival.


RE: Makes room for New Memory Tech
By Griswold on 7/24/2006 12:25:13 PM , Rating: 2
Nvidia has something Intel doesnt: the know-how to make high performance GPUs. But that is by no means enough incentive to get in the ring with the FTC about buying the no. 2 on the market.

And about your other assumption as to why AMD took this step - thats not really plausible.


RE: Makes room for New Memory Tech
By akugami on 7/24/2006 12:43:01 PM , Rating: 3
You're somehow implying Intel wouldn't be able to hire the engineers needed to make a high performance GPU. The reason Intel is unlikely to be interested in the higher end GPU arena is due to the highly competitive nature of this niche market. Intel vastly outsells nVidia and ATI in overall GPU sales, granted it's all integrated chipsets. The majority of GPU sales are in the low and mid range. It would be completely naive to think that Intel can't ramp up their current GPU's from being just low end to being low to mid end.


RE: Makes room for New Memory Tech
By Samus on 7/24/2006 2:22:09 PM , Rating: 2
precisely. nvidia's revenues are pennies on the dollar to intel's processor, chipset and flash divisions.

there is no real profit in gpu development for intel...besides, the gma950 is actually a decent onboard processor, about x550 class, and runs windows vista aeroglass.


RE: Makes room for New Memory Tech
By Tyler 86 on 7/26/2006 11:40:51 PM , Rating: 2
'x550' class?
You must be huffing the rapidly incinerating substrate off of a SERIOUSLY overclocked GMA 950.

You comparing it to ATi's x550 .. ?

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2427...

It's rivaled by ATi's Xpress IGP & X300 IGP low end video, which is also much cheaper, I might add.
800x600 HQ noAA/AF @ 14fps in Doom 3...
ATi's X550 pulls about 15 fps at 1280x1024 4xAA noAF
~25fps @ 1024x768 4xAA ...


There's no way it can hold a candle to it.


RE: Makes room for New Memory Tech
By hstewarth on 7/24/2006 3:39:45 PM , Rating: 2
Actually this makes case for Intel monopoly a less of a case. Because AMD and Intel on same company, it means both Intel and nVidia are could likely be cut out ATI and AMD products respectfully.

It is better off the CPU companies are seperated from GPU because it gives move user choices.

I think in the long term this is going lead to doom for AMD/ATI. Or complete seperation of markets between the two.


By hstewarth on 7/24/2006 3:41:07 PM , Rating: 2
Opps first line should be ATI and Intel on same company, it would be a real Intel Monopoly if Intel and AMD were on same company. :)


"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki