Apple is Relying on Blog Posts to Squeeze $2B+ USD From Samsung
April 10, 2014 5:33 PM
comment(s) - last by
Heavily redacted blog posts they are, at that
Apple, Inc.'s (
) high priced legal team liked
by blog TmoNews enough that they're using it as "evidence" in court. The post describes how Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) dropped Universal Search from
the Galaxy S3
, only to later add it back with a software update.
The author of the post -- David Beren -- expresses enthusiasm for Universal Search's return, which Apple is citing as key evidence that Android users saw the feature as a selling point.
seeking $2.191B USD
accused infringements on five of its patents
U.S. Patent No. 6,847,959
(filed: Jan. 2000, granted: Jan. 2005) -- the patent it says Android's Universal Search infringes upon.
Apple can't handle what the public
-- or at least some supporters of Google Inc.'s (
) Android operating system -- think of it.
, Apple has heavily redacted the comments, removing such gems as:
Who cares, we've had content searches on OS since way before the iPhone did it. Hate this lawsuit garbage.
The people that were deprived of such privileges due to crapple's non-sense
ismell another stupid lawsuit by crapple
Apple's lawyers claim they just don't want jurors to be "confused." So to avoid confusion they will black out at least half of what a person wrote so that their comment can be taken entirely out of context. The lawyers write:
[The exhibit] should be redacted to remove irrelevant, inaccurate, and prejudicial reader 'Comments' that were appended to the online article, including irrelevant and inaccurate references to this litigation and the 1846 case.
Any conceivable probative value of reader Comments speculating about and disparaging this case (and there is none) would be substantially outweighed by the high risk of confusing, misleading, and tainting the jury.
The Samsung Galaxy S3
Samsung naturally isn't happy with the redactions, but it has to tread lightly as it performed redactions of its own to remove certain unfavorable commentary about its 2012 lawsuit loss to Apple.
Apple is afraid that buyers prefer larger Androids to its smaller devices.
[Image Source: Getty Images]
Apple used a survey of users to estimate the value of the five patents in the case. It considers its
the least valuable, and the universal search patent the second least valuable.
At this point the case is viewed largely as an effort by Apple to squeeze some sort of large per-device licensing fees from Samsung. Recently published documents in the case reveal Apple is
upset about its slowing growth
considering adopting a "me-too" approach to Samsung
, move to larger screen sizes and devices priced at under $300 USD unlocked -- the key segments its says are growing globally.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Crapple vs innovations
4/11/2014 1:41:15 PM
"Both companies should have all their cases thrown out of court then fined $3 billion for wasting everybody's time"
Truer words have never been spoken. If only it worked that way. I am really tired of both of these companies and the crap they spew.
RE: Crapple vs innovations
4/11/2014 4:40:54 PM
Both? Umm what has Samsung ever done other than defend itself?
Also Samsung has been the only one to stand up and challenge the value of FRAND vs Apple's BS design patents.
What does it say about our Government's view of technology when important and fundamental technology patents are viewed as being worth billions less than rounder corners and slide to unlock?
RE: Crapple vs innovations
4/11/2014 5:18:53 PM
Actually, you are right. I take that back... For whatever reason I thought Samsung was suing the crap out of everyone else too (my bad, listening to the mindless iTools here at at/dt). So I just looked it up. It really isnt, especially considering it is by far the largest player in the smartphone arena. Apple is really at the center of it all. Some of these other graphs show Nokia as very active, but not Samsung.
"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein
Apple: Consumers Want What We Don't Have (Cheaper Smartphones, Larger Screens)
April 8, 2014, 8:03 AM
Samsung Says Its Ads Mocking Apple Fanboys Drove Apple's Phil Schiller "Crazy"
April 2, 2014, 10:28 AM
Apple, Samsung Head to Court in Second U.S. Mobile Patent Trial, Google to Speak Up
March 31, 2014, 3:44 PM
Apple Authorized to Seek $40 Per Device Against Samsung
March 13, 2014, 4:31 PM
Tim Cook Doesn't Care if Android is Beating iOS in Sales
May 29, 2013, 12:30 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information