Apple is Relying on Blog Posts to Squeeze $2B+ USD From Samsung
April 10, 2014 5:33 PM
comment(s) - last by
Heavily redacted blog posts they are, at that
Apple, Inc.'s (
) high priced legal team liked
by blog TmoNews enough that they're using it as "evidence" in court. The post describes how Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) dropped Universal Search from
the Galaxy S3
, only to later add it back with a software update.
The author of the post -- David Beren -- expresses enthusiasm for Universal Search's return, which Apple is citing as key evidence that Android users saw the feature as a selling point.
seeking $2.191B USD
accused infringements on five of its patents
U.S. Patent No. 6,847,959
(filed: Jan. 2000, granted: Jan. 2005) -- the patent it says Android's Universal Search infringes upon.
Apple can't handle what the public
-- or at least some supporters of Google Inc.'s (
) Android operating system -- think of it.
, Apple has heavily redacted the comments, removing such gems as:
Who cares, we've had content searches on OS since way before the iPhone did it. Hate this lawsuit garbage.
The people that were deprived of such privileges due to crapple's non-sense
ismell another stupid lawsuit by crapple
Apple's lawyers claim they just don't want jurors to be "confused." So to avoid confusion they will black out at least half of what a person wrote so that their comment can be taken entirely out of context. The lawyers write:
[The exhibit] should be redacted to remove irrelevant, inaccurate, and prejudicial reader 'Comments' that were appended to the online article, including irrelevant and inaccurate references to this litigation and the 1846 case.
Any conceivable probative value of reader Comments speculating about and disparaging this case (and there is none) would be substantially outweighed by the high risk of confusing, misleading, and tainting the jury.
The Samsung Galaxy S3
Samsung naturally isn't happy with the redactions, but it has to tread lightly as it performed redactions of its own to remove certain unfavorable commentary about its 2012 lawsuit loss to Apple.
Apple is afraid that buyers prefer larger Androids to its smaller devices.
[Image Source: Getty Images]
Apple used a survey of users to estimate the value of the five patents in the case. It considers its
the least valuable, and the universal search patent the second least valuable.
At this point the case is viewed largely as an effort by Apple to squeeze some sort of large per-device licensing fees from Samsung. Recently published documents in the case reveal Apple is
upset about its slowing growth
considering adopting a "me-too" approach to Samsung
, move to larger screen sizes and devices priced at under $300 USD unlocked -- the key segments its says are growing globally.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
New Judge Please
4/11/2014 6:58:57 AM
Judge Lucy Koh has already displayed gross incompetence on previous lawsuits between these two. Why is she presiding again?
RE: New Judge Please
4/11/2014 12:55:54 PM
Probably because Apple has enough money to make it happen.
"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation
Apple: Consumers Want What We Don't Have (Cheaper Smartphones, Larger Screens)
April 8, 2014, 8:03 AM
Samsung Says Its Ads Mocking Apple Fanboys Drove Apple's Phil Schiller "Crazy"
April 2, 2014, 10:28 AM
Apple, Samsung Head to Court in Second U.S. Mobile Patent Trial, Google to Speak Up
March 31, 2014, 3:44 PM
Apple Authorized to Seek $40 Per Device Against Samsung
March 13, 2014, 4:31 PM
Tim Cook Doesn't Care if Android is Beating iOS in Sales
May 29, 2013, 12:30 PM
Quick Note: Google Chromebooks Now Coming with 1TB of Google Drive Space
November 21, 2014, 1:20 PM
Xiaomi Aims to be #1 Smartphone OEM Within 10 Years, Apple Urges Caution
November 21, 2014, 9:33 AM
Quick Note: Samsung's Request to Dismiss Microsoft Lawsuit is Rejected
November 20, 2014, 12:53 PM
Amazon Offers "The Washington Post" Free for Six Months to Kindle Fire Owners
November 20, 2014, 7:41 AM
Apple Watch Screen Resolution, App Limitations are Laid Bare by Developer Kit
November 19, 2014, 11:31 PM
Apple Replaces “FREE” Label with “GET” on App Downloads in iTunes App Store
November 19, 2014, 5:38 PM
Most Popular Articles
Wal-Mart: Miss Thanksgiving, Get Xbox One + Master Chief Collection for $299
November 17, 2014, 9:40 PM
Sweden Mulls Labelling "Sexist" Video Games in the Wake of Gamergate
November 17, 2014, 2:00 PM
Nokia Lumia 635 LTE Windows Phone is Only $40 at Best Buy on Black Friday
November 18, 2014, 11:59 AM
It's Official: Twitter is Profitable "Junk"
November 16, 2014, 10:45 PM
Apple Releases OS X 10.10.1 Yosemite, iOS 8.1.1 Updates
November 17, 2014, 1:43 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information