Print 20 comment(s) - last by inperfectdarkn.. on Apr 9 at 3:25 PM

Laser weapon will be the first to be deployed on a ship

The U.S. Navy has announced that it will deploy a prototype laser weapon aboard a Navy ship later this summer. The announcement is confirmation of the Navy's plans that were announced almost exactly a year ago today. In April of 2013, the Navy promised that it would be ready for shipboard testing of laser weapons by this summer.
The prototype laser that will be deployed is an improved version of the Laser Weapon System known as LaWS. The laser will be installed on the USS Ponce for at-sea testing in the Persian Gulf.
“This is a revolutionary capability,” said Chief of Naval Research Rear Adm. Matthew Klunder. “It’s absolutely critical that we get this out to sea with our sailors for these trials, because this very affordable technology is going to change the way we fight and save lives.”

A 2012 test of LaWS against a UAV 

Navy officials say that the laser weapon is a top priority to counter asymmetric threats like unmanned and light aircraft as well as small attack boats. The major benefits of laser weapons include that they have an “unlimited” magazine and attacks at the speed of light.
“Our nation’s adversaries are pursuing a variety of ways to try and restrict our freedom to operate,” Klunder said. “Spending about $1 per shot of a directed-energy source that never runs out gives us an alternative to firing costly munitions at inexpensive threats.”
Sailors control the laser system using a game-like controller to target a range of threats and control whether the treat is disabled or destroyed. The Navy currently has three prototypes and will determine which of the three is most suitable to move forward next year.

Source: ONR

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: the goal
By smyrgl on 4/8/2014 3:06:36 PM , Rating: 2
With respect you are incorrect and I'd be glad to explain why. Let me give a little background first.

The system the Navy uses for missile defense (AEGIS) is an integrated defense system which coordinates between the various fleet radars and provides threat tracking and fire control. All of the weapons we are discussing play a role in this system including Standard Missile (SM-2, SM-3), CIWS, ESSM, etc. It also coordinates track and targeting with the CAP fighters as well as the carrier E-2. Altogether it forms many concentric rings of defense for the fleet.

Now here are some problems with your conclusions:

1) Standard can engage targets at up to 200nm away (that's an upper limit of sorts but it should give you an idea of the engagement envelope) and does not need preparation prior to launch. That's why it is in a sealed VLS cell.

2) The current laser weapons the navy has been playing with are in the 20kW range and are solid state. 20kW is simply not all that powerful--THEL was a megawatt class weapon that was designed to be used for missile defense and that would be around what you'd want for such a weapon. 20kW simply isn't going to be effective against a heavy anti-ship missile like a P-700.

3) One of the reasons Standard is such a fantastic weapon is that it is offensive as well as defensive and can have targeting adjusted on the fly. That means that if a missile swarm is detected you can launch a return volley and then adjust some of the outbound missiles to attack the launchers once the inbounds are down.

4) The range of this laser system classifies it as part of the point defense circles of engagement and if missiles make it that far you are already in trouble.

5) Yes Standard and ESSM are very expensive. But the costs per shot aren't really all that relevant because we don't actually fire these things off regularly. Do you know how many missile swarms the US Navy has had to deal with in the last 50 years?

6) Lasers are RIDICULOUSLY weather dependent. They are simply not reliable enough to be useful for primary missile defense at this time.

Add all this up and you will see that a 20kW laser would be wonderful to have for close in low intensity threats (again see USS Cole) but is not for what you think it is for.

RE: the goal
By NellyFromMA on 4/9/2014 1:25:46 PM , Rating: 2
Good points. But, wouldn't you agree that from an engineering stand-point, there are plenty of questions about getting megawatt-class weapons shipboard that can be answered by moving the article-cited weapon shipboard that will be conducive towards more effective version down the road?

There are obviously unique challenges to each, but there are a whole litany of common challenges as well.

"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki