backtop


Print 67 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Apr 5 at 11:10 AM

The FCC won't allow net neutrality to regulate the way companies like Netflix connect to the Internet

Netflix was hoping for an end to internet tolls by calling to expand the scope of net neutrality, but the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) isn't having any of it. 
 
According to National Journal, the FCC denied Netflix's call to expand net neutrality so that it covered companies and their methods of connecting to the internet. 
 
More specifically, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings wanted the FCC to regulate the way companies like Netflix connect to the internet so that they wouldn't have to pay tolls to other companies (like Comcast, for example) to make sure its video gets to customers quickly and without any issues. 
 
"Peering and interconnection are not under consideration in the Open Internet proceeding, but we are monitoring the issues involved to see if any action is needed in any other context," said an FCC spokesperson.
 
Netflix agreed last month to pay Comcast to ensure that its movies and TV shows stream easily without traffic jams on Comcast's broadband network. While it's not clear how much Netflix is paying Comcast, the new deal will span several years and Comcast said it would connect to Netflix's servers at data centers operated by other companies. 
 
But Netflix wanted this to be a one-time deal until it managed to push laws in place that eliminated these tolls. 


Having to pay Comcast means Netflix could end up having to pay tolls to other providers like Verizon and AT&T -- and there's no way these tolls come cheap. The streaming company already pays high prices for content licensing from content providers, and having this extra fee on the table (and potentially from many big cable companies) would really put a damper on Netflix's cash flow. 

"Some big [Internet service providers] are extracting a toll because they can—they effectively control access to millions of consumers and are willing to sacrifice the interests of their own customers to press Netflix and others to pay," said Hastings. 
 
"If this kind of leverage is effective against Netflix, which is pretty large, imagine the plight of smaller services today and in the future."

Big cable got even bigger this year when Comcast acquired Time Warner Cable (TWC) in February for $45.2 billion USD. Comcast has about 25 percent share of the broadband market while TWC controls around 12 percent. As far as the subscription cable TV market goes, Comcast currently controls roughly 19 percent and TWC controls around 9 percent. Together, the pair would control about a third of the markets (37 percent of broadband; 28 percent of cable TV). 

Source: National Journal



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: ISP
By marvdmartian on 4/2/2014 7:35:09 AM , Rating: 4
Best line I've heard about the stimulus??

"My dog has created more shovel-ready jobs than the stimulus ever did!" ;)


RE: ISP
By gamerk2 on 4/2/2014 8:10:43 AM , Rating: 2
To be fair, the US tried to plug a loss of 3.5 Trillion in consumer spending with about 500 Billion in stimulus.

Its actually shocking the stimulus worked as good as it did, all things considered. Just look at the monthly job numbers over the 2009-2010 period:

January 2009: ~780k jobs lost
January 2010: ~100k jobs gained

The stimulus worked, but was not large enough to create any amount of long term growth. It stopped the bleeding, nothing more. The slow economic growth we have now is due to the middle class gradually ramping up spending, which as you can see is taking YEARS to have any real effect.

Hence my long standing argument that the cost of a second $500 Billion stimulus package would have been a LOT cheaper then the loss of tax revenue associated with a farther four years of stagnant economic growth.


RE: ISP
By NellyFromMA on 4/2/2014 9:00:09 AM , Rating: 3
It's WAY to early to say the Stimulus "Worked".

There's a real reason why John McCain stumped around calling it generational theft.

The after effects of the stimulus spending will not be determined by anyone right now. It will take 1 or 2 more generations to really pay that bill.

It achieved (sort of) its short term goal. The long term effects, well, they aren't looking to good when you look at the global picture... but, that remains to be seen.


RE: ISP
By sorry dog on 4/3/2014 11:17:35 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
To be fair, the US tried to plug a loss of 3.5 Trillion in consumer spending with about 500 Billion in stimulus.


The problem is that much of that consumer spending was done with borrowed money. Then people starting having to make payments on that borrowed money...and when some of them didn't make the payments, the credit merry go round broke down.

Can put Peter and Paul on different payment plan... but sooner or later Paul wants to be paid. Problem is the government went ahead and paid Paul off with a bunch of Uncle Sam IOU's and Peter's kids are going to get bill later on.


“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki