Print 67 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Apr 5 at 11:10 AM

The FCC won't allow net neutrality to regulate the way companies like Netflix connect to the Internet

Netflix was hoping for an end to internet tolls by calling to expand the scope of net neutrality, but the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) isn't having any of it. 
According to National Journal, the FCC denied Netflix's call to expand net neutrality so that it covered companies and their methods of connecting to the internet. 
More specifically, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings wanted the FCC to regulate the way companies like Netflix connect to the internet so that they wouldn't have to pay tolls to other companies (like Comcast, for example) to make sure its video gets to customers quickly and without any issues. 
"Peering and interconnection are not under consideration in the Open Internet proceeding, but we are monitoring the issues involved to see if any action is needed in any other context," said an FCC spokesperson.
Netflix agreed last month to pay Comcast to ensure that its movies and TV shows stream easily without traffic jams on Comcast's broadband network. While it's not clear how much Netflix is paying Comcast, the new deal will span several years and Comcast said it would connect to Netflix's servers at data centers operated by other companies. 
But Netflix wanted this to be a one-time deal until it managed to push laws in place that eliminated these tolls. 

Having to pay Comcast means Netflix could end up having to pay tolls to other providers like Verizon and AT&T -- and there's no way these tolls come cheap. The streaming company already pays high prices for content licensing from content providers, and having this extra fee on the table (and potentially from many big cable companies) would really put a damper on Netflix's cash flow. 

"Some big [Internet service providers] are extracting a toll because they can—they effectively control access to millions of consumers and are willing to sacrifice the interests of their own customers to press Netflix and others to pay," said Hastings. 
"If this kind of leverage is effective against Netflix, which is pretty large, imagine the plight of smaller services today and in the future."

Big cable got even bigger this year when Comcast acquired Time Warner Cable (TWC) in February for $45.2 billion USD. Comcast has about 25 percent share of the broadband market while TWC controls around 12 percent. As far as the subscription cable TV market goes, Comcast currently controls roughly 19 percent and TWC controls around 9 percent. Together, the pair would control about a third of the markets (37 percent of broadband; 28 percent of cable TV). 

Source: National Journal

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Corporate Greed
By Ranari on 4/1/2014 4:56:58 PM , Rating: 2
I don't get it. Customers are already paying ISP's for their bandwidth. What they use for it is their own business, and I don't feel ISP's have any right to regulate that. So really, who cares if Netflix is a good portion of the internet traffic. That's bought traffic when you pay your $79.99/month (or however much you pay) internet bill every month.

Comcast has no right to limit Netflix traffic.

RE: Corporate Greed
By Milliamp on 4/2/2014 3:03:55 AM , Rating: 2
Why do they have any right to charge you or limit your traffic? Is your traffic not limited to the connection you have?

What if you called up comcast, refused to give them another dime, and told them you would file a net neutrality complaint if they don't donate to you an unlimited amount of connectivity?

The only difference is your name isn't Netflix. If you had to draft a law that made charging Netflix any amount greater than free illegal, what would it say? Should Netflix get their own law or should the law apply to other companies as well? What is the criteria for having your connectivity provided for free by law?

Keep in mind, we both agree that overcharging is anticompetitive and should be illegal.

RE: Corporate Greed
By snyper256 on 4/3/2014 12:37:16 AM , Rating: 2
It's just anti-competitive behavior by the cable corporations.

"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki