Print 67 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Apr 5 at 11:10 AM

The FCC won't allow net neutrality to regulate the way companies like Netflix connect to the Internet

Netflix was hoping for an end to internet tolls by calling to expand the scope of net neutrality, but the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) isn't having any of it. 
According to National Journal, the FCC denied Netflix's call to expand net neutrality so that it covered companies and their methods of connecting to the internet. 
More specifically, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings wanted the FCC to regulate the way companies like Netflix connect to the internet so that they wouldn't have to pay tolls to other companies (like Comcast, for example) to make sure its video gets to customers quickly and without any issues. 
"Peering and interconnection are not under consideration in the Open Internet proceeding, but we are monitoring the issues involved to see if any action is needed in any other context," said an FCC spokesperson.
Netflix agreed last month to pay Comcast to ensure that its movies and TV shows stream easily without traffic jams on Comcast's broadband network. While it's not clear how much Netflix is paying Comcast, the new deal will span several years and Comcast said it would connect to Netflix's servers at data centers operated by other companies. 
But Netflix wanted this to be a one-time deal until it managed to push laws in place that eliminated these tolls. 

Having to pay Comcast means Netflix could end up having to pay tolls to other providers like Verizon and AT&T -- and there's no way these tolls come cheap. The streaming company already pays high prices for content licensing from content providers, and having this extra fee on the table (and potentially from many big cable companies) would really put a damper on Netflix's cash flow. 

"Some big [Internet service providers] are extracting a toll because they can—they effectively control access to millions of consumers and are willing to sacrifice the interests of their own customers to press Netflix and others to pay," said Hastings. 
"If this kind of leverage is effective against Netflix, which is pretty large, imagine the plight of smaller services today and in the future."

Big cable got even bigger this year when Comcast acquired Time Warner Cable (TWC) in February for $45.2 billion USD. Comcast has about 25 percent share of the broadband market while TWC controls around 12 percent. As far as the subscription cable TV market goes, Comcast currently controls roughly 19 percent and TWC controls around 9 percent. Together, the pair would control about a third of the markets (37 percent of broadband; 28 percent of cable TV). 

Source: National Journal

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: So then what will net neutrality protect?
By drlumen on 4/1/2014 4:53:44 PM , Rating: 2
If there is a disparity between ISP's for peering or carriage agreements then the ISP's should sort it out. I'm sure Netflix pays a ton for their bandwidth through their ISP. Why does their ISP not pass that on to the others downstream? If, after all the downstream peers are agreed and paid then the Netflix ISP should go to them with possible rate increases. In essence, the Netflix ISP would serve as their customer (Netflix) advocate. If the current Netflix ISP can't arrange proper peering or carriage then Netflix goes to another ISP.

What's to keep TWC, Comcast, AT&T or Verizon from setting fees so high that Netflix can't afford them? The Netflix traffic suffers and, once again, guess who is ready to step in with their own VOD or pay channel offerings?

It's ridiculous that the FCC is turning a blind eye to this.

RE: So then what will net neutrality protect?
By karimtemple on 4/1/2014 5:25:08 PM , Rating: 2
What you're not getting is that there's nothing wrong with the peering. That's all going as previously agreed. The problem is that peering, as it is, isn't enough for millions of customers simultaneously doing high-definition video streams pretty much all the time. By all accounts, in terms of traffic, Netflix and YouTube are most of the Internet. Video is a lot of data. Video streaming is a lot of throughput.

By drlumen on 4/2/2014 12:15:48 PM , Rating: 2
Peering is the problem. ISP's such as TWC or Comcast (et al ISP's) aren't wanting to provide the bandwidth to XO Communications (Netflix ISP) because most all of the traffic is one way - downstream. The et al don't believe the peering is fair as there is not as much traffic carried upstream by XO. Therefore the et al aren't willing to provide the extra bandwidth due to the disparity in upstream/downstream traffic.

This is where the ISP's need to sort it out. Should Netflix be required to cut a deal with every little ISP known to man just to serve their customers? Or, should the ISP's sort it out so that Netflix (or any other company) should only be billed by their primary ISP?

"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki