Print 67 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Apr 5 at 11:10 AM

The FCC won't allow net neutrality to regulate the way companies like Netflix connect to the Internet

Netflix was hoping for an end to internet tolls by calling to expand the scope of net neutrality, but the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) isn't having any of it. 
According to National Journal, the FCC denied Netflix's call to expand net neutrality so that it covered companies and their methods of connecting to the internet. 
More specifically, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings wanted the FCC to regulate the way companies like Netflix connect to the internet so that they wouldn't have to pay tolls to other companies (like Comcast, for example) to make sure its video gets to customers quickly and without any issues. 
"Peering and interconnection are not under consideration in the Open Internet proceeding, but we are monitoring the issues involved to see if any action is needed in any other context," said an FCC spokesperson.
Netflix agreed last month to pay Comcast to ensure that its movies and TV shows stream easily without traffic jams on Comcast's broadband network. While it's not clear how much Netflix is paying Comcast, the new deal will span several years and Comcast said it would connect to Netflix's servers at data centers operated by other companies. 
But Netflix wanted this to be a one-time deal until it managed to push laws in place that eliminated these tolls. 

Having to pay Comcast means Netflix could end up having to pay tolls to other providers like Verizon and AT&T -- and there's no way these tolls come cheap. The streaming company already pays high prices for content licensing from content providers, and having this extra fee on the table (and potentially from many big cable companies) would really put a damper on Netflix's cash flow. 

"Some big [Internet service providers] are extracting a toll because they can—they effectively control access to millions of consumers and are willing to sacrifice the interests of their own customers to press Netflix and others to pay," said Hastings. 
"If this kind of leverage is effective against Netflix, which is pretty large, imagine the plight of smaller services today and in the future."

Big cable got even bigger this year when Comcast acquired Time Warner Cable (TWC) in February for $45.2 billion USD. Comcast has about 25 percent share of the broadband market while TWC controls around 12 percent. As far as the subscription cable TV market goes, Comcast currently controls roughly 19 percent and TWC controls around 9 percent. Together, the pair would control about a third of the markets (37 percent of broadband; 28 percent of cable TV). 

Source: National Journal

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: So then what will net neutrality protect?
By Reclaimer77 on 4/1/2014 4:01:40 PM , Rating: 1
You're confused because Tiffany is framing this situation in a horribly incorrect context.

Netflix wasn't forced to pay Comcast to deliver content to the end users. There is NO "toll"! Netflix sought Comcast out and they agreed on terms that would BETTER serve Netflix customers due to the massive amount of traffic Netflix imposes on Internet Service Providers.

These aren't "tolls". ISP's are NOT blocking Netflix traffic unless Netflix pays up. But obviously Netflix represents a GIGANTIC amount of bandwidth usage, and I don't think it's unfair that ISP's and Netflix work out mutually beneficial arrangements.

Tiffany is the worst, the wording in this article is just criminal.

RE: So then what will net neutrality protect?
By ritualm on 4/1/2014 8:47:22 PM , Rating: 3
Netflix was corralled into this awful agreement because Comcast gave its own Xfinity service a higher traffic priority than its competitor.

On purpose.

By McGaiden on 4/1/2014 10:56:21 PM , Rating: 2
Why do you insist on using facts and logic on the internet, ritualm?

Don't you want to amuse people who protect mega corporations like Reclaimer77 so they can get raped later on and proudly say "I defended that".

Net neutrality is very important, and comcast is, as you say, only trying to crush Netflix by pushing these tolls. Netflix came to Comcast first because they knew that if the FCC was not willing to stand up for net neutrality, it had no choice.

And the FCC is again demonstrating that the US gubmint is more attunted to corporate lobbyists than it is for the American taxpayer.

But unlike most retarded conservatives, who draw the conclusion that we now need MORE corporate control, we should examine how the U.S. government came to this.

And the answer is money. Buckloads of money. All of it coming from corporate lobbyists.

America is turning into a banana republic. Even notoriously corrupt Mexico is shaking up its telecom industry, while America is moving into the other direction, towards more oligarchy and control of the few.

Aside from Silicon Valley, there is very little to admire about America anymore. And the majority of the workers in Silicon Valley are immigrants anyway.

RE: So then what will net neutrality protect?
By Milliamp on 4/2/2014 3:17:30 AM , Rating: 2
That's actually not what's happening. Netflix is asking to have their connections to the Internet donated by ISPs rather than have to pay them anything. Netflix is asking for a free lunch.

Netflix is'd claiming to be overcharged, they are protesting against being charged at all. As AT&T put it they want a free lunch.

Rate limiting their packets should be against the law but simply charging them normal rates for connectivity? Making a law against that would be dumb.

By Etsp on 4/3/2014 1:46:33 PM , Rating: 2
They have a connection to the internet: XO Communications. That is their ISP. They pay for that. They pay to get access to the internet.

The problems stem from when Netflix's traffic leaves XO's network into the rest of the internet. Comcast deliberately did not upgrade that link as needed as a means of reducing the quality of Netflix for their customers, and used it as a tool to force Netflix to pay to be connected directly to Comcast.

It's like Verizon saying you need to pay them to get good call quality to their customers, when you have service with AT&T.

“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki