Directory of "Illegal Websites" Aims to Cut Off Pirates' Ad Revenue
March 31, 2014 12:38 PM
comment(s) - last by
New effort looks to directly take away a top source of pirate booty
Top piracy websites like
The Pirate Bay
are often surprisingly savvy at monetizing their own product of sorts (stealing the products of others). That money has helped the sites secure competent legal representation,
good server support
, and find other ways to stifle enforcement efforts from content owners.
I. New Strategy to Fight Pirates -- Block Their Ads
Anti-piracy groups have focused much of their efforts on either
targeting customers who pirate with threat schemes
, or by looking to
force or cajole internet service providers into trying to filter/block popular piracy sites
. The former approach was largely a failure
due to the costs
the public backlash
. The latter approach proved largely ineffectual as well, given clever use of technologies such as proxy networks.
City of London Police
has come up with a clever new scheme to bleed the pirates dry. They call their creation "The Infringing Website List" (IWL), a directory that it described as an "up-to-date list of copyright infringing sites". They're dubbing the IWL effort "Project Creative".
The enforcement agency's goal is to provide the list to third-party advertisers like Google Inc. (
), Microsoft Corp. (
), and Apple, Inc. (
), pressuring them to ban the listed sites from advertising eligibility.
The project is currently tied intimately to London law enforcement, but if successful pcould be adopted by other groups and jurisidictions.
The City of London's
Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit
(PIPCU) is enthusiastic about the project. Detective Chief Inspector Andy Fyfe comments
in a press release
If an advert from an established brand appears on an infringing website not only does it lend the site a look of legitimacy, but inadvertently the brand and advertiser are funding online crime. Therefore the IWL also serves as a safety tool, ensuring the reputation of advertisers and brands are not discredited through association with illegal websites
The police claim they will avoid the mistakes of past enforcement efforts by the RIAA and others by properly notifying sites if they make the list, to allow for appeal. Overzealous efforts have played a key role in scuttling past efforts, such as the backlash generated when the RIAA
sued a deceased elderly grandmother
back in 2005.
The IWL was tested in a pilot last year. It brought relatively few complaints, but only resulted in a 12 percent reduction in branded product ads on targeted websites. The question now becomes whether the police and private sector partners can convince more tech companies to refuse to advertise to priates.
But a bigger question, perhaps, is whether the police can prevent the effort from devolving into the
desparate, heavy-handed efforts
of days past (and present).
II. Piracy is Big Money Business, but Police Aren't Doing Themselves Favors With Secrecy
No one is questioning that some small artists have suffered from rampant digital piracy. While figures of piracy are often overestimated, exagerrated, or misunderstood, it's hard to believe that no artist big or small has lost revenue to pirates.
A UK affiliate of the
Recording Industry Association of America
(RIAA) -- the
Digital Citizens Alliance
(DCA) -- in
a recent study
suggested that piracy sites such pull in $227M USD in piracy revenue per year. In Q3 alone, large torrent sites (the highest earners) pulled in an estimated $23M USD. That survey claims that the top 30 bittorrent sites earn an average of $4.4M USD annually, while the top few (e.g.
The Pirate Bay
) can early $6M USD or more per year.
the London police
and DCA's promises of fairness seem questionable, given that they aren't even making their list public. A spokesperson admitted to TorrentFreak:
All sites on IWL are identified and evidenced as infringing by rights holders and then verified by PIPCU.
We are not making the IWL public.
The List will be ever changing as new sites appear and older sites comply.
That begs the question -- if this is supposed to be a public "hall of shame" to admonish pirates and is supposed to be an honest, lawful, transparent boycott effort against brazen theft, why make the decision of keeping the list secret?
London Police aren't exactly known for their friendliness to the public. [Image Source: China Daily]
Public support has always played a key role in fighting crime, as illustrated by the success of the "most wanted" list in the U.S. If law enforcement turns its back on public sentiment by refusing to share information on enforcement efforts on them, it raises fears of corruption and/or incompetence.
suggest, the lack of transparency is troubling as it raises the risk of innocent websites being misclassified and suffering financial damages. To that end the piracy lobby may once again fall victim to its
City of London Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
3/31/2014 5:00:58 PM
Depends on what piracy you're talking about.
Let us not forget the official name for piracy: Copyright Infringement, and it's a very big problem indeed. But it has to be seperated into 2 distinct catagories:
1. Consumer Infringement, or what most of us think of when we hear "Piracy". This is an almost harmless crime and often even benificial when traditional marketing channels are stuffed to the brim already. The problem here is the people you'll hear screaming bloody murder are often the people who benifit from piracy the most, or atleast lose the least. There are some smaller artists who are actually hurt by it, but often enough the name recognition they recieve for when they release a second product more then makes up for it.
2. Business Piracy, or, other business infringing on copyright wholesale. For example the indiegame Luftrausers that came out not too long ago was instantly copied then sold by chinese firms. That takes away a whole chunk of revenue. Or in a recent Q&A of a youtuber called Totalbiscuit where the guy gave an example of some russian fellow uploading his video to his own channel, which ended up getting more views then the original. That's alot of lost ad revenue, more then any end user with adblock could ever cause. He copyright claimed it on youtube, the russian guy counterclaimed it and actually won even though he couldn't speak any english. But any one youtuber isn't big enough to actually get a large company such as google to change their ways.
The latter is a big problem. It's also the one you'll least hear about and hardly anything can or is done about, as the people it happens to either aren't big enough to throw their weight around or cannot afford the lawyers needed to act as a deterrent.
I'll happily support increased penalties of copyright infringement of the latter cases. In the youtube example i'd even support youtube being liable for said lost revenue in order to get them to change things for the better. It has a tangible effect on people that are often enough struggeling as it is. But consumer piracy, i just cannot feel bad about.
"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer
The Pirate Bay Abandons Sweden, Sets up New Strongholds in Norway, Spain
February 26, 2013, 2:05 PM
Anti-Piracy "Mafia" in Finland Raid House, Confiscate Winnie the Pooh Laptop
November 23, 2012, 9:16 AM
Anonymous Knocks Down Virgin Media's Site Over Pirate Bay Takedown
May 9, 2012, 11:45 AM
The RIAA's Dream Turns to Nightmare -- Inside The Pirate Bay's Torrent Purge
February 14, 2012, 12:47 PM
Britain Blames Social Media For Class Riots, Looks to Censorship
August 12, 2011, 9:25 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information