backtop


Print 43 comment(s) - last by natehow.. on Apr 1 at 1:21 PM

Tesla can continue selling its EVs directly

In a big win for Tesla Motors' auto dealership battle, the state of Ohio will allow the automaker to sell its electric vehicles directly to customers. According to AP, Tesla Motors and the Ohio Automobile Dealers Association negotiated the deal Tuesday, and it was approved by a Senate panel. 

This means that Tesla can continue selling its $69,900+ Model S sedan EV directly to customers in both of its existing Ohio stores -- which are in Columbus and Cincinnati.

Even better news for Tesla is that it can open a third store Cleveland as well, but it won't be allowed to open any more than that. 

The bill also made sure to prohibit other automakers from opening manufacturer-owned stores in the state of Ohio. This ensures that others can't follow Tesla's path and try to get rid of auto dealers altogether. 

Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that auto dealerships don't do a very good job at selling specialty cars like Tesla's high-end electric vehicles (Roadster, Model S). Hence, he's looking to run his own Tesla stores around the U.S. where he believes his cars will get a fair shot at being sold.  
 
The problem is that auto dealers don't want to sell Tesla vehicles, and they're also barring Tesla from selling its own vehicles (with the exception of online, where customers can physically touch or test drive the EVs).  


Elon Musk [SOURCE: Green Optimistic]

But auto dealers say that they are necessary middlemen between auto manufacturers and consumers. They've insisted that their role provides fair play for consumers when it comes to warranties and service issues. 

Tesla was granted authorization by Republican Gov. John Kasich through the Bureau of Motor Vehicles to sell its EVs directly to customers via an issued license. 

Earlier this month, it was reported that Ohio auto dealers were supporting a bill that would stop Tesla from opening stores outside of its only two locations in Ohio. 
 
It recently came to light that Ohio Sen. Tom Patton (R-Strongsville) backed the anti-Tesla bill -- called Senate Bill 260 -- which aims to prevent Tesla and any other automaker from "applying for a license to sell or lease new or used motor vehicles at retail." What's interesting is that Patton received at least $42,825 between 2002 and 2013 from state and national auto dealership owners, employees, and political action committees. 

But this recent agreement with Ohio auto dealers is a win for Tesla, especially when other states -- like New Jersey -- are giving Tesla the boot. 

Earlier this month, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s administration proposed a new rule, which requires a person to have a franchise agreement with an auto manufacturer in order to be granted a license to sell. 
 
A week later, the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission voted in favor of the ban of direct auto sales. Tesla already operates two stores in New Jersey, and had plans to open more before this new rule. These now need to become showrooms as of April 1.

On the other side of the country, states like Texas and Arizona are rethinking Tesla's direct sales model (which they currently ban as well) in order to secure Tesla's giant new Gigafactory for EV batteries. The factory aims to supply batteries for up to 500,000 EVs by the year 2020. The gigafactory would cost $5 billion USD, span as much as 1,000 acres, and employ about 6,500 people. It would also largely be powered by renewable energy, hence its need to be in a Southwestern state. 

Source: AP



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Dealers are clearly shaking in their boots
By Reclaimer77 on 3/27/2014 4:36:57 PM , Rating: -1
The dealership model is going nowhere I'm affraid. Notice how the major players have been completely silent on this? If GM, Toyota, Ford etc etc aren't fighting the NADA, if they are content with the status quo, I'm curious why you think there's some groundshaking change about to take place.

I mean, come on, stop being a homer for one minute and THINK man.


RE: Dealers are clearly shaking in their boots
By Mint on 3/27/2014 4:58:06 PM , Rating: 2
Did you even read my post?

They're striking a deal with Tesla precisely because they DON'T want a groundshaking change to take place. And Tesla will accept it because it gives them an edge.

If they thought maintaining the status quo was a 100% certainty no matter what, then why would they be giving Tesla an exception?


RE: Dealers are clearly shaking in their boots
By Reclaimer77 on 3/27/14, Rating: -1
RE: Dealers are clearly shaking in their boots
By Mint on 3/28/2014 8:48:26 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Tesla was already selling vehicles in the State. This isn't some huge event like you're making it out to be imo.

And if this deal didn't happen, they would have been told to stop, just like they were in Texas and NJ.

quote:
And please answer my question. The major auto makers can leverage SO much more power than Tesla. Why are they being so silent on this?
The major automakers depend on the existing dealer network to sell their cars. If any of them get into a big fight with their dealer network, that would be even worse than a UAW strike.

It'll take a long, long time and gobs of capital for manufacturers to set up their own showroom network to replace dealers.

They're content with the existing system for now, but they're going to push for direct sales also. BMW is already getting into a small fight with their dealers:
http://www.examiner.com/article/bmw-says-folks-can...
GM is pissed about this deal in Ohio:
http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/JNQfbsKt4zyr6_48C...

We're just getting started with major manufacturer involvement.


RE: Dealers are clearly shaking in their boots
By rountad on 3/28/2014 1:39:31 PM , Rating: 2
GM admits that NOT having a mandatory third party dealership is a distinct competitive advantage!


RE: Dealers are clearly shaking in their boots
By Mint on 3/28/2014 3:15:07 PM , Rating: 2
Precisely. All automakers want the freedom to sell direct, but they're not going to push for it until they're sure that there won't be any consequences from angry dealers.


By rountad on 3/28/2014 4:33:36 PM , Rating: 2
That's true, too, but my point was that it refutes the NADA point that they are acting in the best interests of the customer.

Musk's mafia comparison was apt...


“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki