Print 14 comment(s) - last by mxzrider2.. on Jan 25 at 3:35 AM

Although Yahoo and Microsoft both turned over search records to the federal government, Google looks to put up a fight

Google has not complied with a White House subpoena that was issued over the summer, which has led to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to ask a federal judge in San Jose for an order that would force Google to turn over search records.  The Associated Press has reported that the federal government has asked for two specific things:  The first thing requested is that Google turns over a sample of a million random web site addresses found in the Google search engine index.  The second request is for records of Google search queries over any week.  

The U.S. government apparently wants the information because it is challenging the rejection of the 1998 Child Online Protection Act, which is for "the protection of the physical and psychological well-being of minors by shielding them from materials that are harmful to them."  If the COPA became law, adults would have to register with sites that provide adult content, or use an access code.  Civil liberties groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) immediately challenged the law, claiming that it is unconstitutional because it is  restrictive of free speech.

Yahoo and Microsoft have acknowledged and complied with orders from the federal government to turn over search records.  Both companies also said that the requested data was provided without handing over any personal information of subscribers. 

Although many speculate that the federal government is using the data gathered for something other than the alleged intended purposes stated, it is hard for us to tell.  This will most likely be a story that we will continue to hear hear in the future.   

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

1st amendment foul
By jconan on 1/20/2006 10:52:37 PM , Rating: 3
it looks like US is attempting to follow china and korea in censorship. isn't this foul of the 1st amendment of the US Constitution:
quote:;/quote> or is it an authority of an unitary executive? i usually don't rant but i've been pondering over the term of unitary executive and i guess this act by the general da is part of it an enforcement of the executive branch of parts of the laws that it sees fit rather than the whole parts of the law or probably i'm mistaken. anyways i also ran across this thread awhile ago and the authors view seems to be true "Internet Censorship coming to the U.S. - Must read"

bush should appoint janet reno to office rather than samuel alito now that should balance and maybe that'll straighten the views of unitary executive

RE: 1st amendment foul
By Viditor on 1/21/2006 1:39:48 AM , Rating: 2
looks like US is attempting to follow china and korea in censorship

I think it's less like censorship, and more like developing a doctrine of spying on citizens. This seems more and more like Orwell's "1984" to me...
I tend to resent this strongly! IMHO, the Bush administration is using the "War on Terror" to repeal decades of civil rights. I can't imagine what will happen when/if Alito is confirmed to the Supreme Court...

RE: 1st amendment foul
By mxzrider2 on 1/25/2006 3:35:51 AM , Rating: 2
hell fuck laws like this and stuff, why would the goverment need to do any of that anyway.

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki