New Sheldon Adelson-Backed Anti-Online Gambling Bill Introduced
March 27, 2014 3:47 PM
comment(s) - last by
It restores the old interpretation of the U.S. Wire Act
The legalization of internet gambling is a debate that could soon take a turn as new legislation -- backed by Sheldon Adelson -- has been proposed.
, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) have introduced joint legislation that would ban all Internet gambling in the United States (except fantasy sports and horse racing).
This new bill is based on the old interpretation of the U.S. Wire Act, which made online gambling illegal. However, in 2011, a decision by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) legalized online gambling once again -- giving the Wire Act a new interpretation.
Sen. Graham believes the fact that a judge's decision was used to legalize online gambling instead of the legislative branch was unacceptable.
"If you want to have online gambling, then come to the Congress," said Sen. Graham. "Let’s have a debate."
Since the DOJ decision, U.S. states like Nevada, Delaware, and New Jersey have legalized online gambling.
Sheldon Adelson [SOURCE: ABC News]
The bill has a lot of support, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), who said that online gambling sites don't screen for underage gamblers and do nothing to prevent/take care of fraud, criminal acts or money laundering. The bill is also supported by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.)
But one of the main forces behind the bill is Sheldon Adelson, who owns the Las Vegas Sands Corp. and opposes online gaming because it could be harmful to children.
“The fact that Sheldon is on board is a good thing, but I'm doing this because this is ... what I feel like I should do," said Sen. Graham.
Those who support online gambling say that it should be legal, but regulated to prevent gambling addictions.
Former Reps. Mary Bono (R-Calif.) and Mike Oxley (R-Ohio), chairmen of the Coalition for Consumer and Online Protection, said the online gambling ban would reduce consumer protections because it would cause the black market to "thrive" and make people less safe online.
The bill is to be introduced this week.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: With all due respect...
3/31/2014 8:29:26 AM
I'd change it to:
We don't need your god damn permission for anything.
And the constitution should probably begin with that statement.
You can't hammer it in people's minds hard enough: A free society doesn't ask why something should be legal, it asks why something must be illegal.
"Think of the children!" is how you smell the wolf in sheep's clothing.
"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information