Print 33 comment(s) - last by robinthakur.. on Mar 28 at 7:30 AM

He tried to leave ahead of time despite his contract

Poaching is a common practice in the tech sector, where one company will recognize the talent of an employee at another and attempt to make that person a better offer. This recently happened when a tech executive tried leaving the withered and dying field of BlackBerry bushes in Waterloo, Ontario in favor of the healthy and prospering Apple orchard in Cupertino. But it's not clear if the poach attempt will ever be successful after a recent court ruling.

According to iMore, Apple tried to poach BlackBerry SVP of Software Sebastien Marineau-Mes, but Marineau-Mes' contract with BlackBerry got in the way. 

Marineau-Mes started talking about leaving Apple back in September 2013, and after formally being offered the position of Vice President of Core OS in December, Marineau-Mes accepted and signed a contract with Apple. 

He put in his resignation with BlackBerry on December 23 with a two-month notice, but there was one major problem: Marineau-Mes' contract said he had to give six-months notice if he were to resign.

Marineau-Mes signed the contract for a promotion to BlackBerry EVP of Platform Development on September 27, 2013 -- around the same time he was in talks with Apple. 

As a result, BlackBerry took Marineau-Mes to court over the matter.

Sebastien Marineau-Mes [SOURCE: Apple Insider]

The ruling was just handed down from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, which decided that Marineau-Mes must fulfill a full six-month resignation before he can leave BlackBerry -- meaning he wouldn't be able to go to Apple until June 2014. 

This likely hurts for Marineau-Mes, but probably more so for BlackBerry. The Canadian company had Marineau-Mes sign that September contract as a promotion during a time when the company was in a promotional freeze (meaning promotions were put on hold, unless it was for someone they really wanted to hold onto).

"BlackBerry will not stand by while a former employee violates his employment contract," said BlackBerry. "It is unfortunate that we had to take this step, but we will do whatever is necessary to ensure that employees honor the agreements they make with us. When we enter into an agreement with an employee, as we have with Mr. Marineau, we expect him to honor his commitment just as he would expect that we will honor ours. We are pleased that the court has endorsed our position and ruled that the employee contract and its terms are valid."

It's unclear if Apple will wait until June for Marineau-Mes.

Apple and BlackBerry aren't the only poachers in the tech realm. In December 2013, one of Microsoft's top executives in charge of graphics -- Blaise Agüera y Arcas -- left Microsoft for Google's machine learning group.

Source: iMore

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By GotThumbs on 3/26/2014 4:19:28 PM , Rating: 2

What's your word worth?

The man signed a binding contract. He needs to follow through on the agreement if his word counts for anything.

By sigmatau on 3/26/2014 6:28:19 PM , Rating: 2
Wrong! You cannot force someone to do anything in a contract. If he wants out, all he has to do is pay. Simple as that. There is a benefit on both sides when a contract is drawn up. This benefit is always in terms of monetary amounts even if it is not explicitly stated.

You cannot sue someone in court for what their word is worth so that question is meaningless. I simply look at this if it were to go before a judge. There is no judge, unless you are referring to a third world country, that can force someone to do something in a civil proceeding. They can make him pay, and that is all.

By retrospooty on 3/26/2014 7:02:05 PM , Rating: 3
Its a standard "no compete" clause. It would state that you cannot work for any direct competitor for x amount of time and there would be a stiff financial penalty that you would have to pay if you breach it. The penalties are typically far higher than any individual would be able to pay, or any wealthy individual would be willing to pay. The competing company wouldn't likely want to pay either, because it is basically stating that this guy wont honor the new company's "no compete" clause. So yes, you CAN do whatever you want, but these are written so basically no-one does. To break it is way worse than to wait. It would have to be a really specially talented guy that someone was willing to pay insane amounts of cash to procure. Not gonna happen.

By sigmatau on 3/26/2014 7:17:11 PM , Rating: 2
I don't believe the non compete clause will hold up in court. IBM sure didn't when they settled with one of their employees that went to Apple. Look up IBM v. Papermaster.

IBM's argument was that Papermaster would disclose trade secrets to Apple. They were trying to force him not to work in his field for a whole year before joining Apple. Basically, they thought it was right for him to be unemployed for a year before he joined another company in his field of work.

Not only did IBM settle with Papermaster, the court ordered that they pay him $3 million for his loss of potential employment opportunity. The court did order a trial as they did see IBM's potential to lose trade secrets, but it was IBM that settled with Papermaster as they apparently knew how weak their case was.

By retrospooty on 3/27/2014 10:37:40 AM , Rating: 2
It depends entirely on the contract signed and how airtight it is... Obviously IBM's wasnt... Papermaster worked at IBM from 1982–2008, so it was likely created and signed decades ago. It's a more standardized thing now.

"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber
Related Articles

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki