backtop


Print 107 comment(s) - last by Just Tom.. on Mar 31 at 8:20 PM

Support for Office 2003 ends April 8 along with Windows XP

Microsoft has stepped up its efforts in recent months to kill off Windows XP for good, and those efforts are now extending to Office 2003. Office 2003 has been around for over a decade and Microsoft wants users to switch to Office 365.
 
Microsoft wrote in a blog post, "Office 2003 no longer meets the needs of the way we work, play and live today. For this reason, it is time to say farewell to Office 2003 and embrace the productivity solution of today – Office 365."
 

Microsoft wants users to ditch Office 2003

Many people have been using Office 2003 for years simply because it does all they need and it's paid for. Office 365 requires a subscription and you will need to continue paying to keep it active.
 
Microsoft says that support for Office 2003 will end on April 8.
 
We already knew that support for Windows XP would also end on April 8, and Microsoft has resorted to pop ups to tell XP users the end is here. Microsoft also offers a $100 discount to get XP users to upgrade to Windows 8. 

Source: Office



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By Vytautas on 3/25/2014 11:26:04 AM , Rating: 3
:) :). You don´t get it, do you? Yes, you CAN do everything with later office versions that you can with office 2003. What you CAN´T do is do everything you need with more or less ONE CLICK. In other words later office versions DO TAKE more time to do the same amount of work. I have measured it and in my case office 2003 is 15-20% faster to use than later Microsoft office packs. I value my time too much to spend money on a product that makes me loose productivity.


RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By inighthawki on 3/25/2014 11:42:09 AM , Rating: 2
While a somewhat valid counterargument, if you're spending 2 weeks, 10 hours a day each, doing a particular task, you should really know the keyboard shortcuts to do everything at that point. Probably would have saved you 15-20% of your time regardless of which version of office you used.


RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By Vytautas on 3/25/2014 11:55:35 AM , Rating: 2
Again, your words clearly show you lack much experience in this field. When I speak about formatting tools I´m not talking about Ctrl+B, or Ctrl+I, or Ctrl+U, Ctrl+C and similar really common functions. I´m talking text boxes, columns, embedded tables, watermarks, comments, footnotes and similar functions.
Besides defending shitty interface design decisions with the fact that there are still keyboard shortcuts is the same as defending the decision of a car manufacturer replacing the wheels on one side of the car with square ones with the argument that you can still drive at the same speed while driving on the side with only the round wheels :). Or a wheelchair manufacturer that announces a wheelchair with square wheels, saying people can still go as fast with crutches.

The fu


RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By Vytautas on 3/25/2014 12:00:35 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry for the misstype at the end of my post.

The fact is that in 16 years of work as a translator I have learned the shortcuts that I find useful. For example when working with macros or translation plugins like wordfast or trados there are more useful shortcuts. But there are plenty of functions that are easier and faster to use with a graphic interface.


RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By inighthawki on 3/25/2014 12:13:09 PM , Rating: 2
You're right, I don't have your experience, so I don't even know specifically what you do. But by shortcuts I meant the fact that you can do any command on the ribbon with alt commands. And if you know the commands well enough, using those alt commands should still be faster than clicking a toolbar icons.

I was also not trying to defend the ribbon via a function of "still having keyboard shortcuts." That was actually a completely separate point from the ribbon altogether.


RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By Vytautas on 3/25/2014 12:37:44 PM , Rating: 2
It may be as you said, but you have to admit it´s still a very weak argument to be considered a point "in favor" of later office versions. There are a lot of shortcuts in office 2003, but even so I don´t use them ALL. It´s just not worth it. So saying the interface of later office versions doesn´t decrease productivity thanks to shortcuts can´t be considered a serious idea.


RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By 91TTZ on 3/25/2014 1:23:56 PM , Rating: 2
It sounds like you're saying that the Ribbon isn't a bad idea because it's still possible to work around it.

Sort of like how it's not a bad idea to place a boulder in the middle of the street because everyone should know how to drive around it.

The fact is that when the "old" way of doing things was more intuitive and faster for most people than the "new" way, they've taken a step backwards in the development of the product. It seems like the older versions of programs were all about functionality, but newer ones are all about style. At some point they began placing style before substance.


RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By Vytautas on 3/25/2014 1:38:51 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly. Would rate you up if I could :)


RE: Just A Matter Of Time
By inighthawki on 3/26/2014 6:54:31 PM , Rating: 2
No I feel that the ribbon is an improvement for the vast majority of their users, but for people like you who seem to have very specific performance needs, keyboard shortcuts are still available for everything you do to work just as quickly as before.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki