backtop


Print 37 comment(s) - last by ritualm.. on Apr 1 at 7:41 PM

This could happen as soon as 2022

NASA wants to analyze some terrain samples from Mars in an effort to answer whether life exists there, but the problem has been transporting such samples from the Red Planet back to Earth. 

But now, it looks as though NASA has found a potential solution: customize a SpaceX Dragon capsule

While this is just a proposal for now and is by no means a planned mission with set funding yet, NASA said that modifying a SpaceX Dragon capsule into a landing craft could be a cost-effective way of bringing Martian samples back to Earth as soon as 2022. 

An internal study at NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California revealed that the modified Dragon capsule -- dubbed "Red Dragon" -- would make a direct entry into the atmosphere of Mars and descend to the surface using retro propulsion for a precision touchdown (thanks to SuperDraco rocket engines) instead of a parachute system. 

The study suggests a Red Dragon could land roughly 2 metric tons of useful payload on Mars. A Red Dragon has "several times" the volume of the Viking heritage entry vehicle from the 1970s, and would be equipped to carry a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), an Earth Return Vehicle (ERV), and hardware to transfer samples collected.


[SOURCE: NASA]

From there, the Red Dragon return vehicle would exit the Martian surface, thanks to some help from the MAV, and make its way toward Earth. 

A big plus for Red Dragon is that the mission would not require the transfer of samples from one vehicle to another in Mars orbit.

"The significance of the work is that it opens the door to the efficient achievement of an important planetary science objective at a lower complexity level and, by extension, at potentially lower cost than previously considered," said Andrew Gonzales, leader of the NASA study.

This certainly isn't NASA and SpaceX's first project together. SpaceX -- which is headed by Tesla CEO Elon Musk -- flew its Dragon capsule and Falcon 9 rocket to the ISS for the first time back in May 2012 for a test supply run. After that successful trip, SpaceX and NASA signed a $1.6 billion contract that allows SpaceX to complete 12 supply trips to the ISS and back.

In October 2012, the Dragon capsule completed its first official cargo run to the ISS, bringing home 1,673 pounds of cargo. 

Source: Space.com



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: So this is what budget cuts get us?
By MrBlastman on 3/11/2014 4:04:51 PM , Rating: 2
I get what you are saying but I disagree. The chief reason the Fed's monetary expansion has not created enormous inflation yet is because it has primarily been targeted at Banks and Financial Institutions--who have not been passing on the benefits to the general population. They have received stacks of cash but we have seen very little of it.

Corporations, on the other hand, have been hoarding real, unleveraged money. I'd rather see them pour that money back into the system than a shift in Federal policy to dump cash straight into the system (not that the Fed can do this, as technically they can't at this point with rates as low as they are)--Congress and he President, could. It would be suicidal.

I'm not worried so much about inflation--I accept it as a very real possibility and am poised to capitalize tremendously off of it if and when it occurs. What I am worried about is allowing it to occur through leverage which is reckless.


RE: So this is what budget cuts get us?
By Just Tom on 3/11/2014 5:06:06 PM , Rating: 2
The money supply is a function of money's velocity and the quantity of money. That 'real, unleveraged money' is sitting in banks just like most of the QE funds. As soon as either pile of money starts getting spent inflation will increase, ceteris paribus. Of course, the Fed thinks they will be able to stay ahead of the inflationary curve by raising interest rates. I am doubtful.


By MrBlastman on 3/11/2014 8:54:11 PM , Rating: 2
They won't be able to at all given the amount of potential inflation out there. I'm preparing for sky-high interest rates. I can't wait to buy 30-year bonds at 10 - 15% again.

If it happens, that is. I think there is a decent case for it.


"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki