backtop


Print 36 comment(s) - last by blackseed.. on Mar 14 at 10:23 AM

Nudity is still allowed as long as it's artistic, educational or a documentary

Keep those sexy videos to yourself, because Twitter has made porn a no-no on Vine. 

According to the Vine blog, Twitter -- which owns the social video service Vine -- has changed its rules and terms of service this week, including a ban on sexually-explicit videos. 

The rules state that videos of sex acts (whether they're alone, with other people or with objects) are forbidden. That includes sexually explicit animations. 

However, nudity is still allowed as long as it's artistic, educational or a documentary. Even sexually suggestive content is welcome, but only if it's clothed. 
 
Twitter will rely on Vine users to report sexually explicit content rather than policing the site. Those who are flagged for sexual content can have their accounts suspended until the content is removed. 

But Twitter is already contacting Vine users with existing sexual content, which was posted before the rules changed. The company is seeking mass removal of any pornographic content, or users have the option to move their sexy videos to a new tool created by Twitter. This tool is only available to users to posted porn before the change in rules. 

Vine is a video-sharing service that allows Twitter and Vine users to share short video clips with one another. The minimum age for using Vine, according to Twitter, is 17 years old. 

Source: Vine



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Sigh...
By HostileEffect on 3/7/2014 2:17:06 PM , Rating: 5
We glorify violence, extreme gore, and brainless thrillers, but let someone show some tits and everyone loses their bricks...




RE: Sigh...
By deltaend on 3/7/14, Rating: 0
RE: Sigh...
By tayb on 3/7/2014 2:48:23 PM , Rating: 5
If your 12 year old daughter is on the internet she is exposed to "that kind of dren." Don't be naive.


RE: Sigh...
By freaqie on 3/9/2014 12:38:57 PM , Rating: 4
not only is she exposed, changes are it will be the first thing she sees! as you've failed to show her anything else.

We are so extremely "protective" especially when it comes to sex that getting to age 11-13 kids start to wonder how it looks for the other sex, and if they haven't been shown before that time they will start to dig themselves, either by asking their friends or the internet. it's just a healthy curiosity that is better satisfied beforehand

unfortunately the first thing they will find is probably hardcore porn. So what do we do "hide" the porn even more ?

No do the opposite, show children from a young age how things work in a normal controlled fashion, teach children about sex, about the dangers that it's normal,that you both have to agree, all that stuff before they start trying to find it out for themselves and make a real mess as they don't know what they're doing (and you can't blaim them for screwing up if you didn't explain it to them)

no; Nudity through movies, documenteries and biology lessons should be encouraged, it will satisfy the curiosity of the youth preventing them to find the craziest stuff first, and result in much more balanced relaxed posture to nudity and more safe and normal sex.


RE: Sigh...
By rs2 on 3/10/2014 8:27:38 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
changes are it will be the first thing she sees!


You mean the first thing she seeks out.

There may be a lot of porn on the Internet, but it doesn't find you. You find it. Unless you're in Soviet Russia.


RE: Sigh...
By Arsynic on 3/10/2014 12:02:25 PM , Rating: 2
What happened to being a parent?


RE: Sigh...
By Mint on 3/7/2014 2:45:54 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
but let someone show some tits

There's a lot more hardcore stuff than that growing like wildfire on Vine.

As an aside, do you have any problem with violence/gore in the media? It seems like we'd have a hard time finding any DT reader that thinks violent or gory video games create murderers or is otherwise harmful to society.

So why even make the comparison? You might as well have said, "We let kids drink water in public, but let someone show some tits..."


RE: Sigh...
By tayb on 3/7/2014 3:01:26 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
As an aside, do you have any problem with violence/gore in the media? It seems like we'd have a hard time finding any DT reader that thinks violent or gory video games create murderers or is otherwise harmful to society.


If we are worried about the psychological effects on children than neither of them should be weighted more than the other. If you don't think pornography is acceptable for children than you should feel the same about violence. The issue here is the double standard which results from a two thousand year old fiction book shaming sexual acts before marriage.


RE: Sigh...
By Spuke on 3/7/2014 3:05:33 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The issue here is the double standard which results from a two thousand year old fiction book shaming sexual acts before marriage.
BOOM!


RE: Sigh...
By Mint on 3/7/2014 3:22:54 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
If you don't think pornography is acceptable for children than you should feel the same about violence.

I don't see why that's necessarily the case. Why should one be equivalent to the other? Or worse than the other?

They're two different subjects. There's no reason why you should tell me how I feel about them.


RE: Sigh...
By rs2 on 3/10/2014 8:56:58 PM , Rating: 2
It's still a valid point. Sex, when done properly, is natural, healthy, legal, and mutually enjoyable. And major religions aside, there's no secular basis for arguing that sex is somehow inherently immoral.

Violence (and particularly violence of the excessive/over the top variety often depicted in fiction), on the other hand, is none of those things.

So if one truly believes that exposure to sex is somehow so extremely damaging to young adults that it must be suppressed from all publicly accessible media, it logically follows that one should be at least as concerned about exposure to violence.

And if a person is not, it's an indication that they are not approaching the issue in a rational and logical manner, and should simply be ignored for acting childish and/or being beholden to a faith-based viewpoint that has no basis in reality.


RE: Sigh...
By Schadenfroh on 3/7/2014 11:04:59 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The issue here is the double standard which results from a two thousand year old fiction book shaming sexual acts before marriage.

The Little Red Book of State-Atheism is a much newer book!

http://www.dailytech.com/China+Launches+Crackdown+...
quote:
Pornography is illegal in China, but the content proliferates into the country as more Chinese citizens begin to get Internet access. A woman last month was arrested after she reportedly posted an explicit video of herself on the internet.


RE: Sigh...
By chripuck on 3/10/2014 3:38:30 PM , Rating: 2
There's a difference between some form of loving sex being depicted between two individuals and some girl getting gang banged by 3 guys at the same time. Not only has there been no observable connections between violent video games and violence in young people (teens+) but there are vast amounts of literature that show pornography can have severely debilitating effects on a young mind. It gives young men an unhealthy and unrealistic expectation for sex and it gives young women an equally unrealistic standard to live up to.

And here's a clue, I don't need any ancient book to tell me this, I can read any number of recent medical studies to tell me this.


RE: Sigh...
By Solandri on 3/8/2014 4:10:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
As an aside, do you have any problem with violence/gore in the media? It seems like we'd have a hard time finding any DT reader that thinks violent or gory video games create murderers or is otherwise harmful to society.

Well, sexuality leads to reproduction, and I think a pretty good argument can be made that kids shouldn't be reproducing until they've reached a certain level of maturity and financial independence (the latter being why people marry in their 20s now instead of the teens like in Medieval times). They have to be capable of taking care of and making good decisions for the offspring. Sure you can abort, but that's kinda like saying it's ok to grind the gears in your car because you can always replace the clutch/transmission. Yeah you can, but it's easier and less of a hassle if you don't have to.

While gratuitous violence/gore in the media is a problem, I think a certain level of it should be required watching. I actually think we've gone too far the other way and far too many people are insulated from what the world is actually like. People happily eat hamburgers, but are upset when they see how cattle are butchered. People think you can just "talk" with bad guys to solve everything, and don't really comprehend the amount of suffering and destruction that can happen if they're allowed to run amok.

Of course as with sexuality, it makes sense to insulate kids from this until they're at a certain level of maturity. You have to develop a respect for wildlife and the balance of population ecosystems before you can understand the cost/benefit of butchering an animal for food. Teaching kids it's ok to kill without that context just results in those idiots who ride in the back of a pickup truck shooting at every animal they see. Likewise, if you teach kids about the things bad men do before they've developed the moral structure to understand why it's bad, they could misinterpret it as permission to do bad things themselves ("Hitler/Stalin did it, why can't I?").

In other words, it's not that one is good and the other is bad, or that both are good, or both are bad. It's that a certain level and certain timing for exposure to both is best, and opinion can differ based on which side of that "best" point you think the current state falls within. It's not a binary state as you seem to be implying - where someone thinks all portrayals of violence are ok while all portrayals of sexuality are not.


RE: Sigh...
By Reclaimer77 on 3/9/2014 4:51:43 AM , Rating: 1
What's with all this "violence and gore" in the media talk anyway? The media is more pussy now than ever before. Just compare today's bullshit Robocop PG-13 kiddie flick with the original. Verhoeven's masterpiece would have been NC-17 by today's standards, hard R.

Hell movies are barely rated R anymore. People don't know what violence and gore really is today. All the violence is implied and sterilized. It's not visceral anymore.

Some silly cop drama where a cop shoots a guy and you don't even see blood...that ain't violence or gore, kids. Violence on TV? Doesn't exist today really.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqsgjzz3-KI

THIS is violence and gore. Take your digital blood splatter Walt Disney crap and shove it.


RE: Sigh...
By atechfan on 3/10/2014 5:28:34 AM , Rating: 2
Try Vikings on History channel. Pretty bloody.


RE: Sigh...
By rs2 on 3/10/2014 9:22:24 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
sexuality leads to reproduction


Only if you do it wrong.

Source: 10+ years of sex, with not a single pregnancy.


RE: Sigh...
By Flunk on 3/7/2014 3:03:31 PM , Rating: 2
This sounds like a business opportunity to me!


RE: Sigh...
By Reclaimer77 on 3/7/14, Rating: -1
RE: Sigh...
By kickoff on 3/7/14, Rating: 0
RE: Sigh...
By atechfan on 3/7/2014 5:07:56 PM , Rating: 1
Nothing to do with nanny state. This is a business exercising it's right to control what appears on the servers that it owns.

Since you are seemingly fine with your daughters seeing it, give me their Skype or Kik. As you claim, they'll see it anyway, so might as well be me.


RE: Sigh...
By kickoff on 3/8/2014 12:56:57 PM , Rating: 1
yeah, they'd ignore a pedophile like you going after them and if I find you, I'll beat you to death. And believe me, I could do it easily and smile the whole time you piece of shit.

I've got lots of frequent flyer miles and I can go anywhere anytime so if you want to discuss, let me know and we'll meet. The world would be a lot better off with out pedophiles and I'll be glad to solve your problem.


RE: Sigh...
By atechfan on 3/10/2014 5:32:57 AM , Rating: 2
Another one that didn't get the point. I suppose you think "A Modest Proposal" was really promoting eating children too.


RE: Sigh...
By kickoff on 3/8/2014 1:09:27 PM , Rating: 2
You are a sick F'ing pedophile who doesn't know the difference between somebody seeing the human body and going after little girls. I would REALLY like to meet you.

Why don't you drop me an email at yahoo to jack_frack and I'll arrange to come "visit" wherever you want. You clearly need to be taken out of the gene pool and I really, REALLY want the opportunity to do it. Please write soon.


RE: Sigh...
By atechfan on 3/10/2014 5:31:42 AM , Rating: 1
Fuck, you completely missed the point. I was being sarcastic. He was mocking parents who don't want their kids to see porn. The people posting themselves wanking or whatever on Vine that this move is intended to block are doing it specifically because they hope a little girl would be watching. If you are against Vine being able to police what is shown there, you are suspect, in my book.


RE: Sigh...
By kickoff on 3/12/2014 12:56:53 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
...so might as well be me


No, I didn't miss your point at all. You went way across the line and made it personal, creepy and really disgusting. I'd break your fucking neck if I could get my hands on you.


RE: Sigh...
By Jeffk464 on 3/7/2014 8:09:34 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
show some tits and everyone loses their bricks


Boobs are hardly pornography.


RE: Sigh...
By inperfectdarkness on 3/10/2014 3:46:47 PM , Rating: 2
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the nip-slip superbowl incident...when that's less racy than what you'll see on daytime advertisements on european tv.


"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki