Lt. Gen. Davis Says Next Gen USAF Bomber Will "Of Course" Surpass $550M/Unit
March 6, 2014 9:45 AM
comment(s) - last by
Once all costs are figured in Davis says the bomber will cost more than the target per unit
When we reported on the U.S. Air Force’s plans for a
next generation long-range bomber priced at $550 million a pop
, our commenters were quick to point out that there was no way that figure could be accurate. Military procurement programs have the tendency to spiral out of control with regards to costs, as witnessed by the
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
The USAF's top acquisition officer, Lt. Gen. Charles Davis, agrees and says that costs for the bomber will definitely be higher than the quoted figure.
Davis said, “Is it going to be $550 million a copy? No, of course it’s not going to be $550 million a copy once you add in everything.”
Davis also noted that the military would try to stick as close to that budget of $550 million each as possible. One of the ways the USAF will try and keep to that budget is by preventing extra requirements and untested tech from being included in the platform.
Lt. Gen. Charles R. Davis, Military Deputy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition
And unlike the troubled F-35 program, the winning design team – Northrop Grumman or Lockheed Martin/Boeing – for the next generation bomber will only have to satisfy the needs of the USAF. The F-35 has to appease – and adjust to changing operational requirements from – the USAF, U.S. Navy, U.S. Marines and the
numerous ally nations that have bought into the program
The bomber program also got a significant boost in funding in the FY2015 budget when the funds for research, development, testing, and evaluation were bumped from $379 million to $914 million.
The USAF plans to purchase 80 to 100 of the new bombers.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Divide by 5, Multiply by 6...
3/7/2014 6:04:34 AM
Thank god someone else gets it.
Planes wear out. They're like cars--you put enough miles on them, and eventually you need a new car (or you start spending ridiculous amounts in repairs). In order to maintain proficient crews, they have to be flown. Unfortunately, class-D simulators can't suffice for aircrew training on all platforms. Fighters, for example, simply cannot recreate a high-g envioronment combat-simulation in a sim. This is the danger of having 186 F-22's; they fleet will age much faster because there are fewer of them.
Now for the record, each and every budget cut from defense--within the last 20+ years--has been offset by a commensurate increase in government entitlements spending within 5 years. Cutting our military budget to ZERO doesn't even come close to eliminating the deficit (I won't even bring up the total debt). At the end of the day though, military spending equates to a service performed, jobs being filled, and an economy prospering off contracts. The same amount of money spent on entitlements provides no services, no jobs being filled (or jobs being created) and the only economic "prospering" is from wherever those with government checks decide to spend them.
The preamble of the Constitution of the USA says nothing about standardized healthcare, medicaid, etc. In fact, it only says "promote the general welfare", not "assure the general welfare". On the other hand, it says "provide for the common defense". In laymen's terms, national defense is a mandated service the federal government is tasked with providing--whereas welfare is only something it is charged with promoting. It's the difference between "life, liberty and the guarantee of happiness" and "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".
The USAF needs this bomber. That's not a question of "if", but "when". Armchair pundits who have no experience in the military, USAF, etc--can't possibly understand.
"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer
USAF Moves Forward With Long Range Bomber Program Despite Budget Crunch
March 4, 2014, 9:44 AM
Military Officer in Charge of Lockheed F-35 Program: We Won't Pay for "Mistake after Mistake"
February 19, 2014, 11:07 AM
Australia to Delay F-35 Fighter Order by Two Years
May 4, 2012, 9:34 AM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Researchers Hope to Find "Exotic" Lifeforms Inside Crater of Dinosaur Killing Meteor
April 14, 2015, 8:47 PM
Mathematician's Sociological Formulation May Explain the "Hipster Paradox"
April 14, 2015, 1:13 PM
Cool Science Video: This is What a McDonald's Burger Looks Like in Your Stomach
April 7, 2015, 1:43 PM
Fraud Artist Engineered Stunning UK Jailbreak Via Typosquatting, Email
April 4, 2015, 2:57 PM
Most Popular Articles
America's Largest Cable Company, Comcast, Sees Internet Subscriptions Pass TV
May 4, 2015, 2:46 PM
Can id Software's Doom Find Its Way Out of a 7+ Year Development Hell?
May 19, 2015, 7:38 PM
Oculus Rift Confirms "Pause" in OS X, Linux Development, Some Devs are Mad
May 18, 2015, 11:36 PM
The Pirate Bay Loses Its Iconic Swedish Dot SE Domains
May 20, 2015, 6:31 PM
In-Depth: Apple's ~$1B Court Victory Over Samsung to be Cut up to a Third
May 18, 2015, 9:20 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information