Print 54 comment(s) - last by DougF.. on Feb 28 at 2:41 AM

German newspaper Bild am Sonntag said that the NSA is currently spying on about 320 politicians and business leaders in Germany

U.S. President Barack Obama stopped the National Security Agency's (NSA) spying on Chancellor Angela Merkel, but a German newspaper claims that the NSA is still keeping a close watch on top German government officials. 
According to Reuters, German newspaper Bild am Sonntag said that the NSA is currently spying on about 320 politicians and business leaders in Germany, including Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere, a close confidant of Merkel.
Bild am Sonntag said its information came from a high-ranking NSA employee in Germany, who chose to remain anonymous. 
"We have had the order not to miss out on any information now that we are no longer able to monitor the chancellor's communication directly," said the NSA employee, according to Bild am Sonntag.

Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Obama [SOURCE: Truth Frequency Radio]

Berlin has been looking to make a "no-spy" deal with Washington, and German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier is due to visit the U.S. on Thursday for that purpose. 

In October 2013, German magazine Der Spiegel reported that the U.S. had tapped Chancellor Merkel phone for years, and spied on 34 other world leaders as well. This led one German politician to call for a complete halt on trade negotiations between the European Union and the U.S.

But Obama attempted to calm the situation in January when he ordered the NSA to stop spying on the leaders of U.S.-allied nations.

Sources: Reuters, The Hill

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By JediJeb on 2/25/2014 6:27:48 PM , Rating: 2
The post above vividly illustrates why USA is not worthy of trust, even from its staunchest "allies". All of that spying against everyone in the world... to protect whom? Certainly not you and me.

It would be nice to live in a world where every government could trust ever other government to the point that every single statement they made what the clear and honest truth and that there were no state secrets whatsoever that were hidden from any single person in the world. But since it is possible that ANY government can say something to another that is not totally true, how is a government to know for sure what is true and what is not?

Something totally off the wall but a good example. What if some country like oh maybe France discovers a deposit of five million tons of gold and tells nobody about it. Would it be a good idea for other countries to find out about it so they could prepare in case France decided to just dump it on the open market and crash the value of gold? Or would it be better for the world to be perfectly civil and never spy on anyone and then be decimated by the actions of a few people in France? I know that scenario is totally off the wall, but how would you like to be a world leader and have to explain to your citizens why their entire savings and your economy was now in shambles and you did not even have a hint that it was about to happen?

I do believe that our Constitution here in the US gives its citizens the right to privacy and clearly states that it should not spy on its citizens without a warrant. It also does give the government the right to spy on a citizen for which it has probable cause to believe there is a crime about to be committed, but it has to take the steps to go through the court system to obtain the warrant to do so. These rules protect both the citizen and the government. The US Constitution also charges the government with the responsibility to protect its citizens, and if that means it has to gather intelligence on other nations to secure our safety then that is what it has to do. There is however a difference in keeping an eye on other countries and recording ever single thing the leader of another country says to their children and friends. I don't have a problem if the US wants to know what Germany is saying to France, or if Germany wants to know what the US is saying to Russia, that has been part of the game of governing for as long as there have been governments. But to look into the personal lives of leaders or citizens serves no purpose for national security it only serves as a way to attack or weaken that person if some dark secret if discovered. Spying is a necessary evil, but it should have a clearly defined purpose pertaining to protecting a nation, not for the furtherance of personal vendettas or gain.

"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki