backtop


Print 32 comment(s) - last by Motoman.. on Feb 17 at 1:20 PM

Verizon is roughly $18-28 USD/month more expensive than T-Mo for 6-Mo. upgrades; $8 USD/month more for 2-yr. plan

Verizon Wireless is changing gears after Verizon Inc.'s (VZ) $130B USD Sept. 2013 buyout of minority owner Vodafone Group plc (LON:VOD).  At the end of 2013 Verizon's had the highest average revenue per user (ARPU), something which both pleased and troubled analysts.  While having the industry's highest cell phone bills is good for Verizon's earnings in the short-term analysts were quick to express concern that the lack of discounts could backfire.
 
I. As Expected, Price Cuts Cometh
 
Craig Moffett, head analyst at MoffettNathanson Research, says that may no easy task, commenting in a research note:

There is a price differential where -- well, where even satisfied customers will declare enough is enough. The only question that remains is whether we have already crossed it.  They are vulnerable precisely because they have been so successful.

Jonathan Chaplin, an analyst with New Street Research, echoes in a separate note:

We expect rising competitive intensity to create a headwind for growth in 2014.  We don’t think Verizon is out of the woods. We believe competitive pressure is still coming.

This week Verizon finally acknowledged that it would need to cut prices in order to retain its dominant position.

It unveiled a new plan dubbed "More Everything".



One major impact of the new policy is that it makes Verizon's early upgrade plans much more competitive, particularly for those who have multiple smartphones on a large (>= 10 GB) family pool.
 
How does this work?  To answer that we have to first look at how the plans stacked up last year.
 
II. Early Upgrades and 2-Year Contracts -- Last Year Was a T-Mobile USA Blowout
 
Techlicious and others last year examined the price of early upgrade plans versus standard contract plans.  They compared AT&T, Inc.'s (T) Next early upgrade program and Deutsche Telekom AG (ETR:DTE) subsidiary T-Mobile USA's Jump program (the first of the early upgrade plans).
 
What they found was that the T-Mobile USA by far was the cheapest plan at 2 GB of data per month, with unlimited calling and texting.  The cheapest rival contract plan (with no early upgrade) was Verizon's, which cost $435 USD per month more, thanks to higher monthly bills ($60 USD/month for T-Mobile versus $100 USD/month on Verizon).
 
In terms of early upgrade plans T-Mobile USA's "Jump" plan was also the most affordable. With the $10 USD/month ($240 USD per 24 months) extra fee, you'd still be paying about $200 USD less than you would for a 2 year contract on Verizon.  And of course you're getting four new devices every years (trading in the old one, each time) versus only one on Verizon, and if you want to you can drop the service at any time (you're still on the hook for the device payments, but you can defray those by reselling your device and you won't be paying the early termination fees you would on Verizon).
T-Mobile Jump
For those wanting to upgrade, the Verizon $0 USD down "Edge" plan ended up costing about $370 USD extra per two years.  So Verizon was basically making money off anyone who wanted early upgrades.  Verizon also offered 6-month upgrades.  That bumped things up even more to a ~$695 USD premium, as you must have paid off 50% of the device's total costs to upgrade.
 
So for six-month upgrades on Verizon you were paying roughly $900 USD more on Verizon over two years than on T-Mobile.  That's about $38 USD per month extra.

Verizon Edge

Is Verizon's coverage advantage over T-Mobile worth $38+ USD per month?  That's debatable, but one thing's for sure -- AT&T's Next deal is worse.  AT&T's Next is even more expensive than Verizon and AT&T doesn't have as good coverage. 
 
AT&T's 3 GB tier (AT&T doesn't have a 2 GB tier) costs around $480 USD more than Verizon for a 2 year contract, and roughly $920 USD more than a two year upgrade cycle on T-Mobile.

AT&T Next

Adding "Next" will tack on nearly $500 USD more to your contract over two years.  So AT&T's 1-year upgrade cycle over the standard 2-year period is about $610 USD more than Verizon's 1 year upgrade cycle,  $260 USD more expensive than Verizon's 6-month upgrade cycle, and a miserable $1,175 USD more than T-Mobile's 6-month upgrade schedule.
 
Granted, AT&T has the fastest LTE (when available), plus you do get an extra gigabyte of data a month and somewhat better LTE coverage than T-Mobile.  But for that you're stuck in a contract, get half as many devices as T-Mobile, and are paying nearly $49 USD per month more.
 
In short, Verizon and AT&T's early upgrade plans both offered some unique perks last year, but were much more expensive ($35-50 USD/month) than T-Mobile.  A final thing worth noting is that AT&T did step up its own pricing game in Dec. 2013, bringing its Next plan's base pricing more in line with Verizon Edge.
 
III. "More Everything" Helps Verizon Blow Away AT&T's Lofty Prices, Compete With T-Mobile
 
Now, we get to the current question -- does "More Everything" make "Edge" a better deal than it was last year?
 
Verizon's new "More Everything" plan makes its "Edge" early upgrade plan a bit more competitive.  For those at the lowest data tier (250 MB) you get $15 USD off your monthly fee for smartphones.  For the majority of users who are in the 1-8 GB tiers (most customers), you'll get $10 USD off your monthly fee.  For those on plans with 10 GB or up (including pooled family data plans), you'll chop $20 USD off your fee.
 
That's a pretty nice improvement.  For users on smaller data pools you'll save $240 USD over two years, cutting the premium over T-Mobile USA down to around $28 USD.  For those on large family pools you'll cut it even further to around $18 USD per month.
 
At $18 USD per month extra, you start entering the territory that Verizon doesn't even need misleading pricing to get customers to choose it over T-Mobile USA -- some customers would consider its coverage and speed advantage worth that months, even if you are bound by a contract.

Verizon 4G LTE
Verizon leads in the LTE race. [Image Source: Verizon Wireless]

"More Everything" does not, however, eliminate some of the annoyances of "Edge".  For example you have to buy a new device, you can't bring your own like you could on T-Mobile or AT&T.

But what about customers who don't want to upgrade every 6 months?  For those willing to endure 2-year contracts there's also price breaks.  Individuals on 500MB, 1GB, or 2GB (most customers) get $10 USD off their bills.  Unlike the early upgrade pricing, there's no discount bump at 250 MB, though -- those customers get only $5 USD off their monthly bill.  Likewise those with basic phones (non-smartphones) get $5 USD off a month.

Verizon
Most customers will seem a modest price cut on their monthly bill with the rollout of "More Everything". [Image Source: PC World]

So over a two-year contract budget buyers will save $120, while regular customers will save $240 USD.  That means that T-Mobile USA (contract-free) individual customers who operate on a voluntary two-year upgrade cycle will now only be saving under $200 USD per two years, or about $8 USD a month.
 
In this case, the math works out even more favorable for Verizon -- $8 USD/month more for significantly better coverage (albeit with a contract)?  That seems an increase most customers would be willing to go for.
 
IV. "More..." Perks Sweeten the Deal
 
There's also other perks Verizon has added for More Everything subscribers:
data plans
Verizon has bumped its data allotments and given other nice perks. [Image Source: Hoovers]
  • Data Plan Bumps
    • Automatic for existing customers and new customers alike
    • $40 USD/month tier
      • Before: 500MB
      • After: 1GB
    • $50 USD/month tier
      • Before: 1GB
      • After: 2GB
    • $60 USD/month tier
      • Before: 2GB
      • After: 3GB
  • Cloud Storage
    • Free (was 5 GB free or $3 USD/month/line for 25 GB per line before)
    • 25 GB per line (up to 250 GB max on 10 lines)
  • International messaging (SMS)
    • Free
  • FamilyBase
    • Parental mobile device management software
    • free for 3 months, $5 USD/month after that
  • Cheaper long distance
    • $0.01/minute to Canada and Mexico
    • $0.05/minute to many other countries in Latin America and the Caribbean
    • free for 3 months, $5 USD/month after that
Verizon -- the nation's largest carrier -- is offering plenty of value when it comes to customers who want to upgrade every two years.  And for those who want 6-month upgrades, it still trails T-Mobile a bit, but has made it close enough -- particularly on large family data pools -- that it can justify its pricing somewhat.
 
V. A Thriving, Competitive Market
 
In this regard it's a big step forward.
 
Given that Verizon beat T-Mobile USA in new subscriptions last quarter (narrowly), this could pressure T-Mobile USA to make further cost cuts.  T-Mobile USA is profitable, so it can afford a bit of cutting.
 
And the pressure is really on AT&T which is looking ridiculous compared to both Verizon and T-Mobile now with regards to pricing.  Likewise Sprint Corp. (S) -- who doesn't offer early upgrades anymore, but does offer competitively priced "Framily" pools with unlimited data -- may feel some pricing pressure, given it own poor 4G coverage in many regions.

T-Mobile Sign
T-Mobile has pushed all the carriers to get more aggressive pricing-wise and move away from contracts and subsidies.

All of this is good news for consumers.  And yet again this justifies why mild anti-collusion regulation is necessary to maintain a competitive and free market. 

Look at AT&T's pricing (right now, pretty much the worse out there) and ask yourselves: had AT&T been allowed to merge with T-Mobile USA, would T-Mobile USA be offering the prices it does today and would Verizon feel compelled to put this much pricing pressure on everyone, as well?

Sources: Verizon Wireless, Youtube



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

ATT dropped their prices two weeks ago
By happyfirst on 2/14/2014 1:26:13 PM , Rating: 2
This was quite a hard article to understand.

Is the writer of this article not aware that ATT lowered their prices? He states checking ATT and that they have the worst pricing. I don't see that. Or is this article only talking about specific cases and then generalizing across the board?

On superbowl day, ATT slashed prices on some plans.

My ATT mobile share plan unlimited talk/text, 10gb, and 4 smartphones now only costs $160/month.

When I go to verizon's site, the same would cost $260/month.

What am I missing?




RE: ATT dropped their prices two weeks ago
By BRB29 on 2/14/2014 2:41:56 PM , Rating: 2
The ATT 4 lines, 10GB for $160 plan does not give you the phone discount. You have to get your own phone.

If you want ATT to supplement your phones, then it will be $260 a month.

That is same exact pricing as Verizon with less coverage. Verizon is a better deal.

Compare to Tmobile, 4 lines with 10GB fast data(unlimited slow data) is $140.

That is what you're missing.


By happyfirst on 2/14/2014 3:42:06 PM , Rating: 4
Yeah, Verizon has "better" coverage. But ATT has "faster" network. So which is truly better depends on what one values more. And how one actually defines "better" or "faster". So personally, to be fair, on the contract pricing, I'll just call it a wash between the two.

But what if you do have your own phone? This article talks a lot about TMobile where you also have to get your own phone. Then ATT is only $160. So what's the better deal then? Does Verizon offer a similar deal?

What happens with Verizon when your contract is up AND you're still happy with your phone and don't want a new one. Is it still worth it paying full contract price? Or do you let Verizon sucker you back into a new contract in exchange for a new phone? At least ATT is starting to cater to both crowds. If coverage isn't an issue, then which is better? Verizon for only letting you choose between continuing to pay a lot or get a new phone you don't want OR ATT for ALSO additionally letting you choose to save even more and switch to the nocontract pricing plan?

I've had Sprint, Verizon, and currently am ATT. For the record, I hate them all. Coverage wise, for my family, Sprint had some holes in their coverage but it wasn't the end of the world. Verizon and ATT are the same, coverage wise, can't tell a difference. They just work. But Verizon just charges too much and IMO it's finally catching up with them, hence, why we now see them dropping prices. Let's remember, Verizon is only the same contract pricing starting yesterday when they announced this new more plan. I've been with ATT now for a year and coverage is fine, I make and receive calls just fine, so coverage to me at least seems irrelevant. Nobody in my family has complained about coverage. ATT offered a BETTER price earlier, and an even BETTER price a few weeks ago. When switching from Verizon, we were worried, but it's turned out to be a non-issue.

IMO, Verizon's "increased" coverage is greatly overhyped. I can get for some people that because of coverage Verizon is truly the only way for them to go and I can understand these Verizon people arguing coverage, coverage, coverage, but they need to keep in mind, they're the exception, not the rule. Most people are in areas with sufficient coverage from multiple vendors. Verizon knows this or they wouldn't be pressed so hard to drop prices. It will be interesting to see how long Verizon can go without offering cheaper nocontract BYOD plans.


By Belegost on 2/14/2014 4:42:18 PM , Rating: 3
So my wife was considering moving to the TMO plan for our 2 phones.

Then ATT went and let us get 10GB of shared data with our 2 phones at 130/month (before my corp discount) at just 1 year into our contract - effectively dropping the contract price a year early.

That move was honestly genius for holding onto customers. Now if we wanted to go to TMO it would only be $10 less per month for the plan (we regularly use around 8-9GB/month so TMOs 2.5GB is not enough), but we would need to buy new phones, and deal with worse LTE coverage in our area.

Also VZW touts their coverage a lot, but my parents have it, and the LTE coverage may be more than ATT, but ATT's HSPA coverage is better than VZW's LTE, and it makes a difference, when my parent's phones drop off LTE they're on EVDO at 500Kbps with latency measured seconds. I may drop off LTE more, but HSPA is a good fall back with 3-5Mbps and decent latency. So overall, I say the coverage is even.


By hangfirew8 on 2/15/2014 9:55:14 AM , Rating: 4

quote:
What am I missing?


You're missing that you're reading DT. If you expect fact-checking and good copy editing, go over to the sister site AnandTech.


"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki