backtop


Print 68 comment(s) - last by Jeffk464.. on Feb 15 at 4:51 PM

Model X will have falcon wing doors says Musk

Tesla CEO Elon Musk was on hand recently at a Q&A session in Norway and he offered up some information on current and future Tesla vehicles.
 
One of the vehicles that Musk talked about was the upcoming Model X. Musk explained that the Model X will have the same wheelbase as the Model S, and that its length will be within 2” of the sedan. The Model X, however, will be quite a bit taller given that it’s a crossover (and to provide additional headroom for the third-row passengers).
 
Since the Model X will be heavier than the Model S, Tesla figures that the X will have about 10% higher energy consumption.


Tesla Model X Concept
 
Musk also stated that the production Model X would definitely retain the "Falcon Doors" for rear seat occupants. The rear doors are hinged in the roof instead B-pillar, which should allow for easier entry/exit in tight parking spaces. All-wheel-drive will be standard on the Model X with a separate electric motor driving the front wheels.
 
Speaking of AWD, the Model S will receive AWD as an option once the Model X goes into production. Tesla promises that AWD versions of the car will have the same driving range as the current RWD version; something that rarely (if ever) occurs with gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicles.


Tesla Model S
 
“Typical experience of AWD is that the efficiency will be worse. We've worked really hard to not have that same effect,” explained Tesla CTO JB Straubel. “We found some clever ways with dual motor AWD, not just mechanical linkage. To make that an efficiency neutral option breakthrough. Flat efficiency tradeoff.”
 
Software updates coming to the Model S will add a hill-hold function and allow manual selecting of ride height over a wider range of speeds.  Feature updates coming down the road will include guidance lines on the backup camera, adaptive cruise control, and Musk also promised that Model S cars coming off the line in the near future would have more comfortable front seats. The new seat can be retrofitted into existing cars.

Source: Tesla Motors Club



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

One thing...
By ewhite06 on 2/11/2014 1:34:13 PM , Rating: 2
Is it still going to be ~$80,000? Ok - just checking.




RE: One thing...
By coburn_c on 2/11/2014 1:44:38 PM , Rating: 2
Considering the AWD requires double the drive train with their method, probably 100k.


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 2:24:53 PM , Rating: 1
The Model X will be AWD-only. Elon has mentioned it will be more expensive in the "low single digits" as in, about $5k more than the Model S.

I'm expecting at least a $85k model and a $100k Performance model with the high-power inverters.

I would not be surprised if they cancelled the 60kWh model, the battery would wear faster due to the higher peak and average power output, and EPA range would dip 10% to about 189 miles.

I don't care for the X, but the Model S AWD is going to be ridiculous.


RE: One thing...
By Jeffk464 on 2/15/2014 4:51:46 PM , Rating: 2
ah common a motor cant cost $20,000


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 2:12:05 PM , Rating: 2
As you well know, the Model E released in 2017 or 2018 will be about $35,000.

The magic price point for EVs is around $500/month. Fuel cost is negligible. Once you can lease a Tesla for that price, every single sedan from the Toyota Camry and above is irrelevant.


RE: One thing...
By Reclaimer77 on 2/11/14, Rating: 0
RE: One thing...
By quiksilvr on 2/11/2014 2:56:00 PM , Rating: 2
I see it happening. In 4 years they went from a $100,000+ Roadster to a $70,000 Model S. Hell, they could come out with a much more compact 4 door car with a way less beefier engine and smaller battery and sell it for $50,000 if they wanted to now. So in 4 years with battery tech improving and less R&D costs due to previous work on their other Tesla cars, making a sub $40,000 electric car with a 200 mile range should be possible.


RE: One thing...
By Solandri on 2/11/2014 4:55:33 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
I see it happening. In 4 years they went from a $100,000+ Roadster to a $70,000 Model S. [...] So in 4 years with battery tech improving and less R&D costs due to previous work on their other Tesla cars, making a sub $40,000 electric car with a 200 mile range should be possible.

So with the price dropping $30,000 every 4 years, by 2026, Tesla will be paying you $20,000 to take one of their cars from them.

http://xkcd.com/605/


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/14, Rating: 0
RE: One thing...
By Reclaimer77 on 2/11/14, Rating: -1
RE: One thing...
By SeeManRun on 2/11/2014 4:24:45 PM , Rating: 3
The first flights were for the rich, as were the first cars, refrigerators, and indoor plumbing. Everything starts out for the wealthy because they are the only ones that can pay such high initial costs.

The supercharger is not meant to service every Tesla owner all the time. But if you happen to be going the same way, it is a very nice convenience to have. And if they can expand to more areas, great; but you don't buy a Tesla with the intention of heavy supercharger use.


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 4:28:55 PM , Rating: 2
Camry for $350/mo, plus $200/mo in fuel costs, or a third-gen Tesla, essentially an electric BMW, for about the same total cost. Even at a slight premium, the Tesla is guaranteed to sell out.

quote:
My only point is that when that $500 lease point for the Tesla approaches, the Camry and other sedans are still going to be top sellers. Hardly "irrelevant".


Of course. I was just joking about irrelevant. Tesla could sell the best car in the world for $20k, and they'd still be limited by their comparatively tiny production capacity.

By the time any of this happens, hopefully the Volt and Prius will have caught up a little bit.


RE: One thing...
By Spuke on 2/11/2014 5:05:44 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Camry for $350/mo, plus $200/mo in fuel costs, or a third-gen Tesla
Quit making sh!t up! $200/mo in fuel for a Camry? Not with the Camry's fuel economy and not with your average commute are you going to be paying $200 a month in fuel. I pay ROUGHLY $200 a month in fuel for a 27 mpg (actual hand calculated) sports car with a 66 mile round trip per day commute.


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/14, Rating: 0
RE: One thing...
By Spuke on 2/11/14, Rating: 0
RE: One thing...
By robertgu on 2/11/2014 9:19:12 PM , Rating: 3
And yet you assume Camry will use $200 in fuel costs per month, which back of the napkin calcs using $4.00 per gallon avg fuel costs and 27 MPG equals to about 1,350 miles per month.

But you in the earlier post are saying the Tesla will be $500 per month lease yet decide to not include the cost increase to the monthly electric bill? If you want to make comparisons you need to be more through and try to make as much an apples to apples comparison to have legitimacy good sir.


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 10:15:19 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
If you want to make comparisons you need to be more through and try to make as much an apples to apples comparison to have legitimacy good sir.


No.. If I wanted to do an apples-to-apples comparison, I wouldn't be comparing the Model E with a Camry, but rather with a BMW 3 Series or Audi A4.

I made a quick example without doing any calculations, to show that even the most popular mid-size in the USA is within the same ballpark as the Model E. The very next line says "Even at a slight premium", implying the total cost of the Model E would actually be higher. Meaning, anyone in the market for a Camry might choose to opt for a Model E instead. Is this really so hard to understand?


RE: One thing...
By half_duplex on 2/12/2014 11:30:47 AM , Rating: 2
I drive an A4 and my sisters BF drives a gen 2 Model S.

It is a really nice interior and basically a xvga screen on the dash, but we took a few longer than average drives in it and they were constantly looking for super chargers. We basically had to stop either before or after every hour or so drive for "starbucks" while he plugged up. I couldn't handle that.


RE: One thing...
By Nutzo on 2/12/2014 1:26:07 PM , Rating: 2
This is exactly why electic cars will never replace gas cars unless there is a huge breakthough in battery capacity and charging speed.

With the rising electricity prices (at least here in California), and with states getting ready to start charging a mileage tax on electric cars to pay for the highways, the cost saving will largely disappear.


RE: One thing...
By Reclaimer77 on 2/12/2014 2:53:41 PM , Rating: 2
Ugh ridiculous. Your sisters BF can obviously afford to piss away half a day at Starbucks charging up, but most Americans can't. Which is why EV's will never be ready for prime time, way too impracticable for the majority.


RE: One thing...
By Qapa on 2/11/2014 2:56:58 PM , Rating: 2
As Reclaimer is saying, that is highly doubtful.

Either range will drop or price will be higher.

It is actually not "his fault", but I don't think battery will reach that point that soon.

And I think he also had made some estimates for previous cars that were also on lower price...

Again, great cars, but the battery is still keeping with lower range or higher price.

But even if he can put out a... let's say 40k with 150 real miles it would be a great achievement.

Nissan is also trying to get to somewhere near that...

I'd bet both will fall short of the promises, but still any improvements are welcome and are a path to EVs being more mainstream ready.


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 3:21:18 PM , Rating: 4
Neither of you actually suggested any reason as to why it's doubtful. Keep in mind Tesla's successive "impossible" achievements, world's first and second worthwhile electric car, supercharger network, Consumer Reports 99%, etc.

Then remember that the $35k third-gen vehicle was the goal all along. And now they're building the world's largest battery factory. With scale comes cost reduction. Everything hinges on that factory.


RE: One thing...
By Spuke on 2/11/14, Rating: 0
RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 6:03:17 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
What impossible achievements has he done?


quote:
Keep in mind Tesla's successive "impossible" achievements, world's first and second worthwhile electric car, supercharger network, Consumer Reports 99%, etc.


quote:
Everything he's done is entirely possible with today's battery tech

..LOL. No shit, but everyone SAID it would be impossible before the Roadster and Model S.

quote:
($100k price point for the vehicle and not giving zero f%^ks about making money from this)

Starts at $70k pre-credit, margins are ~30%

quote:
And wasn't the Model X supposed to be the cheap car?

No


RE: One thing...
By Spuke on 2/11/2014 6:34:44 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
No
No? Oh yeah! Now you guys don't remember. LOL! That's ok, I do.


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 7:26:50 PM , Rating: 2
Some media erroneously printed that last year, I am guessing that's why you are confused.


RE: One thing...
By Rukkian on 2/12/2014 9:14:22 AM , Rating: 2
The model X was always supposed to be a crossover. The cheaper one was always the one after the X, which apparently is now referred to as the "E". Originally, the X was going to come out this year, but was delayed, with the follow up sometime in late 2015 or 2016, however, quite awile ago, it was reported that those timeframes have been moved back. Some media outlets decided to use some poetic license and claim that the X (now coming in 2015-2016) would be the cheaper car, but they were wrong.

I can see an issue with slipping timelines, but the X was never mentioned by Tesla to be a cheaper car. If they can build a crossover with the same fit and finish, and get near the range, there is no way it will be cheaper. They would have to cut quite a few corners to do that at this point.


RE: One thing...
By Reclaimer77 on 2/12/14, Rating: -1
RE: One thing...
By robertgu on 2/11/2014 9:30:45 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
And now they're building the world's largest battery factory. With scale comes cost reduction. Everything hinges on that factory.


IIRC, the biggest limiter on reducing the costs of automotive grade battery packs isn't the manufacturing efficiencies, it's the materials, i.e. lithium. I know lithium is rare and hard to acquire. With the increase in lithium based automotive battery packs it's extremely likely this raw material will continue to sky rocket in pricing (law of supply and demand).

I'm pulling for Tesla. I hope they find new battery chemistries which will allow them to obtain the range and performance they want while significantly reducing it's costs by using more efficient or cheaper raw materials.


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 10:37:11 PM , Rating: 2
Saw recent video Q&A where it was actually mentioned that there is no shortage of lithium, that lithium is not as important as people think and that the real problem is nickel. I will post it if I can find it again.


RE: One thing...
By McGaiden on 2/11/2014 4:16:13 PM , Rating: 1
Their stated aim was 2016 and 2017 as last resort.

In a recent interview, their design chief went out on a limb and said we could see one in early 2015.
(Source: http://green.autoblog.com/2013/12/16/tesla-model-e...

The company came back to the press and essentially denied what he said. It was a moment of candor from his side, so it's likely they are aiming for a 2015 release but don't want to commit to one because they understand it's better to underaim and overperform than the other way 'round.

Nevertheless, we should probably realistically expect Model E in 2016 and possibly as soon as 2015 if we're lucky. There's still almost 2 years to the last few months of 2015 if they are aiming for a pre-Christmas release.


RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 5:00:55 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
it's likely they are aiming for a 2015 release


Did you not read the article you linked? It says the Model E might be shown at an auto show in 2015. Not released.

When it was announced in 2012, the Model X was supposed to start delivery in 2013, volume in 2014. Haven't even seen the production model yet. Expect delays.

The battery factory is a requisite for the Model E and it's not even close to being built yet. I'm saying Q1 2018.


RE: One thing...
By Reclaimer77 on 2/11/14, Rating: -1
RE: One thing...
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 6:05:15 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, just like the Model S and Roadster were vaporware.


RE: One thing...
By Spuke on 2/11/2014 6:36:47 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Yes, just like the Model S and Roadster were vaporware.
No, none of those were vaporware. Again, making sh!t up.


RE: One thing...
By Nutzo on 2/12/2014 1:16:48 PM , Rating: 2
Sure, because the 600 mile cruising range, and quick 3 minute fillup of my Camry hybrid is irrelevant.

It's much better to have to stop for 30 minutes every 150 miles so I can quick-charge a car and to plan my road trip based on where you can actually find one of these quick-charge stations. FYI: 30 minutes is NOT quick compared to filling up a gas tank.


But these doors...
By AdamAnon on 2/11/2014 6:03:39 PM , Rating: 1
Even I could afford it I'd probably stay away from this car because of these doors. Too weird. I'd be embarrassed to open them in a public parking lot.




RE: But these doors...
By Nutzo on 2/12/2014 1:29:58 PM , Rating: 2
Could also be a problem in some parking garages that have low roofs.

I'd have to see the actual open height of the door, but I doubt I could open the door without hitting the shelf I have over the cars in my garage, or hitting the garage door or opener.



Blech
By coburn_c on 2/11/14, Rating: -1
RE: Blech
By Reclaimer77 on 2/11/14, Rating: -1
RE: Blech
By kwrzesien on 2/11/2014 4:15:06 PM , Rating: 2
Come on, this isn't competing with a Jeep! This is for the metropolitan upscale families that are considering an X5, Cayenne, ML500, GL550, MDX or a Cadillac SUV. As those vehicles range from $50,000 - $90,000 and up and are mostly used less than 100 miles a day and are semi-prestige vehicles, the Model X will be the hottest item on the block.


RE: Blech
By Reclaimer77 on 2/11/14, Rating: 0
RE: Blech
By Spuke on 2/11/2014 5:15:27 PM , Rating: 2
To be honest Rec, they have to put AWD in there to compete with the other Xovers and SUV's in that price range even if none of their customers ever use it.


RE: Blech
By SeeManRun on 2/11/2014 4:26:07 PM , Rating: 3
People like AWD for ice and wet slippery conditions. I don't believe crossovers are for off road anyway, that is what the SUV was for and we know how often people took those off road.


RE: Blech
By Reclaimer77 on 2/11/14, Rating: -1
RE: Blech
By grant3 on 2/11/2014 5:44:53 PM , Rating: 2
o_o wow. not sure if you're sarcastic or honestly hypocritical here.

Since AWD is mostly a marketing gimmick, it's pretty obvious that the "reason" for including it on teslas, subarus, or any other model is to help sell high-margin vehicles. And from a business perspective, that's a very legitimate reason.


RE: Blech
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 4:47:37 PM , Rating: 3
I'd say the inverse, there's pretty much zero reason NOT to do an AWD EV.

The benefits of Model S/X AWD:

1. Electric AWD allows for the world's best traction control, which means safety in poor road conditions. Tons of Model S in Norway and elsewhere would appreciate AWD.

2. Unlike with an ICE car, there is almost no efficiency reduction (JB Straubel has said there is actually none, but we'll see).

3. Better acceleration, needless to say. Can't wait to see the acceleration time for the Model S AWD.

4. Possibly higher top speed. The current Model S uses a single gear which puts the top speed at 130mph at around 14,000rpm. The front motor could be geared differently, allowing for higher speeds at lower RPM on the Autobahn.

5. The cost increase over a RWD model will be tiny (6-10%?), so definitely worth it.

6. Adds to the growing list of superlatives, more PR and word-of-mouth marketing, this in and of itself makes AWD worth it.


RE: Blech
By Reclaimer77 on 2/11/2014 4:57:12 PM , Rating: 2
Current Tesla's do not function properly in extreme cold. So the idea of an AWD electric vehicle on current technology for winter weather is a wash. Tons of Model S's in Norway, what!?

quote:
2. Unlike with an ICE car, there is almost no efficiency reduction (JB Straubel has said there is actually none, but we'll see).


Physics wise, that's not possible. Electric motors are efficient, but not 100% efficient. Powering all the wheels takes more energy than just two, can't get around that.

You've also added, wait for it, more weight to the vehicle. More weight, less efficient.

quote:
5. The cost increase over a RWD model will be tiny (6-10%?), so definitely worth it.


Explain please? How is using twice the number of motors and associated hardware a "tiny" expense?


RE: Blech
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 5:50:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Current Tesla's do not function properly in extreme cold. So the idea of an AWD electric vehicle on current technology for winter weather is a wash. Tons of Model S's in Norway, what!?


We're clearly looking at different information. http://www.youtube.com/user/bjornnyland/videos No trouble here with 1000+ mile trips, or leaving the car parked outside for a month. They are popular in Norway due to tax breaks, which I know you're fond of.

quote:
Physics wise, that's not possible. Electric motors are efficient, but not 100% efficient. Powering all the wheels takes more energy than just two, can't get around that.


Two motors spinning at a low power output may be more efficient than one motor spinning at high power, especially when accelerating. The front motor may be geared differently which changes efficiency numbers again.

quote:
You've also added, wait for it, more weight to the vehicle. More weight, less efficient.


It's important to distinguish between mechanical efficiency and added weight. Regardless, I don't feel like looking up the number right now but I believe the motor weighs <100lbs which means a <2% weight increase, which translates into a negligible power increase.

quote:
Explain please? How is using twice the number of motors and associated hardware a "tiny" expense?


Because the motor is cheap. Have you seen one? It's a ball of wires about the size of a watermelon.


RE: Blech
By coburn_c on 2/11/2014 6:03:47 PM , Rating: 2
OH boy, a youtube channel with fan videos of Elon Musky against major car reviewers...

and 500ft-lb AC motors are NOT cheap


RE: Blech
By Reclaimer77 on 2/11/2014 10:20:05 PM , Rating: 2
He talks like you just drive down to the local RC Hobby shop to grab a Tesla Model S electric motor for a few bucks lol.


RE: Blech
By flyingpants1 on 2/11/2014 10:50:20 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Elon has mentioned it will be more expensive in the "low single digits" as in, about $5k more than the Model S.


quote:
The cost increase over a RWD model will be tiny (6-10%?)


Refer to my previous comments made in this thread, which both of you probably already read, and yet you still feel the need to post these troll comments.. You guys are anti-EV weirdos that don't argue in good faith.


RE: Blech
By Reclaimer77 on 2/12/2014 11:27:06 AM , Rating: 2
OK Mr. $200 monthly fuel costs...


RE: Blech
By ScotterQX6700 on 2/11/2014 6:18:17 PM , Rating: 2
All wheel drive benefits are not limited to off-road. It gives greater traction and stability in many situations, including rain and snow. Remember, Tesla's are being sold around the world, including Countries like Norway.


RE: Blech
By robertgu on 2/11/2014 9:32:37 PM , Rating: 2
If you live in the snow belt you would be taking a totally different line of thinking in terms of AWD Cross-over.


RE: Blech
By amanojaku on 2/11/2014 4:26:28 PM , Rating: 3
Crossovers are for people who need to carry extra passengers or cargo, but don't want or need the towing capacity and off-road capabilities of a truck. They're the modern-day station wagon, only better looking. A crossover makes more sense than the traditional SUV due to improved fuel economy; they're based on car platforms, whereas SUVs are based on trucks.

AWD is generally misunderstood. It's not just useful for off-roading. It has utility in all low-traction situations. In theory, a properly designed AWD car can transfer engine torque and HP to any wheel in any amount. If the rear wheels are stuck in ice, snow, or mud, the front wheels could have 100% of the torque and HP. If the car is accelerating, the rear wheels could have 100% of the torque and HP. If the car is turning, the outside wheels would have, say, 65% of the engine torque and HP (outside wheels must spin faster than inside wheels for best cornering performance).

Personally, an EV should not be AWD, it should be IWD, where each wheel has its own motor. No central drive shaft means less weight and frictional losses from a drive train, etc...


RE: Blech
By coburn_c on 2/11/2014 4:35:15 PM , Rating: 1
Station wagons look way better than crossovers. Look at the CTS wagon next to the SRX.

Torque vectoring in a crossover? Are you kidding me? If you want a car to corner well you wouldn't make a crossover.

And don't even get me started on a Tesla in the snow..

http://www.edmunds.com/tesla/model-s/2013/long-ter...

As for four motors.. the last thing you need in an EV or a crossover is more weight.


RE: Blech
By coburn_c on 2/11/2014 4:41:35 PM , Rating: 2
Another thing I don't understand, why do Teslas have an engine compartment and hood? I mean these is no engine in there, the batteries are under the seat... it's like they want you to think it's an actual car and not a fast golf cart.


RE: Blech
By Spuke on 2/11/2014 5:17:16 PM , Rating: 2
There's storage space in the front. Why waste it?


RE: Blech
By coburn_c on 2/11/2014 5:33:30 PM , Rating: 1
Well if you're building a vehicle to haul more people, why not use all the available space. Wouldn't there be more space if you pushed the cabin forward?


RE: Blech
By SeeManRun on 2/11/2014 6:00:35 PM , Rating: 2
In the event of a crash you need a crumple zone.


RE: Blech
By coburn_c on 2/11/2014 6:05:10 PM , Rating: 1
So why isn't there a hood and compartment on the sides and in the back?


RE: Blech
By Spuke on 2/11/2014 6:29:10 PM , Rating: 2
Now you're being stupid.


RE: Blech
By amanojaku on 2/11/2014 5:30:06 PM , Rating: 2
Both vehicles are ugly to me, but the SRX is WAY better looking than the CTS Wagon. I'm not the only one who thinks so, since the SRX has been Cadillac's best selling car every years starting in 2010.

All cars benefit from torque vectoring. The high weight and center of gravity means a crossover is in greater need of traction at the wheels than a smaller car. People don't buy a car to inspect its traction (they should, but few people understand it, including you); they buy a car for what it can hold, its looks, its upfront cost and it's cost of ownership (fuel economy, maintenance, etc...)

That Tesla article you provided didn't say anything about the car's performance in snow. It said the car doesn't brake or charge the same due to the cold. In other words, it takes longer to charge, and the car brakes like a regular car without regenerative breaking. Not exactly a crisis, even if it's undesirable.

The four motors... They're smaller than a single, large motor. And there's no drive train (if using wheel hub engines) or a short drive train (if using inboard engines), so the weight would actually be LESS.

The front hood is a trunk, and the car is far more resilient than a golf cart.


RE: Blech
By coburn_c on 2/11/2014 5:37:59 PM , Rating: 2
Ah well I guess it's just a matter of opinion.

My opinion is that the SRX is absolutely disgusting. My opinion is that four motors would weigh a lot more than a driveshaft or just a rear motor. My opinion is that an EV becomes twice as annoying in freezing weather... well that one is actually a fact..


RE: Blech
By Spuke on 2/11/2014 6:30:02 PM , Rating: 2
Uh, the CTS Wagon is badass! The new SRX is not even close. I liked the old SRX though.


RE: Blech
By CharonPDX on 2/11/2014 10:00:00 PM , Rating: 2
We had snow/ice here over the weekend. About 6 inches of snow, with about half an inch of ice on top. We have one AWD vehicle and one 2WD vehicle.

Our driveway is uphill. Gravel. About 50 feet long, 10 feet incline to the street. (Plus a flat stretch right next to the house.)

The AWD climbed right out. Getting up from its dry spot up on to the snow/ice was the hardest part, and didn't even do any sliding there. That was when the accumulation had stopped, but it was still cold. The roads were still nasty, "slushy" at best on main drags, but still driving on top of snow/ice on the side streets.

The 2WD, on the other hand... Yeah, didn't even TRY to drive it until the snow/ice had started melting. Waited until the main roads were clear, and the side streets "slush with bare pavement visible in the ruts". I definitely missed the AWD when trying to get my car out of the driveway this morning. One wheel was slipping, so traction control stopped the drive axle completely. I had to get BOTH tires on that axle on solid footing to get it to move. (Of course, the non-drive-axle's tires were on perfectly fine ground...)


RE: Blech
By Rukkian on 2/12/2014 10:47:31 AM , Rating: 2
In the snow belt (Iowa doesn't get as much as say MN, but they have no idea how to plow around here), a good AWD can make the difference between sliding all over, and actually going where you want to go. CUV's are not really meant for offroading, but light trail driving can be done in some (my Forester has seen some crappy, muddy roads going to some boy scout campouts).
The AWD for the Model S, and X will not be made for offroading at all, it will make commuting in snowy regions much safer, easier (if done right).


"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki