Print 23 comment(s) - last by wallijonn.. on Feb 12 at 11:12 AM

Apple's attempt at escaping the consequences has failed

Apple was unsuccessful in getting rid of its external eBooks monitor, but the tech giant was at least able to get him to tone his behavior down a bit (via the court, of course). 
According to a new report from Reuters, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said that Apple's external eBooks monitor -- Michael Bromwich -- will not be put on hold as Apple requested. 
Bromwich will, however, have to cut back on his methods of monitoring. According to the court, Bromwich is limited to assessing Apple's compliance policies and its efforts to pass those policies along to its workers effectively. This means he cannot investigate whether Apple employees are actually complying with antitrust laws or not. 
Last month, Apple said Bromwich is too "intrusive" and could interfere with Apple's ability to create new products, adding that he aggressively sought interviews with top executives and attempted to reach company documents that were outside of his duties. 
Apple also said that Bromwich is charging Apple far too much for his services -- about $1,100 per hour to be exact.

Michael Bromwich [SOURCE:]

The tech company requested a hearing regarding putting Bromwich's duties on hold until Apple is ready with a formal appeal, but it looks like that isn't happening. However, Apple is still preparing a formal appeal, but will have to continue dealing with Bromwich in the meantime. 

Bromwich was sent to Apple as a monitor due to a court ruling last July that found Apple guilty of conspiring to raise e-book prices. U.S. District Judge Denise Cote handed down the ruling, saying that consumers and competitors were negatively affected by the arrangement Apple had with five book publishers. The publishers were Hachette Livre (Lagardère Publishing France), Harper Collins (News Corp., U.S.A.), Simon & Schuster (CBS Corp., U.S.A.), Penguin (Pearson Group, United Kingdom) and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holzbrinck (owner of inter alia Macmillan, Germany).

Judge Cote sees Apple's complaints as further reason for having the external monitor in place. In other words, Apple is mad that it was caught acting out-of-line, and doesn't want to pay the consequences. 

"If anything, Apple's reaction to the existence of a monitorship underscores the wisdom of its imposition," said Judge Cote.

Source: Reuters

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Just got to put this in perspective
By retrospooty on 2/11/2014 5:05:09 PM , Rating: 2
"If Apple can't comply with the law and put up with ONE guy, maybe it's time to really punish them. I've never seen such an arrogant and obnoxious corporate entity in my life.

Their reaction to this is just making it harder on them, but they seem oblivious that the world doesn't revolved around them. Can a Corporation be a narcissist? I thin it can!"

Honestly, if Apple didn't exist, and you asked that same question, I would have said no, and I would have thought that you had issues to even think such nonsense... But Apple has proven time and time again that it is arrogant, obnoxious and narcissistic. You are absolutely right.

RE: Just got to put this in perspective
By tonyswash on 2/11/14, Rating: -1
By retrospooty on 2/11/2014 5:21:18 PM , Rating: 2
Really? You don't see it? Imagine that, the hugest Apple fan I have ever seen doesn't see that Apple can be arrogant, obnoxious and narcissistic.

OK, lets see... The whole Mac v PC campaign, and lets not forget, "Your holding it wrong" " Narcissistic - The above issue, and The concept of blatantly copying from other companies and then suing when they are copied - and many many more examples I know you have heard (and defended) before.

Ya, it must just be me being childish.

By Cheesew1z69 on 2/11/2014 5:24:02 PM , Rating: 2
That is being childish? Does the truth hurt Tony?

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Latest Headlines
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki