backtop


Print 8 comment(s) - last by Rage187.. on Feb 12 at 9:58 AM

Google wants a place to test its systems while Foxconn is looking to implement robotic systems

Foxconn -- the trading name for Hon Hai Precision Co. in China -- is often associated with Apple, since it assembles the Cupertino giant's devices like the iPhone and iPad. But as it turns out, Foxconn is a mutual acquaintance with Apple's most fierce competitor in the mobile OS realm. 
 
According to The Wall Street Journal, Google and Foxconn have been quietly working together since last year, but not on mobile products like smartphones and tablets -- rather, the two are focused on their respective robotics ventures, and how they can help one another achieve their goals.
 
In March 2013, Andy Rubin -- the Google executive responsible for the Android operating system -- stepped down as Android chief at Google. Since the resignation of that particular position, he's been working with Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page to start a new Google robotics group. 
 
Rubin said that there are many potential applications for robotics, such as in manufacturing and logistics markets. Rubin would like to see a robotics operating system help with electronics assembly and compete with the likes of Amazon in the retail market. 
 
The group is not looking to create robots for consumer use, much like its X lab that creates products like Google Glass and the autonomous vehicle. Instead, the robotics effort will have one main goal (at least for now): get products to the market faster and sell, sell, sell. 
 
A partnership with Foxconn could help, considering it'd be a good testing environment for Google's new robotic operating system. 
 

[SOURCE: X bit Labs]

Foxconn, on the other hand, is seeking help from Google in the robotics realm as well. For instance, Hon Hai Chairman Terry Gou said in 2011 that he wanted 300,000 robots installed by the end of 2012 and a total of 1 million by 2014. However, in June 2012, it was apparent that those targets weren't going to happen. Instead, he hoped to have "monotonous" tasks eliminated through automation within a few years and fully automated plants in five to 10 years.
 
Foxconn's issues with installing the robots comes down to cost and technology. Foxconn would have to spend anywhere from $2.1 billion to over $10 billion for fully automated plants, depending on the type of robots used. Foxconn's traditional capital spending is below $3 billion.
 
Also, technology is ever changing, and keeping up with the production cycles of different products would take more time than having humans perform the same task. For instance, once you've finished stabilizing the process for one product, it's already time for a new product to roll down the line.
 
Rubin met with Gou in Taipei recently to discuss robotics, where Rubin showed off new automation technologies that could be helpful. Gou reportedly expressed excitement toward the new tech, possibly starting a new relationship that could be beneficial to both sides. 
 
Foxconn is also looking to invest in research and technology locations in the U.S., and forming ties with another major U.S. tech company wouldn't be a bad idea in the midst of that venture. 

Source: The Wall Street Journal



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Sorry China
By McGaiden on 2/11/2014 4:12:11 PM , Rating: -1
First, China's manufacturing employment peaked in 1996, and it's been decreasing every year since then for other reasons than technology/automation.

Also, wage increases and a shift to a more consumer-led economy is more likely to increase this trend than automation, since if robotics were as lucrative as a lot of people thought, then we'd see those 1 million robots already.

Thirdly, don't underestimate the political pressure on Foxconn to keep those robots away for as long as possible from the CCP to keep employment up.

I always laugh when idiotic "U-S-A U-S-A U-S-A!!"-esque commenters reveal their idiocy. We're seeing a lot stronger trends of automation/robotics in the U.S. than in China for now, even if the Chinese can afford it. That will continue.

Suck on it.


RE: Sorry China
By Shig on 2/11/2014 4:28:17 PM , Rating: 2
Congratulations, you win the internet.


RE: Sorry China
By amanojaku on 2/11/2014 4:42:36 PM , Rating: 2
Your four points were brilliant, but your anti-USA comment was unnecessary. Shig didn't say anything about China's loss being America's, or anyone else's, gain. Particularly since you're correct, manufacturing is increasingly automated. This was pointed out when both Apple and Samsung talked about bringing manufacturing to the US. There would not be a significant increase in jobs, just a significant increase in press.


RE: Sorry China
By Spookster on 2/11/2014 4:56:10 PM , Rating: 2
I always laugh when idiotic "Anti-USA"-esque commenters reveal their idiocy and automatically assume that the person they are bashing is from the USA.


"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki