backtop


Print 67 comment(s) - last by vortmax2.. on Feb 13 at 11:14 AM

Today's decision by the NHTSA marks a transition from V2V research to taking the next steps toward actual implementation in new vehicles

It's been decided that vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications, which allow cars and trucks to "talk" with one another and their surroundings, will move from just research to actual implementation thanks to a recent approval. 

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) wants to put V2V technology in all new cars and trucks as a way of avoiding traffic accidents and fatalities. For example, your car could let you know that another vehicle ahead is about to blow through a stop sign in an attempt to avoid a crash.

Research regarding V2V communications has been ongoing for quite some time now. Ten major automakers and technology companies have been working with NHTSA’s Connected Vehicle Research Program since 2012 in a V2V pilot study in Ann Arbor, Michigan, for example.

But today's decision by the NHTSA marks a transition from V2V research to taking the next steps toward actual implementation in new vehicles.


Automakers like Audi, Volkswagen, BMW, Ford, General Motors, Honda and Toyota have all started developing some type of V2V technology, but NHTSA's new push for making such technology required in new vehicles will likely put forward some sort of standard to ensure that everyone is on the same page and that vehicles from different automakers can communicate with one another effectively. 

Automakers have voiced concerns in the past regarding V2V communications, saying that such technology could add thousands of dollars to the price tags of new vehicles, making them more difficult to sell. 

But the overall sentiment is that the technology can save lives. According to DOT, V2V could prevent 70 to 80 percent of vehicle crashes involving unimpaired drivers, which could help prevent thousands of deaths and injuries on U.S. roads annually.

The tech uses a 360-degree view of a vehicle’s surroundings, allowing the car to detect what the driver cannot. A dedicated short range radio network is also used to allow vehicles to communicate with each other up to 300 yards away. 

"Vehicle-to-vehicle technology represents the next generation of auto safety improvements, building on the life-saving achievements we've already seen with safety belts and air bags," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. "By helping drivers avoid crashes, this technology will play a key role in improving the way people get where they need to go while ensuring that the U.S. remains the leader in the global automotive industry."

The DOT and NHTSA have not yet set forth an exact date for when vehicles will be required to implement V2V technology. 

Source: U.S. Department of Transportation



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: This is a must
By Reclaimer77 on 2/4/2014 10:31:30 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
We don't live in a world where you can count on anywhere close to a majority of the people on the road being skilled drivers in well maintained vehicles.


Uhhh the statistics say we DO live in that world.

By your logic everyone totals their cars out every year playing bumper cars.

But yes, not everyone is a perfect driver. So freaking what? Do you believe the Government is going to swoop in and fix this for you? Or even if they could, should?

Why don't you fly over to Russia and pitch this crap to them? They might actually need it.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/...


RE: This is a must
By nafhan on 2/4/2014 2:51:12 PM , Rating: 2
Statistics you say... are these statistics that you made up, or are they ones you can refer me to? And, come on, there's a vast middle ground between perfect drivers and people who total their cars on a yearly basis.

Anyway, my point is that most people aren't that great at driving. Not that we should definitely implement this system as described here in this article (which I didn't say at all). I do, however, look forward to self driving cars getting "skilled" drivers off the road so I can commute in safety.


RE: This is a must
By Reclaimer77 on 2/4/2014 3:11:05 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah you're right, I made up those statistics. I write for the Washington Post, you got me.

f'ing douchebag....

I guess whenever we feel people are "bad" at something, we're justified in thinking the Government should swoop in and fix the situation.

Sorry Caucasians, mandatory dancing classes for you!!!


RE: This is a must
By Jeffk464 on 2/4/2014 5:21:54 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, find me a white guy that likes to dance


RE: This is a must
By nafhan on 2/5/2014 7:42:16 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Yeah you're right, I made up those statistics.
It was more like you made up the idea that those statistics exist somewhere, but yeah, basically.
quote:
f'ing douchebag
Making stuff up. Misrepresenting what others say. Now, name calling. Who's the d-bag?
quote:
I guess whenever we feel people are "bad" at something, we're justified in thinking the Government should swoop in and fix the situation.
You said this, not me. The entire time, I've been attempting to debunk the (very) mistaken idea that most people on the road are excellent drivers. If you want to argue against gov. control (or anything), use facts not things like supposed statistics that must exist because they would prop up your view of the world. There's plenty of reasons why the government shouldn't do this. "Everyone is a really good driver! FOR REAL!" isn't one of those reasons.


RE: This is a must
By Reclaimer77 on 2/5/2014 9:44:33 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
It was more like you made up the idea that those statistics exist somewhere, but yeah, basically.


Are you a troll? Of course those statistics are tracked and made available. Accident rates, fatalities, injuries, you name it. Tracked, collated, and categorized. Wtf, you can't be serious.

quote:
There's plenty of reasons why the government shouldn't do this. "Everyone is a really good driver! FOR REAL!" isn't one of those reasons.


I don't recall ever making that point. I don't think everyone is a really good driver, however I don't think we're living in a vehicle apocalypse as some are making it seem to be.

The statistics, that you refuse to acknowledge, show our roads are safer than ever and getting safer all the time. Everyone isn't a great driver, nor is everyone a horrible one as some make them out to be.


RE: This is a must
By nafhan on 2/5/2014 10:48:54 AM , Rating: 2
I've never seen statistics for things like "skill level of most drivers", and if such things exist, it's not coming from traffic accident info.

Anwyay:
quote:
Everyone isn't a great driver, nor is everyone a horrible one as some make them out to be.
If you believe that, why are you arguing with me? I jumped into this conversation by replying to someone who was stating that a skilled driver in a well maintained vehicle will be perfectly safe.


"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki