Print 57 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Feb 3 at 5:22 PM

The Nest team will stay intact

Google bought Nest Labs earlier this month for a solid $3.2 billion in cash and according to a new report from TechCrunch, Google's new Nest team will be the search giant's core hardware group. That means Nest won't just be used for home automation and energy monitoring -- the team will be in charge of Google's latest hardware, which could include smartphones and tablets for Google's Android mobile operating system.
Google will keep the Nest team intact, including Nest CEO Tony Fadell. Fadell, who used to work for Apple on the iPod as well as the iPhone development teams, is considered a top dog when it comes to hardware -- but he's also comfortable with software. 
TechCrunch said Google was looking for the right product designers and engineers who could cross between both hardware and software, and saw that in Nest. 

[SOURCE: Digital Trends]

While Google will likely have its new hardware team work on home-automated devices as well, many reports say the Nest guys will take over all hardware projects spanning many kinds of devices. It's currently unclear what those devices will be.
It's interesting to see that Google sold off Motorola Mobility the same month that it acquired Nest. Many have concluded that Google originally acquired Motorola with the same intentions as when it acquired Nest; to have an innovative hardware team to power Android devices and beyond.
Google ended up selling Motorola to Lenovo for $2.91 billion earlier this week, reportedly taking a $7 billion net loss on the company. 
But Google got to hold onto Motorola's patents, which is likely what it acquired the company for anyway. Now, armed with patents and a whole new hardware team, we'll have to wait and see what Google does next. 
Google just posted its Q4 2013 financials, posting a significant rise in revenue from $14.42 billion USD in Q4 2012 to $16.86 billion USD in Q4 2013. Analysts expected $16.75 billion USD. But net income (GAAP) was at $4.10 billion USD ($12.01 USD/share), which is up roughly 15 percent year-over-year, but represents 1.5 percent less than the $4.16 billion USD ($12.20 USD/share) than Thomson Reuters predicted. 

Source: TechCrunch

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: In-house ads
By Reclaimer77 on 2/1/2014 8:18:43 AM , Rating: 0
It isn't like you jump in every Google related article and tell people to "Shut up"

It's not like you jump into every Google related article and rehash the same old negative talking points and lies either.

At least I discuss other things like politics and vehicle technology. You appear to be 100% focused on Google! And you accuse me?

You know what's really rich about our little ballet? You're a hypocrite. You have a Windows Phone, which Microsoft uses to "invade your privacy" and sell your data to advertisers to target adds to you! Apparently it's fine when Microsoft does it. But Google? No, they're evil!

I wouldn't want anyone having access to my thermometer.

Then don't buy one. Problem solved!

I wouldn't want my energy use monitored with a government in place that believes in Man Made Global Warming and is willing to make aws based on that belief. You were against smart meters for the power grid when DT did articles about them. I guess because they were not made by Google, they were bad.

This is the second time you've claimed the Nest/Google team will be involved in Government monitoring and smart meters. Can you please prove this? At this point we have NO idea where Nest will go or what they'll be doing really.

This reeks of more pathetic Google fear-mongering and doom and gloom on your part. Google is NOT the NSA, get that through your skull!

You want examples of where people were actually hurt by Google? The authors who lost revenue when you could read almost the entire book on Google Books.

Oh wow, you're right. The apocalypse is upon us. That's the smoking gun right there, I rest my case.

Web scrapping has little to do with our discussion. I want you to prove that regular people using Google products are harmed by the anonymous gathering of data by Google. But you can't, because there isn't!

I understand you might have a problem with the principle behind Google's business model. But again, oops, YOU USE WINDOWS PHONE! So you must NOT have that big of an issue with this practice if you patronize it yourself.

Or you do something truly pathetic like trying to associate my dislike of Google with being a Nazi sympathizer

I can't believe you think that. That's just over the line, good god man, get some help. I have NEVER said or even implied such a thing.

RE: In-house ads
By troysavary on 2/1/14, Rating: 0
RE: In-house ads
By Reclaimer77 on 2/1/14, Rating: 0
RE: In-house ads
By Cheesew1z69 on 2/1/2014 5:28:43 PM , Rating: 1
Yes you fucking did you little spineless twat. Someone accused me of being a holocaust denier because he obviously misread what I posted, and you piled on, agreeing I must be and made a lame attempt to link it to my denial of reality everywhere else. Since the only disagreement I generally have with you is over Google, it was fucking obvious what you were linking it too. Do I need to go to the thread and quote you, you snivelling shit eater? If you are gonna have the gall to link me to something that reprehensible, at least don't fucking pretend that you never said it.
I hope they ban you, this was totally uncalled for.

RE: In-house ads
By Reclaimer77 on 2/1/2014 9:14:40 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know, it's kind of funny seeing someone totally lose their mind over nothing.

RE: In-house ads
By ven1ger on 2/3/2014 3:11:58 AM , Rating: 2
Do I know that MS uses my data. Yes, I do. Do I like it? Not really. But our data is not MS primary product, so I trust them more with it than I do Google.

Sorry, but this got me to wonder about something. I think I'd trust a company more if data is their primary product because they'd handle it a lot better than a company that data isn't their primary product. Would I trust my money in a bank if handling money wasn't their primary product? Would I entrust security to a company that security wasn't their primary function? Giving a pass to MS with regards to your data because data isn't their primary function seems kind of misplaced to me.

RE: In-house ads
By Reclaimer77 on 2/3/2014 11:39:13 AM , Rating: 2
I exposed him as a hypocrite, so he had to come up with some BS.

I guess he lets his next door neighbor hold all his money for him too. That's a banks primary product, so you know, you can't trust them as much...

RE: In-house ads
By NellyFromMA on 2/3/2014 12:41:58 PM , Rating: 2
Well, there is a key difference.

Google monetizes its users by collecting massive amounts of subtle data from a large variety of input sources and aggregates those results across one another to determine your psychological / retail profile. They don't actually value PROTECTING your data so much as they value USING it.

Microsoft markets itself a secure-services solution so, yes, they are more security-oriented. They also make very little on ad-revenue and there data collection and aggregation is typically opt-in as opposed to opt-out. So, MS has certainly positioned itself to not completely cede that avenue of revenue but also seemingly has realized it can't both collect swaths of personal data such as Google while also marketing secure-services. There is no future for MS continued success on ad-revenue alone so expect them to continue to opt for privacy for paid services.

RE: In-house ads
By Reclaimer77 on 2/3/2014 5:22:59 PM , Rating: 2
On what planet do the words Microsoft and security go together that solidly?

Anyway we're getting off point. He's a hypocrite and his reasoning why he's okay with MS selling his data and not Google was concocted bulls#it.

I admit I hate Apple freely and openly. If he just grew a spine and admitted he plain hates Google, I could respect that.

"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki