backtop


Print 64 comment(s) - last by eBob.. on Jan 24 at 9:54 AM

Google Glass ticket tossed due to lack of evidence

At times new technology not only creates a rush of similar products, but it can cause issues for the early adopters. Just look at the confusion among some businesses and even local authorities having to do with the Google Glass wearable computing device. One restaurant in Seattle has already banned people from wearing Google Glass devices inside and makes no apologies for doing so.
 
A woman in California was issued a traffic citation while driving and wearing her Google glass device back in October. The woman was initially pulled over for speeding and was then issued a ticket for using a “visual monitor” in her car while driving.
 
The highway patrol officer said that wearing Google Glass was a violation of state law, but the woman vowed to fight that ticket and took it to court. A San Diego court commissioner dismissed the ticker this Thursday after it was found that the officer had no proof that the device was operating at the time she was pulled over.

 
"There is no testimony it was operating or in use while Ms. Abadie was driving," the commission stated during the hearing.
 
Another reason for the dismissal is that an expert didn’t appear to testify that the device had been calibrated.
 
The officer who issued the ticket for speeding and for wearing Google Glass noted that he initially wasn’t going to cite the driver for wearing the glasses, however, he noted, "She got a little argumentative about whether or not it was legal for her to wear them."

Source: Reuters



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By ritualm on 1/17/2014 8:08:13 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
You are just proving my point further

Nah, you didn't have a point.
quote:
if people can be unsafe drivers when not distracted imagine how bad they can be when they are distracted

Unsafe? Says who, you?

Your arguments have more holes than an Intel CPU socket, as vividly illustrated by the following:
quote:
Yes all of those things are also distractions

So why do you want Glass banned, but not every other activity that can also cause distractions?
quote:
but Glass is much more distracting as it requires you to take your vision and attention off of the road in order to use the visual navigation

Wrong. Some states have done much worse.

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=33275...
quote:
There are gray areas in the law because the law says your hands must always be on the wheel yet people let go in order to drink coffee or smoke a cig which I have never heard anyone getting ticket for, but I have heard of people putting on makeup and eating in the car and getting tickets.

In other words, the law has no teeth because it isn't being consistently enforced. How does this help in getting Glass banned? Oh right, it won't work. With the current design, you cannot even tell the driver is using it, as opposed to merely wearing it.

Therefore, your arguments amount to "we must ban Glass just because they can cause distractions!" Your argument is unfounded and without merit.
quote:
What are you rambling about!?!

You're not the one who keeps a level and calm head here. You told me to kill myself, just because I wholeheartedly disagreed with your points. Not a wise move by yours truly.


"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki