backtop


Print 27 comment(s) - last by Perry Tanko.. on Jan 19 at 4:47 PM

NSA entered into a $10 million contract with RSA to place a flawed formula within encryption software

Security industry leader RSA was caught working with the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), and now it's seeing some backlash from former allies. 
 
According to a new report from CNET, some leaders in the computer security world who were scheduled to speak at the RSA Conference next month have backed out due to recent discoveries about the RSA's connections with the NSA.
 
The report said Mikko Hypponen, chief technology officer of F-Secure; Josh Thomas, the Chief Breaking Officer at security firm Atredis, and Jeffrey Carr, another security industry veteran who analyzes espionage and cyber warfare methods, have all canceled their presentations at the RSA Conference.
 
Carr and Hypponen have taken it a step further by boycotting the conference. Hypponen said "nationality" was the reason for his cancellation while Carr said the RSA had violated its customers' trust. 
 
"I don't want to send mixed messages, so I have canceled all my appearances at RSA 2014," said Hypponen.
 
Once Carr announced his boycott, others followed, including Marcia Hoffman, privacy attorney and former Electronic Frontier Foundation lawyer; Alex Fowler, Mozilla privacy and public policy expert; Christopher Soghoian, American Civil Liberties Union advocate and privacy expert; Adam Langley, Google security expert, and Chris Palmer, Google Chrome security engineer. 
 
The RSA Conference is scheduled for next month in San Francisco.


Jeffrey Carr [SOURCE: jeffreycarr.blogspot.com]

According to documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, the NSA entered into a $10 million contract with RSA to place a flawed formula within encryption software (which is widely used in personal computers and other products) to obtain "back door" access to data. The RSA software that contained the flawed formula was called Bsafe, which was meant to increase security in computers. The formula was an algorithm called Dual Elliptic Curve, and it was created within the NSA. RSA started using it in 2004 even before the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) approved it. 
 
RSA said it had no idea that the algorithm was flawed, or that it gave the NSA back door access to countless computers and devices. The NSA reportedly sold the algorithm as an enhancement to security without letting the RSA in on its real intentions. 
 
"Recent press coverage has asserted that RSA entered into a 'secret contract' with the NSA to incorporate a known flawed random number generator into its BSAFE encryption libraries.  We categorically deny this allegation," said RSA in a blog post.
 
Many in the security community were surprised at RSA's entanglement with the NSA, but the latest news of a $10 million contract as well has really shocked the industry.
 
RSA is known as a pioneer in the realm of computer security, and has notoriously fought off the NSA in previous attempts at breaking encryption in the 1990s. 
 
"I can't imagine a worse action, short of a company's CEO getting involved in child porn," said Carr. "I don't know what worse action a security company could take than to sell a product to a customer with a backdoor in it.”

Source: CNET



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Real Believable
By GulWestfale on 1/9/2014 6:47:32 PM , Rating: -1
yes, yes, i'm sure it's all true...
what's also funny is that two guys from google, probably the biggest abuser of data collection and privacy invasion, also cancelled their appearances. maybe they really think not being associated with RSA will make them look less like enthusiastic NSA collaborators??


RE: Real Believable
By ritualm on 1/9/2014 6:55:37 PM , Rating: 2
Perception is reality.

They don't want to get hit with an unwanted public image by remaining committed to the conference.


RE: Real Believable
By Reclaimer77 on 1/9/2014 7:10:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
probably the biggest abuser of data collection and privacy invasion


I really have a problem with ignorant populist hyperbole like this. In the literal sense, Google does not invade your privacy.

Also the big difference is that you can opt-out and not agree to the way Google does this. Obviously with this NSA backdoor nonsense, that's not an option.


RE: Real Believable
By JasonMick (blog) on 1/9/2014 7:24:12 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I really have a problem with ignorant populist hyperbole like this. In the literal sense, Google does not invade your privacy.
Well, it may invade your privacy but only if you're stupid, and its reach is limited.

I think the simple way to clarify this to people is to simply state this:

If Google did the things the NSA is doing, its employees would be sent to prison.

Google haters, I'm all for criticizing the company when it oversteps (e.g. with the Street View data collection), but if you're going to compare it to the NSA, give me some evidence that it's sabotaging your electronics with listening devices and installing rootkits/keyloggers/screengrabbers on your PC.

Because the NSA is doing all of those things.


RE: Real Believable
By Reclaimer77 on 1/9/2014 8:03:02 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
If Google did the things the NSA is doing, its employees would be sent to prison.


You really cut to the heart of the matter there, I couldn't agree more.


RE: Real Believable
By MrBlastman on 1/10/2014 10:18:16 AM , Rating: 3
If you work for the Government, you are immune to prosecution as long as you...

a. Pay off the right people
b. Suck off the right people
c. Your political party/supporter/individual remains in power
d. It is profitable for those in power

Once someone else steps in, watch out. You're on the block.

I'm sure Jefferson and Franklin would be rolling over in their graves if they saw all this.

There's a reason Federal power should be extremely limited. The NSA is a shining example, glistening on a tall pedestal, as to why.


RE: Real Believable
By JasonMick (blog) on 1/9/2014 7:20:14 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
what's also funny is that two guys from google, probably the biggest abuser of data collection and privacy invasion, also cancelled their appearances. maybe they really think not being associated with RSA will make them look less like enthusiastic NSA collaborators??
Yea except Google employees would be convicted of breaking the law and would be thrown in prison if they did the things the NSA is doing.

There's a huge leap between what Google is doing:
+ collecting data from a limited set of partner sites
+ mining data off open networks
+ scraping websites
+ using cookies to track browsing history in a course manner

...versus what the NSA is doing:
+ Collecting data ALL phone companies
+ Collecting emails snippets from ALL companies (except those that encrypt mail)
+ Cooperating with political suppression campaigns
+ auto-attacking peoples' computers with malware
+ having two whole factories devoted to sabotaging Americans' electronics with implanted surveillance devices
+ breaking into encrypted networks by paying for security flaws.

To give an analogy Google is like the person who finds a phone on the street and sells it. Is it taking advantage of the former owner's foolishness for profit? Sure.

But the NSA is like someone who smashes in your home windows and steals all the electronics out of your house. That's a much graver attack. Even those that have tried to intelligently secure themselves are vulnerable of becoming its victims.

Morally speaking, Google's actions may at times be considered questionable. But they're a far cry from the NSA's acts which are downright despicable.


RE: Real Believable
By GulWestfale on 1/9/2014 7:37:03 PM , Rating: 3
yes, the NSA is worse than google, but google has illegally collected data using its streetview cars. these cars were equipped to collect data from wifi networks, and obviously this equipment wasn't installed and set up to collect data by accident.

as far as the NSA is concerned, they would not be able to collect nearly as much data if corporations weren't cooperating with them, and were trying to uphold the law instead of helping them break it.


RE: Real Believable
By Reclaimer77 on 1/9/14, Rating: -1
RE: Real Believable
By GulWestfale on 1/10/2014 7:47:33 AM , Rating: 1
so the german government is bad for trying to protect its citizens, which is its job, as a government??


RE: Real Believable
By Reclaimer77 on 1/10/2014 9:07:26 AM , Rating: 2
What? I think you're getting way off the point here dude. I never said that, that's not even the issue.


RE: Real Believable
By ven1ger on 1/13/2014 3:02:22 PM , Rating: 2
The German government should have mandated that vendors/manufacturers who sell commercial routers to have them secured from initial setup. Did Google do anything with this illegal data that was being collected from unsecured routers? Did Google steal any of the bandwidth off these unsecured devices, or mine the data off of them? But, it's okay for the actual thieves that steal your info or utilize the bandwidth off these devices.

It's kind of stupid to broadcast yourself to the neighbor and not expect someone will be listening. If the German gov't really wanted to protect people's privacy, then they should penalize the companies that sell these routers unsecured, but then again, maybe the German gov't wants to be able to spy on their citizens.


RE: Real Believable
By boobo on 1/10/2014 12:48:51 AM , Rating: 2
If "corporations" refused to cooperate, their executives would be charged at best with contempt and at worst with treason.

They got orders from a secret court to help. The one guy who refused to cooperate had to close his business.


"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki