Print 6 comment(s) - last by Rott3nHIppi3.. on Jan 7 at 1:23 PM

Roku teamed up with TV manufacturers TCL and Hisense

A lot of smart TVs today are coupled with set-top boxes because they just don't seem as smart as they claim. But Roku has put a set-top box inside the TV with its latest offering.  

Roku has announced its own television called Roku TV, which is exactly what it sounds like: an HDTV with a Roku box built right inside. 

Roku teamed up with TV manufacturers TCL and Hisense to build a line of Roku TVs ranging from 32 inches to 55 inches. Of course, the Roku user interface is built into the TV for instant access to 31,000 movies and 1,200 apps (also called "channels"). 

The TVs also come with a newly-designed remote control, which features only 20 buttons (about half the buttons found on a traditional remote). This makes it a lot easier to use, as Roku only placed necessary and straightforward options on the device. 

According to Roku, it will be the one taking care of software updates on the Roku TVs, which means that all Roku TVs will receive them at the same time. It can be a pain when the updates are handled by the manufacturers, because that means some are being updated faster than others. 

Roku will, of course, still sell its set-top boxes alongside the new TVs. Just months ago, Roku announced a new family of streaming media players, including the Roku 1, Roku 2 and Roku 3. 

Source: Roku

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why?
By TheEquatorialSky on 1/6/2014 3:05:41 PM , Rating: 1
TVs should last 10+ years. There are no new compelling technologies that would encourage Joe Schmoe to upgrade his TV like the HD revolution.

3D? No.
4K? No.

While their boxes are popular, Roku is still a two-bit operation in the grand scheme of things. The chances of them going bankrupt, losing provider contracts or just changing the UI for the worse seems too high over a 10+ year period to justify vendor lock-in.

...and yes, I would buy a TV without a digital converter. A TV really only needs to be a display. I'd rather the money be spent improving *that* feature than on gimmicks...

RE: Why?
By Rott3nHIppi3 on 1/7/2014 1:23:12 PM , Rating: 3
I think you're missing the point. I didn't say this was an 'upgrade' option for people who already have kick-ass LED TVs. I said this was marketable to people... say .... single mom living in 2 bedroom apt with her 2 kids and already pays for internet service. As for the lack of 3D or OLED... I'd imagine this is to target lower income families who shop Walmart for deals.

As for 10 yr life... TVs are becoming as disposable as printers and phones. You must be a proud owner of many things you're unwilling to let go of!! LOL!

"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Related Articles

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki