backtop


Print 22 comment(s) - last by sorry dog.. on Dec 16 at 1:22 PM

The safety board hasn’t concluded what caused the crash

A recent hearing regarding the Asiana Airlines crash in San Francisco last July revealed that the pilot was unfamiliar with the plane's systems and wasn't prepared to handle it manually.
 
According to a new report from Bloomberg, a U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) hearing yesterday showed that the Asiana Airlines pilot from the July 6 crash disabled a speed-control system before the plane crashed at San Francisco International Airport (SFO). 
 
The pilot -- Lee Kang Kuk -- who was being trained on the Boeing 777-200ER wide-body, entered certain parameters into the flight-management and auto-throttle systems that day, leading the plane to believe he wanted to accelerate and climb. He then throttled back to counter the plane’s increase in thrust so that the plane’s descent could resume.
 
However, the throttles stayed in the lowest setting due to the way the auto-throttle had been set, and because he had shut off the autopilot.
 
Once the plane descended below 50 feet, the plane’s control column began shaking as a warning to pilots that they were losing lift. A series of chimes rang 11 seconds before impact, which indicate that the plane had reached dangerously low speed. A transcript showed that Lee Jung Min (an instructor pilot monitoring the captain as part of his training) gave the command to abort the landing and climb 8.5 seconds after the initial speed warning.


As it turns out, the pilots increased the power too late to avoid the crash.

Lee Kang Kuk said the experience was "very stressful" and "very difficult," and that he wasn’t used to landing without an instrument-landing system leading him to the runway. According to Lee, he thought the auto-throttle would have come out of the idle position to prevent the airplane from going below the minimum speed. 

The crash killed three teenage girls from China and over 200 passengers were taken to hospitals. There were 291 passengers, 12 flight attendants and four pilots. 

“Asiana is committed to taking necessary steps to ensure such an accident never happens again,” said Asiana Airlines in a statement.

The safety board hasn’t concluded what caused the crash.

However, a recent study commissioned by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) shows that pilots depend on automation much more than they should, and many don't know what to do when they must manually take over. 
 
"They [pilots] are accustomed to watching things happen…instead of being proactive," said the study.
 
The study was comprised of an international panel of air-safety experts comprising of industry, labor, academic and government officials.

Source: Bloomberg



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

should not have been flying
By ssobol on 12/12/2013 12:43:09 PM , Rating: 5
A pilot who freely admits that flying an approach in a perfectly functioning airplane on a fine weather day is "very difficult" and "very stressful" clearly is not up to the task and should not have been in that position.

Flying visual approaches is one of the most basic tasks pilots usually learn very early on in their careers.




RE: should not have been flying
By sorry dog on 12/12/2013 1:57:19 PM , Rating: 2
This coming out doesn't seem too surprising, and it's setting the stage for the NTSB final report to not only blame the lack of basic airmanship, but organizational failures. Like not allowing pilots to fly by hand, training program failures, and automation dependency.

There's too much of a trend going on to not address it.


RE: should not have been flying
By Keeir on 12/12/2013 2:42:26 PM , Rating: 2
Interesting. If you read the article, it comes across more as a lack of trust in the control systems of the plane.

"entered certain parameters into the flight-management and auto-throttle systems that day, leading the plane to believe he wanted to accelerate and climb. He then throttled back to counter the plane’s increase in thrust so that the plane’s descent could resume."

"A transcript showed that Lee Jung Min (an instructor pilot monitoring the captain as part of his training) gave the command to abort the landing and climb 8.5 seconds after the initial speed warning."

In both these situations, they ignored that the plane was telling them something was wrong.

In this situation, better training and awareness of the automation and warning sensors could have averted the crash. More "fly by hand" would not likely have fixed the issue alone.


RE: should not have been flying
By MozeeToby on 12/12/13, Rating: 0
RE: should not have been flying
By Chaser on 12/12/2013 10:57:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
In S. Korea, there are no private pilot licenses. There's too much concern that some idiot will either try to defect

South Koreans, don't do defections. You might want to have your head checked for reverse polar syndrome.


"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki