backtop


Print 59 comment(s) - last by powerwerds.. on Dec 17 at 6:34 PM

"It makes people funnier" is just one of the many benefits, apparently

China has had some serious issues with smog lately, to the point of closing schools and delaying or canceling flights. But the Chinese media has put quite a spin on these recent problems with pollution, insisting that there are five benefits to choking on the air you breathe. 

According to Yahoo News, China's state broadcaster CCTV attempted to shine some absurd light on the smog situation by listing five reasons as to why this air pollution is beneficial. The list is as follows:
  1. It unifies the Chinese people.
  2. It makes China more equal.
  3. It raises citizen awareness of the cost of China's economic development.
  4. It makes people funnier.
  5. It makes people more knowledgeable (of things like meteorology and the English word 'haze'). 
This list is one of the more imaginative spins seen on a poor situation. Not even former Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf can top this one.
 
China's smog problem has certainly escalated in recent weeks, and since the country is trying to make Shanghai in particular a hub for new business, this air pollution isn't doing it any favors. 
 
Last week, hundreds of flights were delayed or cancelled in Shanghai on Friday alone, citing record levels of air pollution. 
 
Schools were affected as well, as hazardous air pollution forced them to shut down or cancel outdoor activities in at least two cities in eastern China on Thursday. Some schools cancelled outdoor activities on Friday, too. 
 
The Shanghai government issued its most severe health warning last Friday afternoon when the city's pollution index ranged between 23 times and 31 times the levels recommended by international health officials.
 
The Shanghai government said the level of PM2.5 particulate matter reached 466 on Friday, which is categorized as "severely polluted." 


China's smog problem [Image Source: Sensible Reason]
 
PM2.5 particulate matter involves small particles in the air that are the most hazardous to health. 
 
The U.S. Consulate in Shanghai took a reading of a whopping 503. 
 
This is definitely not good news, as the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends no more than a reading of 20 as a daily level. Anything over 300 is labeled hazardous. 
 
The Chinese government has said that it would battle the smog problem, but its efforts don't appear to be working too well. 
 
In a recent Reuters report, the United States offered to help China crack down on vehicle emissions in order to combat the air pollution situation. More specifically, the U.S. said it would offer technical assistance to create a new round of vehicle emissions standards -- known as China VI -- which would require cars to have filters that capture particulate matter.
 
This could be a helpful step in fighting smog, considering the fact that China's Ministry of Public Security said passenger car ownership in China reached 120 million by the end of 2012, and will top 200 million by 2020 at the current growth rate.
 
However, China V standards for diesel and refined gasoline will be the next to be introduced, and they will not take effect until 2017. But the good news is that the standards will lower the sulfur content limit to 10 parts per million.
 
The most recent reports on Chinese air pollution are certainly not the first. Back in July of this year, a study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology reported that heavy pollution in northern China causes citizens in that area to have lower lifespans than those in the south. In fact, the study says that the 500 million people who live north of the Huai River will lose 2.5 billion years of life expectancy because of air pollution. Breaking it down further, each northerner has a 5.5-year drop in life expectancy compared to southerners. 
 
Way back in 2008, a NASA study said 15 percent of America's air pollution is from Asia. A year before that, China became the world's top CO2 emitter

Sources: Yahoo News, Time Magazine



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Caption fix
By powerwerds on 12/17/2013 6:34:57 PM , Rating: 2
I feel ya whole-heartedly on most of your points. A few, however, lack sense.

Printing money is the Federal Reserve's job. They help balance the worth of the dollar both to its previous self (inflation) and to other currencies in a dynamic, unpredictable landscape. When they print money they aren't increasing their wealth. The entirety of American dollars is worth something, and printing more dollars doesn't make the worth of the entirety go up, it makes the worth of each individual dollar go down.

Many Americans do receive multi-billion dollar payouts because they can't pay their rent. Its a cornerstone of the ridiculous amount of money we spend on social services. The reason they can't pay their rent is because the won't. And the reason they won't pay their rent is because they know the government will help pay it for them. Yes, greed, debt, something for nothing, and stealing from the rich to give to the poor are very scary reasons America needs to wake up.

It is perfectly reasonable to genetically modify food. I know this might sound spooky and ccrrraazzy, but humans have been directly genetically modifying their food supply since they first became a part of the chain. It began with the ignorant pressures of hunter-gatherers on their local flora and fauna. This lasted for many thousands of years and had sweeping changes on the genotypes of the consumables.

This transitioned into the cognizance of a generational affectation through animal husbandry and a seasonal affectation on agriculture. Human selection over time yielded quite extreme genetic changes from the parent original.

And now we are at the point where we aren't just molding clay anymore, we are building bricks, and architecting an infinity stymied only by our menial imagination of what we can currently fathom of the incredible wonder of that which is LIFE. Whatever we make still has to compete and be viable, it doesn't exist outside the fierce competition for resources and life in a soil microcosm. It is all evolution, and I am hardly afraid of a rogue "genetically modified" organism ruining an entire ecosystem.

The danger is people who want something for nothing. People who feel entitled to things such as a house, food, or healthcare, or anything for that matter, in the sense that they deserve to have such and such things that someone else would need to produce just because they simply happen to be alive. This process of the haves supporting or carrying the have-nots is mind blowing to me. How can that ever EVER lead to anyone having anything at all?


"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki