Report: Windows Phone, Windows RT May be Offered Free to OEMs
December 12, 2013 2:31 PM
comment(s) - last by
Thanks to Microsoft, Apple, Nokia lawsuit/licensing triple team, OEMs might be tempted to take the deal
"sources familiar with Microsoft's plan" as saying that
Windows Executive Vice President (EVP) Terry Myerson
is considering offering Windows RT and Windows Phone for free. The move could be a game changer for Microsoft, which is struggling in key mobile markets including budget laptops, tablets, and smartphones.
I. Free at Last?
Some viewed Microsoft's decision to
offer free upgrades to Windows 8.1
for Windows 8 users as a shift in direction; others argued that the release was analogous to a service pack, which Microsoft has traditionally released for free.
Needless to say, offering an operating system to OEMs for free would be a far greater seismic shift for Microsoft. The "official" MSRP is $120 USD for Windows RT, but the rates that Microsoft sells it to OEMs at are individually negotiated. According to
in mid-2012 Microsoft was asking $80-95 USD per license (with the median asking price around $85 USD) for Windows RT tablets. Following poor pickup of Windows RT, Microsoft reportedly
cut licensing fees
to $30-45 USD by June 2013, according to reports by
The Wall Street Journal
Microsoft current charges anywhere from $5 to $30 USD per Windows Phone license.
In Jan. 2012,
Chinese phonemaker ZTE
in an interview with
(UK) that Microsoft was charging between $20 and 30 USD per Windows Phone 8 license. Larger OEMs have been rumored to get more favorable deals;
in June 2011 that Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) (the world's biggest smartphone maker) was paying only $10 USD per Windows Phone license.
Aside from ZTE's apparent tip, the closest to confirmed licensing rate info we have on Windows Phone comes from financial filings from Finnish phonemaker (and Windows Phone maker) Nokia Oyj. (
). While there was a two-way flow of money between Microsoft and Nokia (Microsoft paid Nokia around $1B USD to use Windows Phone over Android), the net direction of the flow was to Microsoft.
Windows EVP Terry Myerson is considering free licensing to consumers to drive sales of mobile Windows product.
A 20-F filing
by Nokia for fiscal 2012 revealed that Nokia was expected to pay Microsoft €500M ($688M USD) more than it received
through the end of 2016
. Given that Nokia shipped
7m Windows Phones in Q1 2013
7.4m in Q2
8.8m in Q3
, that works out to something in the neighborhood of 32-35m expected sales for 2013. Assuming no growth (an unrealistic assumption, as Nokia doubled its Windows Phone sales from 2012 to 2013), sales should work out to 125 - 150 million units through 2016. That's about $5 a license -- at most -- likely even less (of course, Nokia's devices unit later would be
sold to Microsoft scrapping that deal
But in October the rumor mill was buzzing following a
that Microsoft offered HTC Corp. (
free Windows phone licenses
, if it commits to a large volume of handsets (perhaps exclusivity).
II. Why "Free" is Good for Microsoft's Bottom Line
In Q3 market analysis form Interactive Data Corp. (
) indicated sales of 8.9m Windows Phone units (indicating Nokia accounted for basically all of the platform's sales). Windows RT -- the version of PC Windows that runs on CPUs bearing ARM Holdings plc's (
) titular licensed architecture -- moved 200,000 units in Q2 2013 (about half a percent of the 51m+ tablets that were sold in Q2). It's safe to assume that Q3 sales were bad or worse, given that
bailed on Windows RT
with the launch of Intel Corp.'s (
Windows RT sales are basically nonexistent. [Image Source: TalkVietnam]
So Microsoft’s net loss in revenue had it offered Windows Phone and Windows RT for free to OEMs would have been around $50M USD -- a drop in the bucket for a company that made
$5.24B USD last quarter
in net income.
As the fall of RIM/BlackBerry demonstrated, it's absolutely vital to stay relevant in the mobile consumer market, in order to stay relevant in the enterprise market. So it's a smart move for Microsoft to sacrifice roughly 1 percent of its net earnings if that expenditure will gain it ground in the mobile market.
That brings us to a final point -- will it work?
III. Will OEMs Quit Android to Save Money?
Currently there's only one major alternative to the Windows OS family in terms of a third party platform -- Google Inc.'s (
) Android OS. Likewise on budget laptops the only widely adopted alternative is Chrome OS. Chrome OS and Android are "free" to OEMs in the sense that Google doesn't collect license fees and offers to share advertising revenue with the OEMs. However, these operating systems aren't truly free in the long run.
Microsoft has already
scored licensing agreements
from most Android OEMs, which typically fall in the $5-15 USD range. Apple, Inc. (
) seems to
prefer to simply exclude competitors
from the market, but it too
will license in some cases
(e.g. HTC). Either way this is yet
another cost that is borne by your device sales
. Lastly, there's Nokia, who arguably has the strongest patent portfolio in the industry. Nokia is
trying to squeeze
a third licensing fee
The Innovation Act does offer some positive patent reform. [Image Source: InvestorsEye]
The question is whether a free Windows OS would be cheaper. You know with certainty that Microsoft won’t sue you, so that reduces your potential licensing fees to payments/lawsuits costs with Apple and Nokia. Further, you're safe from most software patents, as Apple and Nokia have committed to licensing agreements with Microsoft.
Thus the only expense you have is potential payments on hardware infringements or infringements on design patents. As the Nokia v. HTC conflict shows, this can still be an issue -- particularly if you buy your chips in jurisdictions where licensing deals from chipmakers don't transfer to their customers (e.g. Taiwan). However, even if Windows Phone/Windows RT OEMs are forced into small licensing fees regarding hardware patents or small redesigns to escape design infringement claims, this still will likely be half what a top Android OEM today is paying.
The Nokia, Microsoft, and Apple patent licensing/lawsuit triple team may make the "free" Windows Phone the only financially feasible option for some OEMs, like HTC. [Image Source: NeoWin]
If Chrome OS
continues to see sales success
, expect at least Microsoft to start to demand similar fees from device makers.
H.R. 3309 Innovation Act of 2013
the "Innovation Act of 2013"
-- makes it through the Senate and is signed into law, that scenario could tilt even further in Microsoft favor, as it could intercede and take over some patent disputes.
Simply put together Microsoft, Apple, and Nokia are triple teaming phonemakers. This approach may eventually make getting the licenses necessary to sell a smartphone or tablet so expensive that Android becomes financially infeasible for top OEMs. And now Microsoft deftly maneuvering to position itself as a seeming knight in shining armor, and offering "free" licensing -- if you use its OS.
Smaller Android OEMs who might be under less legal pressure invariably will have to weigh these financial benefits against the cost of redesigning for a new operating system and the cost to users of having a more limited app selection.
But overall free licensing could be a game changer to Microsoft's mobile campaign, and help Microsoft sustain profits in the long term in the enterprise sector, which current drives most of its revenue.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
12/14/2013 8:33:16 PM
Not sure why you keep harping about chromebooks. Attempting to derail the topic doesn't change the fact that Microsoft has one sore ass from all of the vendors that had licensed their software jumping ship when they bought Nokia's hardware div.
Are they butthurt?
They sure are by posting a video that compares a network appliance with a full blow laptop computer when anybody with half a brain knows they are not the same thing. Is ChromeOS a stand-alone operating system. No. So frigging what?
Why are they butthurt?
They are sitting in 3rd place in the most lucrative mobile device market. Apple and Google's hardware partners are all taking turns raping them in mobile sales. They are so butthurt they have to try and lure in hardware vendors with free Windows licenses. And we all know what happens to free Microsoft licenses when the next release comes out don't we ;)
Why should Google have a sore rump for giving away Android?
Android is and always has been OPEN SOURCE
. Just like LINUX. They have more vendors using their ALWAYS FREELY AVAILABLE software than any other MOBILE OPERATING SYSTEM vendor in the world. About the last thing anybody can call Google is butthurt.
Does that make Microsoft's backside just a teensy bit sore? I'm sure it does.
12/14/2013 9:51:41 PM
Chromebooks were brought up by another post way up the thread, not by me. And Google is not marketing Chromebooks as a network appliance, they are marketing them as a computer. The aim is to compete with Windows. From Google's website
"The Chromebook Family. Starting at $199. A new type of computer with everything built-in." ChromeOS is competing with Windows, is MS not supposed to respond?
I did not call Google butthurt, I happen to think their business model is genius. However, I don't think MS is butthurt either (and that is the absolute last time I will type that word), they are adjusting their business model because it is not working. Something Google has also done often.
No, tell me what happens to free Microsoft licenses when the next release comes out since I don't recall MS ever offering free OS licenses. Are you telling me that if Samsung signs on to make more Windows phones they are not smart enough to craft a contract that protects their investment?
I don't understand the need to personalize business decisions. If MS changes its strategy to offering free OS licenses it won't be because it is angry, it will be because it thinks it can make more money that way.
"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings
Houses Passes "Anti-Troll" Innovation Act With Pro-Apple, Microsoft Edits
December 9, 2013, 8:55 PM
Crushing UK Verdict Could Force HTC to Pay Nokia a Fee on Every Device
December 4, 2013, 10:00 PM
Fed Up With Cheating OEMs, Microsoft Trolls Chromebooks in New Ad
November 27, 2013, 4:09 PM
Samsung and Nokia Sign 5 Year Licensing Deal, Despite Leaks Controversy
November 4, 2013, 1:41 PM
Nokia Sells 8.8 Million Windows Phones in Q3, Transitions to Telecom Sales
October 29, 2013, 8:11 PM
Report: Microsoft's Chinese Offices Raided
July 28, 2014, 9:16 PM
Cell Phone Unlocking Bill Heads to President Obama's Desk
July 28, 2014, 11:58 AM
T-Mobile CEO John Legere is on the Warpath Again; Introduces $100, 10GB Family Plan
July 28, 2014, 10:12 AM
Report: All 15" MacBook Pros to Receive 16GB RAM Standard Starting Tomorrow
July 28, 2014, 8:12 AM
Sony's Xperia Z3 Gets Detailed in Leaked Photos
July 25, 2014, 2:30 PM
Heavy Users of Verizon’s “Unlimited” LTE Data Could Soon See Targeted Throttling
July 25, 2014, 1:52 PM
Most Popular Articles
Ford Details ’15 F-150’s 325hp, 2.7L EcoBoost V6; Demonstrates 732-lb Weight Loss
July 22, 2014, 6:55 PM
Comcast Memo: Harassing Customers During Retention Calls Actually IS Our Policy
July 22, 2014, 5:19 PM
Kindle Fire Phone Review Roundup -- A Solid "Meh"
July 23, 2014, 2:09 PM
Windows 9 Will Merge Windows, Windows Phone, Windows RT in 2015
July 23, 2014, 3:33 PM
Russia Looks to Counter U.S. Sanctions With Bill Targeting American Tech Firms
July 22, 2014, 3:49 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information