Print 50 comment(s) - last by retrospooty.. on Dec 6 at 7:09 AM

Sony says the PS4 is selling well

Sony says that it has sold 2.1 million PS4 consoles as of December 1. Sony also notes that PS4 owners are taking advantage of the social features of the new console, and that over 6.5 million shares have been captured using the Share button on the PS4 controller.
"PS4 delivered the best launch in PlayStation history with the North American release and we've continued this incredibly successful start in Europe, Australasia and Latin America," said Andrew House, President and Group CEO, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. 

"Demand remains incredibly strong and continues to overwhelm the supply worldwide, but we are diligently working to meet those growing demands and to deliver additional PS4 units to our retail partners throughout the holiday season."
Sony officially announced the PS4 console in June. The PS4 launched on November 15 in the U.S. and Canada, but the console has been in limited supply and some of the early units had an issue dubbed the "blue light of death."
On November 29, the console was made available in Europe, Australia, and Latin America. As of now, the PS4 is available in 32 countries around the world.

Source: Twitter

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: competition = good
By Reclaimer77 on 12/3/2013 8:14:39 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah lol. Last of Us is SO bad. You aren't playing a game, you're watching a movie. And the gameplay mechanics, for a game so highly rated, are surprisingly lacking.

I think the reviewers are suffering from Avatar syndrome. Caught up in the visuals and splendor, and giving all the truly shi%^y stuff a pass.

RE: competition = good
By retrospooty on 12/3/2013 9:44:11 PM , Rating: 1
LOL... I know. I haven't played Last of us, but I did check out some of the other games Takin was going on about. FTL and Frozen Synapse are quite simply 2 of the lamest games I have ever been recomended to try. Not just boring, they were excruciating. These are a few of his examples of how apps are better on IOS. ROFL. It makes sense now, the guy just has no taste. Factor in the total lack of taste and his posts all make sense now.

RE: competition = good
By nikon133 on 12/3/2013 9:53:49 PM , Rating: 2
I have a strong feel Reclaimer hasn't played it either...

RE: competition = good
By Reclaimer77 on 12/3/2013 10:10:53 PM , Rating: 2
I played it at a friends house. Is that okay with you?

My friend thought it sucked too lol.

RE: competition = good
By nikon133 on 12/4/2013 10:43:41 PM , Rating: 3
Everything is OK with me, everyone is entitled to opinion. You only sound like you TRIED it, not really PLAYED it. Games with strong storytelling usually don't make proper impression for a short stints.

Yes it does have fair amount of cut scenes, but I found action quite good. Atmosphere is also great, strong feel of vulnerability, good dialogues and voice acting... for a game. Heck, for most blockbuster movies as well, really. All my friends who own PS3 and played through game, loved it.

RE: competition = good
By TakinYourPoints on 12/3/2013 11:12:01 PM , Rating: 1
You should play TLOU, its great.

As for FTL and Frozen Synapse, they're also great, and it isn't just me.

They might not be your thing but they're excellent games in the roguelike and strategy genres. They are very challenging though, especially FTL. Amazing soundtracks too. If you don't want a challenge of any sort then I can see how they aren't up your alley.

These are a few of his examples of how apps are better on IOS.

I was playing those games on PC well over a year before the ports were announced. I wasn't cherry picking them as iOS examples either, there are countless other games exclusive to it as well. Those two just happen to be great PC games I'm a fan of that can also work well with a touchscreen. I hate shooters and tech demos like Infinity Blade on touchscreen, great as they may look. The gameplay isn't my thing. I think tactics games, board/card games, and strategy games are perfect for touch though. I have no problem recommending those to anyone, while the other stuff flashy depends on if you are a graphics nut or not.

XCom Enemy Unknown manages all of these: good graphics, 100% faithful port from PC version, and great tactics gameplay.

Again, no cherry picking, its just that unless we're talking about Zynga and Rovio, what Android lacks in games is so incredibly wide that its actually really hard to miss with that sort of thing. Stuff like Blizzard putting off an Android port of Hearthstone for over a year isn't something I just made up, its just one of those things that consistently happens.

Its like talking about third party games on the Wii. Its just way more likely that something like GTA won't be on it while its on the XBox and Playstation, you know?

RE: competition = good
By TakinYourPoints on 12/5/2013 2:15:44 AM , Rating: 1
And because you guys dragged mobile app libraries when I was talking about PC gaming vs consoles, here's a great app my digital imaging tech and I used on set today:

Yes, I know, it doesn't matter how many games I bring up, how many specialized apps for medical/aviation/filmmaking I link, numerous quality apps like Alien Blue, no, there actually is no difference in depth or quality between iOS and Android mobile ecosystems, and if there is then it doesn't actually matter.

Because card slots. ;)

RE: competition = good
By retrospooty on 12/5/2013 7:33:13 AM , Rating: 2
"it doesn't matter how many games I bring up, how many specialized apps for medical/aviation/filmmaking I link, numerous quality apps like Alien Blue, no, there actually is no difference in depth or quality between iOS and Android mobile ecosystems"

Correct, but not for the reason you meantioned. It doesnt matter becasue we now know 2 things.

1. You have lousy taste in apps.
2. You dont know what is available on Android.

The truth is its really close. Not a distant second. IOS at this point still has a slight edge. 9 on a 10 scale while Android is an 8.

RE: competition = good
By TakinYourPoints on 12/5/2013 11:27:23 AM , Rating: 2
Lousy taste because you say so? Haha, ok.

FS and FTL are two of the best PC strategy games and roguelikes in years. Super fun gameplay, awards like crazy, rabid fanbase, and Android users clamoring for them.

I can't help it if they're too hard for you or if you need a lot of hand holding in your games.

I also don't need to own a Wii to know that its missing most of what other platforms have. Same situation here. I see this kind of post on gaming sites every day, even among Android fans:

These aren't indies that are being missed out on either, these are flagship games by the biggest companies in the industry. But who cares about 2K and Blizzard, right?

RE: competition = good
By retrospooty on 12/5/2013 6:52:11 PM , Rating: 2
"Lousy taste because you say so? Haha, ok"

But that is the exact same logic you use for games and apps that you like. I agree, ridiculous. Mine was mockingly sarcastic though, yours is real. We have all come to the realization that when you say "better" it means absolutely nothing other than "better to Taken" and your points should be taken with huge lumps of salt.

RE: competition = good
By TakinYourPoints on 12/6/2013 3:13:50 AM , Rating: 2
Nah, if someone like BF4 or something then more power to them, it just isn't for me. That's totally cool, I think its boring but I prefer harder games like Starcraft/DOTA and old-school style FPS like Quake. Again, that's just me.

If I talk about something more objectively measurable, something like color gamut, gamma curve, accuracy, software libraries, or performance benchmarks, then it is much much easier to make more solid statements like that.

Better is better.

After that its all about explaining why the drawbacks of something inferior are acceptable (ie - I can't afford more horsepower in my budget, my lighting conditions don't allow for a better display, I prefer hardware flexibility over horsepower and software ecosystem, etc). That doesn't automatically make the alternative better, its just better given self-imposed constraints and preferences.

I understand both sides. Its when someone (like most active posters here) insists that their way is the ONLY way and everyone else is an idiot that it gets ridiculous.

RE: competition = good
By retrospooty on 12/6/2013 7:09:43 AM , Rating: 2
I totally agree with you here... It's just that this post conflicts with most of your other posts.

RE: competition = good
By TakinYourPoints on 12/3/2013 10:52:28 PM , Rating: 3
I'm generally all about mechanics in games. That's why my most played games are ones like Starcraft, DOTA, Quake 3/Live, Street Fighter, etc. Mechanically challenging, highly competitive, but fun. I hate most modern shooters because they've done mechanics so badly. My rig can play BF4 60fps on ultra at 1440p, no problem, and I feel like I wasted my money on the game. So boring.

I also hate most on-rails games. Naughty Dog got away with it for me with Uncharted 2 and TLOU. The stories are so good that they kept me drawn in. TLOU started off ok but by the Winter chapter it was impossible to put down. Going in between characters the way that it did was genius. The sneaking mechanics worked within the story. If you're so bad that its hard then I can understand it being frustrating. The ending is also one of the best I've seen in any medium this year, film and TV included. I think that and the Breaking Bad finale were up there.

By the way, your criticisms 1000% apply to Bioshock Infinite. Terrible gameplay, awful shooting mechanics, no meaningful choices, terrible plot driven story that is at the expense of character, and an ending that makes the most ludicrous M Night Shyalaman twist look good. Its just a terrible game that gets worse the more time you have away from it.

There's no waiting for the backlash there either, it started months ago. TLOU is only gaining in esteem as time goes on, and Naughty Dog's next game is going to be very highly anticipated.

RE: competition = good
By cyberserf on 12/4/2013 1:35:38 AM , Rating: 2
Competition really is an good thing. look how those fools at MS turned around their decision quick after an uproar to add always on internet/kinect always on and no used games.

Now look at the PC industry where there is no competition for Windows so we have W8 and no matter how much people complain MS just does not care since we don't really have any alternatives.

RE: competition = good
By HostileEffect on 12/4/2013 2:03:26 AM , Rating: 2
Linux, xsos, react os, older versions of windows with mods... ehh.. some others

RE: competition = good
By xti on 12/4/2013 11:50:46 AM , Rating: 2

at least not for gaming.

RE: competition = good
By Spuke on 12/4/2013 2:11:15 PM , Rating: 2

BF4 is boring?? Really? I guess getting spawn trolled all the time would make me disheartened too. Actually, I think I have a set of your tags.

RE: competition = good
By Digimonkey on 12/4/2013 2:43:16 PM , Rating: 2
He also said BioShock Infinite had awful shooting mechanics. I'd assume that he's just really bad at FPS games.

RE: competition = good
By Spuke on 12/4/2013 3:05:00 PM , Rating: 2
He also said BioShock Infinite had awful shooting mechanics. I'd assume that he's just really bad at FPS games.
LOL! Yeah, he must suck.

RE: competition = good
By TakinYourPoints on 12/5/2013 2:32:22 AM , Rating: 2
My railgun and rocket launcher accuracy says no. :)

Sorry dude, B:I had that awful Unreal Engine 3 feel to it. There was little meaningful difference between a bunch of awful feeling guns with no oomph, and there was no real hard decision to make between leveling up your skills since you could get your vigors all up to a decent place anyway.

Bioshock Infinite is an easy, boring game that takes absolutely zero skill and gives you no tough choices. Ken Levine peaked with System Shock 2, that game had great atmosphere that forced HARD decisions up the skill trees. No backtracking and there were big pluses and minuses with each decision. Bioshock was passable (awful last quarter) and B:I was overrated trash.

Its no big deal if you like it though. Lots of people like you enjoy easy on-rails games.

RE: competition = good
By TakinYourPoints on 12/5/2013 2:24:32 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah, it sucks. The last fun Battlefield game was BF2, I think because of the novelty at the time. 1942 was the peak because of its awesome vehicle physics. I could play Market Garden and Wake Island all day. Modern realistic shooters are super boring and require no skill. Snipe snipe snipe, shotgun shotgun, get kills in a tank.


Keep your baby shooters. Give me a real skill FPS like Quake 3 any day.

RE: competition = good
By TakinYourPoints on 12/5/2013 2:20:59 AM , Rating: 2
I think Valve has a shot at making Linux a viable alternative.

Yes, this will take time. Steam took time. I had it since early beta when it was just a patcher for CS 1.6, and it wasn't very good. The Half Life 2 launch was a disaster from a technical standpoint. Conservative tech-tards wrote it off as something that would never work, that it would never replace discs for media, etc. A few years later and it became an absolutely indispensable part of PC gaming.

Gabe is one of the few tech visionaries out there. He sees where the puck is going and he lays the groundwork years in advance to get to where its going.

Windows doesn't have an alternative for PC gaming. Not yet, but I think it will when Valve is through with their OS.

RE: competition = good
By Spuke on 12/4/2013 2:08:00 PM , Rating: 2
I think the reviewers are suffering from Avatar syndrome.
And I thought I was the only one that hated Avatar.

"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki