Print 36 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Dec 5 at 4:19 AM

By unifying its data across services and by offering no opt out, Google is breaking privacy laws in the EU

Google Inc. (GOOG) may be an outspoken critic of spying by the by U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), but these days it's in hot water over spying of its own.  Google was already shown to be circumventing privacy settings in Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) Internet Explorer and Apple, Inc.'s (AAPL) Safari in a purposeful attempt to disregard users' wishes in order to pump up profits.  Google also was found to be using its Street View cars in a worldwide snooping campaign on those who were naive enough to leave their network unencrypted.
Now Google is ruffling more feathers over its new unified data Terms of Use, which rolled out early last year.  Under its new terms Google and its affiliates -- which include the company's ad-network affiliates -- may put cookies on your computer to track your browsing history.  Further data on your usage of different Google services (e.g. YouTube, Gmail, etc.) is combined into a single profile that Google uses to target ads at you -- a use that Google doesn't explicitly asking your permission for.
The Netherlands has become the latest country to cry foul over this approach.  Dutch data protection director Jacob Kohnstamm says that Google's tactics are not only questionable -- they explicitly violate local privacy laws, "Google spins an invisible web of our personal data, without our consent. And that is forbidden by law."

Search on Google
Dutch regulators say Google's new terms of use violate the law by having no opt-out to monitoring.  [Image Source: Google Images/Unknown]

In The Netherlands, user internet activity is protected under the Dutch Data Protection Act [Wet Bescherming Persoonsgegevens], with the Dutch Data Protection Authority [College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens] (Dutch DPA) tasked with enforcement of the law.  In its press release the Dutch DPA writes:

Google does not adequately inform users about the combining of their personal data from all these different services. On top of that, Google does not offer users any (prior) options to consent to or reject the examined data processing activities. The consent, required by law, for the combining of personal data from different Google services cannot be obtained by accepting general (privacy) terms of service.

In, Europe Google has a more dominant search position than in the U.S.  In the EU, Google has held as much as 86 percent of the search market; currently it has around an 80 percent market share, according to Reuters.  This is much higher than in the U.S., where its market share is currently around 67 percent, according to market research firm Comscore.

Amsterdam, Netherlands
Amsterdam, Netherlands [Image Source: IASA Global]

While Google has tentatively settled an EU complaint accusing it of manipulating search engine results to boost its own services, it's still facing probes, investigations, and fines over the Street View and unified Terms of Service privacy issues.  These regions are looking to make sure that no one is monitoring users without permission -- whether its the U.S. government, or Europe's top search provider (Google).  Google is facing similar fines over the unified user data in France and is under investigation in Germany.  German regulators already fined Google a small sum (€145,000 -- roughly $196,000 USD) last year for the Street View offenses.

Source: Dutch DPA

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Easy Solution....for all you whiners
By GotThumbs on 12/2/2013 4:55:24 PM , Rating: 2
All Google needs to do is give every user an option:

If you wish to use our products/services for free, you understand we will use your information to support this "FREE" service to you, by using your activity to provide you with ads related to your interests, based on your actual activity. Your web activity and email content is ONLY used to provide meaningful ads to you and continues to support our daily operations and feed the families of our 46,000+ employees.

If you wish to opt out of the Free service supported by can still use our products/services for a nominal fee. You will be billed a daily use fee of $1.00-$5.00 depending on how many of our services/products you use. Please provide your CC'd info on the next page.

Thank you and have a great day...Google.

Simple solution eh?

Don't like the cost of a "FREE" you own. If/when you do.....You won't be giving it away for free for very long I'll bet. Employees, Hardware and electricity cost money in the real world.

~Best wishes keeping what you earn.

RE: Easy Solution....for all you whiners
By troysavary on 12/3/2013 12:09:11 AM , Rating: 2
We do have an option. Say FU to Google and abandon their services. More and more people are taking that route.

RE: Easy Solution....for all you whiners
By Reclaimer77 on 12/3/2013 12:23:22 AM , Rating: 2
LOL "FU Google!! I'll give my data to someone else for free! Muhahahaaa!!!"

RE: Easy Solution....for all you whiners
By rsmech on 12/3/2013 1:17:55 AM , Rating: 2
The others actually sell a product to make their money. Google sells you for profit. Google needs your information for profits more than the alternatives.

By Reclaimer77 on 12/3/2013 3:30:04 AM , Rating: 2
The others actually sell a product to make their money.

Except that business model cannot work for Google. They cannot charge money for web searches or email. Can you imagine them even trying? God no, it would be a disaster.

Google sells you for profit.

And I get absolutely nothing in return of course.

Oh wait...

I'm not being 'sold'. But you're being an idiot.

RE: Easy Solution....for all you whiners
By troysavary on 12/4/2013 11:19:59 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, I will. I'll give it to people I trust with it more. Why can't you understand that people no longer trust Google? Google's whole business model is based on mining your data. They have absolutely nothing else that makes profit for them. Nothing. They are just as bad as Facebook in that respect.
It isn't just data mining though that has them in hot water with regulators. It is purposely circumventing privacy measures users take. Or stealing WiFi data. Sure, you think that isn't stealing, but the courts disagree with you. Unfortunately for Google, fanboys don't make the laws.

By Reclaimer77 on 12/5/2013 4:19:54 AM , Rating: 2
Why can't you understand that people no longer trust Google?

That's hyperbole, sorry. All data suggests Google's services are as massively popular as they ever were. If people don't 'trust' Google, they have a funny way of showing it.

Google has the most popular and used mobile OS
Google has the most popular and used video hosting website
Google has the most popular and used Internet search
Google has the most popular and used webmail service

Notice a theme? You guys talking about hiding in shelters and going "Google free" are the wacko minority. Please don't speak for all of us.

Google's whole business model is based on mining your data.

The ENTIRE Internet now runs on that business model. Just more FUD on your part.

Ask yourself, when was the last time you actually directly paid for a web service, website access, or email? Why do you think all the things you can do online are free of charge?

It isn't just data mining though that has them in hot water with regulators.

The same regulators who took 10 years to allow mobile computing use on airplanes? The same regulators who gave us a patent system completely unable to function in the digital age? The same regulators who took 20 years to make net neutrality official?

Yeah place your faith in these people when it comes to technology issues! A bunch of old people who grew up on the AM radio in an age where the entire world fits in a pocket sized device, are making the rules for everyone.

Sure, you think that isn't stealing, but the courts disagree with you.

More hyperbole. No "court" of any significance has ever ruled Google's practices as being theft. Certainly no court has ever ruled on data mining as you're suggesting.

In fact the last time the Supreme Court made a ruling on data mining, the practice was upheld! Sorrell v. IMS Health, 10-779.

Are you going to bring more to this than impotent hate, lies, and exaggerations?

"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki