backtop


Print 97 comment(s) - last by rechiel7890.. on Dec 4 at 3:52 PM

Chromebooks currently have a small market share, but new models like the Acer C720P (touch edition) are hot items

Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) latest round of attacks on archrival Google Inc. (GOOG) is heating up.  After appearing to pull the plug on the "Scroogled" campaign -- the brainchild of a former campaign advisor to President William Jefferson "Bill" Clinton (D) -- Microsoft brought it back with a vengeance, unveiling a whole line of Google-mocking products ranging from mugs to shirts.

I. Microsoft Calls Chromebooks "Bricks"

Now Microsoft has come back with a new commercial featuring Gold & Silver Pawn Shop, the Las Vegas, Nevada pawn shop that gained a national following via the History Channel's reality TV series Pawn Stars.

Ricky Harrison -- the younger member of the pawn shop's three generation family who specialize in detecting "fake" products -- receives a call from a Microsoft employee who wants to know if a Google "Chromebook" might be "worth something".  Mr. Harrison laughs, responding, "[W]hen you're not connected, it's pretty much a brick."


Okay that's not quite accurate. Chrome OS uses the Chrome browser as the environment to run apps within, however, it does have offline builds of its core apps like Google Docs, and recently gave developers tools to make third-party apps offline accessible.  And while it leverages the cloud, that's not very different from Microsoft's own efforts, slowly phasing out the PC-side standalone Office suite for the cloud-enabled Office 365 app suite.

Chrome OS
Many Chrome OS apps now work just fine offline, contrary to Microsoft's claims.

At the root of Microsoft's argument is a simple assumption Microsoft firmly believes in -- if a laptop or desktop doesn't have Windows 8.1 and Office on it, it's pretty much useless. This is a sentiment echoed by hardcore Windows fans like Windows SuperSite blogger Paul Thurrott, who writes, "Google's Chromebook initiative is a laughable attempt to turn a web browser into an operating system that runs on mostly lackluster hardware."

II. Why Windows Supporters are Scared

Is Microsoft scared of the Chromebook, just trying to be funny, or some combination of both?

Compared to Apple Inc.'s (AAPL) Mac computer line, Chromebook sales appear less than impressive at present.  The Interactive Data Corp. (IDCreports that Chromebooks are only expected to move 3 million units this year, accounting for about 1 percent of the market.  But that figure only covers warehouse sales to brick-and-mortar establishments.  By contrast on some direct sellers like Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Chromebooks are outselling Windows 8.1 laptops.  Approximately 22 percent of school districts across the U.S. have adopted Chromebooks.

Chrome OS
[Image Source: ZDNet]

The NPD Group Inc. estimates that in H1 2013 Chromebooks captured 20-25 percent of the sub-$300 laptop market.  They estimate that 3 percent of laptops (all prices) bought in August-September back-to-school shopping season were Chrombooks.  And with new models out in time for the holidays, NPD Group VP of Industry Analysis Stephen Baker predicts Q4 2013 will be a watershed moment in Chrome OS's market adoption.  He comments:

[Chromebooks] are very well-positioned to expand that share over the holiday period The significant marketing and advertising support Google is providing its partners is likely to be a key a feature in helping continue to raise awareness of the product and show consumers that it is a reasonably priced alternative to a tablet.

With Windows 8/8.1 unpopularity riding at all time highs and with consumers opting to avoid high-end hardware in general, PC sales are seeing historic drops.  Microsoft appears less concerned about Apple -- whose sales have also been affected by the latter market trend.  After all Microsoft always prided itself as delivering quality at a budget price, as its past anti-Apple "I'm a PC" campaign illustrated.

In that regard Chromebooks represent perhaps a more serious long-term threat to Microsoft's bottom line.  Generally priced at $300 USD or lower, many of the models offer 7-9 hours of battery life, significantly better than the 4-7 hours that budget-to-mid-range Windows 8.1 laptops get.  Otherwise the hardware spec is somewhat low-end -- but then again so are the specs of budget Windows laptops.

Aside from targeting a market Microsoft took such pride in dominating, Chromebooks also are a headache for Microsoft as they're giving OEMs frustrated with Microsoft's role in poor PC sales an outlet.  One such OEM is Hewlett-Packard Comp. (HPQ).  Is the HP Chromebook 11 a brick?  

HP Chromebook 11
HP Chromebook 11 [Image Source: AnandTech]

Microsoft and Pawn Stars may say so, but AnandTech says otherwise, writing:

Under Google’s influence, HP has built a near perfect example of what an entry level PC should be. It boots fast (< 13 seconds even in dev mode), has a great display, comes with dual-band 2-stream 802.11n WiFi, has good sounding speakers, looks stylish, is light and feels well built. The keyboard is great and even the clickpad isn’t as bad as it is on far more expensive PCs.

You honestly get one of the best examples of a portable machine for $279, and that’s without even relying on the benefits of Chrome OS to help sell the bundle. Anyone looking for a glorified web browsing, email checking, internet terminal will be right at home with Chrome OS. Flash works and you obviously get what’s arguably the world’s best web browser. You don’t have to worry about updates, malware or viruses, all of that is taken care of for you. It’s the modern typewriter equivalent, a true entry level computer, and HP/Google have done an excellent job in bringing this to market.

ASUSTek Computer Inc. (TPE:2357) this quarter became the latest OEM to "cheat on" Microsoft with Chromebooks.  The message from OEMs to Microsoft seems clear -- "If we're not getting satisfaction in this marriage, we'll go out and find satisfaction elsewhere."

And "elsewhere" appears to the Chrome OS.

III. New Touch-Screen Acer Chromebook Wows 

In related news Acer Inc. (TPE:2353) strengthened its already best-selling Chromebook lineup this week with the addition of the C720P -- the touch-screen upgraded variant of the popular C720 which retails for $200 USD (2 GB) and $250 (4 GB), depending on your preference memory-wise.
Acer C720P

For $299 you get a thin (0.78-inch thick) and light (2.98 lb) laptop with:
  • 1377x768 11.6 inch screen with multitouch
  • Intel Corp. (INTC) dual-core 1.4 GHz Celeron 2955U (Haswell)
  • 7.5 hr. of battery life
  • 2 GB DRAM
  • 100 GB of Google Drive cloud storage (free for two years)
  • 12 Free GoGo Wireless in-flight passes
  • 32 GB SSD w/ 7 second boot
  • WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n
Acer C720P
Acer C720P
Acer C720P

By contrast about the best $300 USD will get you in terms of Windows touchscreen laptops is a Lenovo Group, Ltd. (HKG:0992IdeaPad S210 11.6-inch touchscreen laptop (and that's only when it's discounted 29 percent with a big sale).  

The Lenovo machine comes with slightly more memory (4 GB), but with a last-generation Ivy Bridge processor, the dual-core 1.9 GHz Intel Pentium 2127U ULV.  It's thicker (0.90 in.), weighs more (3.1 lb), has no SSD (instead it has a cheaper 500 GB, 5400 rpm HDD).  
 
Lenovo Ideapad S210
The Lenovo Ideapad S210 11.6-inch. (w/ Touchscreen, Windows 8.1) sells for $300 USD sale, but only gets about half the battery life of the Chromebook, has no SSD, and has a last-generation Intel processor.

And the kicker? The Windows competitor gets a claimed 4 hours of battery life -- about half what the Acer C720P Chromebook promises.  Well, you know what they say -- if you can't beat them make fun of them.

Windows 8.1 RTm
But Microsoft does offer one unique "benefit" -- Metro UI. [Image Source: CNET]

Feel free to share your thoughts on which budget laptop is "worthless" -- the thin, light, Chromebook with a fast SSD, latest-generation Intel processor, and 7.5 hours of battery life, or the Metro UI-packing Windows 8.1 laptop with more memory (4 GB), but a last generation processor, a slower HDD, a thick/heavier body, and only 4 hours of moderate-to-light use on a full charge. 

Sources: Microsoft on YouTube, Acer [C720P press release]



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: This article is full of bias
By Alexvrb on 11/28/2013 9:07:37 PM , Rating: 3
It's not just about what generation it is. The Windows laptop has a faster CPU - it's no contest. Competitively priced even with the Windows license, the Lenovo box has more RAM and a faster CPU, but worse battery life. So it's not an apples to apples comparison, but with that inept Celeron I'd have little use for the Chromebook. Now a faster Chromebook might be OK after a little ChrUbuntu or so forth.

Now for the big Presidential whopper: 2x or 3x more? You're on crack. :D A Chromebook is just like any other laptop. There's absolutely nothing magical about them and anyone that says otherwise is just as bad as an Apple zealot. If you take two identical laptops and one is a "Chromebook" and the other is a Windows device, you're looking at a relatively small difference in pricing due to the Windows license. Somewhere around $50 or so for big OEMs.


RE: This article is full of bias
By Motoman on 11/29/2013 11:48:22 AM , Rating: 3
I just picked up a quad-core 15.6" laptop with 4Gb of RAM and a 500Gb hard drive for $259. With Win8.1.

And no...it wasn't a Black Friday deal.

Frankly, there's always a reasonable Windows laptop available between $250 and $300.

There's really no way anyone could ever justify buying a Chromebook. Not unless they were somehow sold at like $100. That might be enough to justify the difference.

But there's not the slightest point in pretending that you're somehow getting a superior machine at that price point with a Chromebook vs. Windows. That's literally crazy talk.


RE: This article is full of bias
By ResStellarum on 11/29/13, Rating: 0
RE: This article is full of bias
By Motoman on 11/29/2013 6:27:16 PM , Rating: 2
I certainly hope you don't take yourself seriously.

quote:
A junk CPU, junk ram, and a slow and noisy storage device no doubt. Most laptops with those prices have old generation junk components.


http://www.microcenter.com/product/422619/Satellit...

$259 right now at Micro Center.
AMD A4-5000 quad-core
4GB DDR3-1333 RAM
500GB 5,400RPM Hard Drive
AMD Radeon HD 8330
DVD SuperMulti Drive
Memory Card Reader
10/100 Network
802.11b/g/n Wireless
Bluetooth 4.0
15.6" Widescreen TruBrite HD LED-backlit Display

Vs.

http://www.amazon.com/Acer-Chromebook-11-6-Inch-To...

Intel Celeron 2955U 1.4 GHz Processor (2 MB Cache)
2 GB DDR3 RAM
32 GB Solid-State Drive
11.6-Inch Touchscreen Display, Intel HD Graphics

So...where's the junk CPU and junk RAM? Oh, that's right - the $300 Chromebook. As for the "noisy storage" - first of all, it isn't. Secondly, you're an abject retard for even thinking "An SSD is not optional these days."

An SSD is the *least* important thing to the *VAST* majority of users. Ample storage space for pictures and music alone is infinitely more important...and that 32Gb SSD in the Chromebook will hardly hold anything. And who cares if the base Windows install takes 20Gb? That's f%cking irrelevant - especially when you're talking about having 480Gb of HD space left over.

I reiterate: there is *no* way to justify paying $300 for this craptastic Chromebook vs. someplace between $250 and $300 any day of the week for something like the Toshiba I linked. No. Way. In. Hell.

And if you think there is, you're wrong.


RE: This article is full of bias
By Reclaimer77 on 11/29/2013 9:51:31 PM , Rating: 1
Don't you think it's a little dishonest that you found the lowest price on the planet for that Toshiba, and it's walk in only? You can't even order it online for that price and have it shipped to you.

It's $359.99 on Amazon, as far as I'm concerned that is the price.

It also has ZERO user reviews on Amazon and ONE user review on Newegg. That alone makes me suspicious. If people aren't buying these damn things, why should I?

quote:
An SSD is the *least* important thing to the *VAST* majority of users.


Take the same exact system, but have an SSD on one and a HDD on the other. Do all the double blind tests you want, 100% of the users would tell you the one with the SSD was "faster".

Then come and tell me users don't care.


RE: This article is full of bias
By Alexvrb on 11/29/2013 10:35:49 PM , Rating: 2
Well that all depends. If you tell them that the only choices within their budget are a slow HDD, or a lightning fast SSD that doesn't have adequate storage for all their stuff... the choice isn't so obvious anymore. If you can afford a big enough SSD (at a higher price) or are willing to sacrifice other things (storage space, performance, both) then it's a lot simpler.

SSDs are better. Just like discrete graphics are better. Doesn't mean HDDs and integrated graphics don't have a home, especially way on the low end. I'd recommend a hybrid drive but they're a bit pricey, especially if you start looking at something like the Black2.

Unfortunetely most users don't want to deal (or don't know how to deal with) with two distinct storage pools/drives. A good SSD cache (mSATA etc) is often a good compromise, at least in mid-range laptops. Intel does have a pretty good caching option... I wish AMD would offer something like that without having to rely on third party caching software.


RE: This article is full of bias
By Motoman on 11/30/2013 12:55:31 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
If you tell them that the only choices within their budget are a slow HDD, or a lightning fast SSD that doesn't have adequate storage for all their stuff... the choice isn't so obvious anymore. If you can afford a big enough SSD (at a higher price) or are willing to sacrifice other things (storage space, performance, both) then it's a lot simpler.


It's really sad that some people can't get this.

Is an SSD "better" than a HDD? Sure. Would most people prefer to have SSD performance over HDD performance? Sure.

...but in the case above, try telling the user they can either have a ridiculously tiny 32Gb SSD or a 500Gb HDD for the same price. If you've got someone who's financially limited to the sub-$300 laptop market, there's not really a choice to be made there...you'd be an abject retard if you went with only 32Gb of storage space.

And if you can afford to buy a large SSD, then you're not in the market for a $300 laptop, now are you?


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki