backtop


Print 15 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Dec 20 at 8:58 PM

In the text area, a familiar punctuation mark is taking on a new meaning

The digital age of instant communication has dramatically affected the English language by changing its grammar, spelling, and vocabulary.  Then again the English language has survived and thrived due in part to its shameless flexibility, which historically led it to liberally borrow from other language and accept unusual new creative linguistic constructs.

The New Republic is a news site that focuses primarily on espousing neoliberal political views, but it also offers a bit of interesting technology coverage at times.  Story editor Ben Crair has actually offered up a rather interesting piece on how the period has become a long desired piece of punctuation -- the "irony mark".

A 2007 study by The American University found that at the time students add sentence ending punctuation (i.e. '!', '?', and '.') 39 percent of the time in texts and 45 percent of the time in online chats.  The punctuation at the end of the last sentence of the text -- the so-called "transmission-ending punctuation" occurred especially infrequently.  It was found in only 29 percent for texts and 35 percent for IMs.
The angry period

Part of English language speakers' trend of shortening words -- noted by other peer-reviewed research -- and dropping punctuation in the digital age is out of necessity.  Twitter posts are limited to 140 characters, traditional SMS was limited to 160 characters.

But it is still somewhat odd to observe how in an age where punctuation is being mothballed by so many, that digital denizens are increasing the period ('.') to express sarcasm, frustration, and/or anger.

Mark Liberman, a professor of linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania, tells Mr. Blair:

Not long ago, my 17-year-old son noted that many of my texts to him seemed excessively assertive or even harsh, because I routinely used a period at the end.

In the world of texting and IMing … the default is to end just by stopping, with no punctuation mark at all.  In that situation, choosing to add a period also adds meaning because the reader(s) need to figure out why you did it. And what they infer, plausibly enough, is something like ‘This is final, this is the end of the discussion or at least the end of what I have to contribute to it.’

But lest the humble dot feel demeaned, it still has many friendlier usages, such as it symbolic use in internet domain names and "..." which strangely has the reverse affect as a single '.' when ending the sentence -- inviting the conversation to continue.

Sources: The New Republic, The American Univ. [pdf; study]



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Truth.
By Schrag4 on 12/9/2013 12:46:21 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
People who are so high and mighty to believe that a mistake could not be accidental, but a sign of the user's stupidity, and a chance to prove their superiority? (Hint to grammar Nazis, this is why people typically hate you)


I'm an introverted grammar Nazi. I really hate seeing improper use of lose/loose, its/it's, their/there/they're, and others but I almost always keep it to myself. By the way, if you're ever subjected to a grammar correction, you really shouldn't get offended. Either you made an honest mistake, or you're being given a free lesson on how to get people to respect your written opinion. I agree that nobody is perfect, and I make spelling and grammatical errors too, but if your writing is littered with errors that are obviously not typos (because you repeat them over and over) then others are going to tune you out.

Back to the subject at hand: IMO, texts and IMs are meant to be rather short, as in one sentence. I'll admit that I typically don't include a period unless I'm separating 2 or more sentences in a single sent message. If I'm breaking a single sentence into 2 sent message then I try to always end the first sent message with "..."

I'm sure a real grammar Nazi will come along tear this post a new one. That's OK, though, because I'm open to constructive criticism :-)


RE: Truth.
By tng on 12/18/2013 10:29:40 AM , Rating: 2
I am not a Grammar Nazi, but I do get somewhat annoyed by some of the comments I see on this and other sites. I see allot of comments that look like they are written by a 13 year old girl who is just leaning English. Who knows, maybe they are written by a 13 year old girl who is just leaning English.


"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook

Related Articles
















botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki